Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
Tue May 21, 2019, 05:26 AM May 2019

judge in Trump's tax appeal. Wait for it

If this is a dupe, I apologize. Plus I'm not sure if I know how to properly post a tweet.


https://mobile.twitter.com/NYinLA2121/status/1130648677456809984

YS
@NYinLA2121
Guess the judge who will hear Trump’s appeal on his taxes vs. The House?

Wait for it.

Wait for it.

Wait for it.

Wait for it.

Wait for it.

Wait for it.

Wait for it.

Wait for it.

Wait for it.

Wait for it.

Wait for it.

Wait for it.

Wait for it.

Merrick Fucking Garland
8:37 PM · May 20, 2019 · Twitter for iPhone
8.9K
Retweets
34.3K
Likes

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
judge in Trump's tax appeal. Wait for it (Original Post) quickesst May 2019 OP
No, you're not wrong ... LenaBaby61 May 2019 #1
I know you're probably right.... quickesst May 2019 #4
He's Chief Justice, but it will be a three-judge panel and he may or may not end up among them hlthe2b May 2019 #2
Not necessarily. onenote May 2019 #3
Well, looks like my zeal quickesst May 2019 #5
He'd probably recuse himself, if he were named to the panel. nt Honeycombe8 May 2019 #12
THIS probably 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 LenaBaby61 May 2019 #17
They will demand he recuse himself. Takket May 2019 #6
I broke a cardinal rule quickesst May 2019 #7
tRump will never die. Scarsdale May 2019 #8
Would the appeal be filed by Fat Donny or by the accounting firm, or both? 3Hotdogs May 2019 #9
Thanks for posting this. kag May 2019 #10
If he's assigned he won't recuse himself onenote May 2019 #14
Let's hope Karma is a r eal b*tch in this case! pdsimdars May 2019 #11
Revenge is a Dish Best Served Cold Roy Rolling May 2019 #13
Thanks everybody.... quickesst May 2019 #15
As other have said, that's not a definite StarfishSaver May 2019 #16

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
1. No, you're not wrong ...
Tue May 21, 2019, 05:48 AM
May 2019

However, I hope that Garland doesn't bend over backwards to show how fair he IS with a ruling that is favorable to treasonous, racist, sexist, imbecilic FATSO.

Sorry to be a wet blanket, but nothing I've seen in politics the last decade surprises me any longer, especially this tRumputin, rigged-in presidency or the way treasonous thuglican Senators are caping for their hog-in-chief.

hlthe2b

(102,200 posts)
2. He's Chief Justice, but it will be a three-judge panel and he may or may not end up among them
Tue May 21, 2019, 06:12 AM
May 2019

Cases are heard by panels of three judges randomly assigned to the case so Garland is not necessarily going to hear the appeal (unless the decision is reviewed by the full court).

onenote

(42,684 posts)
3. Not necessarily.
Tue May 21, 2019, 06:15 AM
May 2019

The appeal, which hasn’t been filed yet, will be heard by a three judge panel of the DC circuit. There are 11 active judges on the court - 4 Obama appointees, two Trump appointees, 3 Clinton. One G W Bush and one GHW Bush. Plus there are 7senior status judges who sometimes serve on appellate panels — 5 are Reagan appointees, one a GHW Bush and one a Carter appointee.

Garland is Chief Judge but that doesn’t mean he’ll be on the panel that hears the appeal and even if he is there will be two other judges on that panel.

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
5. Well, looks like my zeal
Tue May 21, 2019, 06:21 AM
May 2019

.... and not doing proper research has come back to bite me in the rear. maybe I should just delete before everybody else wakes up points out my shortcoming. I guess I can take some comfort knowing that I have a lot of company in the twitterverse.

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
17. THIS probably 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Tue May 21, 2019, 06:34 PM
May 2019

thuglicans will 99% of the time NOT recuse themselves when they should. Meanwhile, Dems recuse themselves from taking part in a judicial case where there may be a conflict of interest.

Takket

(21,552 posts)
6. They will demand he recuse himself.
Tue May 21, 2019, 06:25 AM
May 2019

Last edited Tue May 21, 2019, 08:13 AM - Edit history (1)

Then when they eventually lose they will REAPPEAL on the grounds Garland should have recused and we will start the clock all over again. This is all they have left. ENDLESS appeals until drumpf dies.

Scarsdale

(9,426 posts)
8. tRump will never die.
Tue May 21, 2019, 06:51 AM
May 2019

Garbage lingers until it rots. Sometimes it takes years and years. He wants to be KING forever. Anyone else with a diet such as his has many health problems. tRump just gets fatter. His neck has disappeared into his chest, he has to rotate his entire upper body to turn his head. He lumbers onto the stage like an arthritic senior citizen, applauding himself with each step. Vile excuse for a human being. I guess the "Be Best" campaign of his "vife" has no affect on him. As usual, he thinks the fault lies with EVERYONE but him.

kag

(4,079 posts)
10. Thanks for posting this.
Tue May 21, 2019, 07:29 AM
May 2019

Even with all of the "corrections" people have responded with, it's interesting news. Just the fact that Garland is the Chief on this panel is some sweet karma.

Also, I'm not so sure he will have to recuse. After all, Dump never did anything to him. Now, if it were Cocaine Turtle's tax returns...

onenote

(42,684 posts)
14. If he's assigned he won't recuse himself
Tue May 21, 2019, 08:48 AM
May 2019

The chief judge doesn’t sit on every three judge panel. Assignments are largely random. If Garland ends up being assigned to the appeal there is no way he recused himself since there is no reason for him to do so

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
15. Thanks everybody....
Tue May 21, 2019, 08:49 AM
May 2019

.... For not dumping on me when I thought this might be a bigger deal than it is. I will try to be more diligent in the future.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»judge in Trump's tax appe...