Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MSNBC reporting that the Dept of Justice and the Intelligence Committee have a deal (Original Post) Baitball Blogger May 2019 OP
To whom? tavernier May 2019 #1
To Congress...the people's branch of government pecosbob May 2019 #2
It will go to Congress, but I thought I heard the word "Intelligence" Baitball Blogger May 2019 #5
Yeah, something fuzzy about that. tavernier May 2019 #8
The Intelligence Committee StarfishSaver May 2019 #12
Adam Schiff has a higher clearance than most. He is the chair. gldstwmn May 2019 #38
What does "unredacted version" mean? Nevilledog May 2019 #3
I don't understand why MSNBC hasn't turned away from this panel discussion Baitball Blogger May 2019 #9
Too much shit hitting the fan at the same time perhaps. Nevilledog May 2019 #11
Someone once said that things will go quickly, when it begins to fall apart. Baitball Blogger May 2019 #13
I believe this to be true. Nevilledog May 2019 #16
sort of a tautology, tho, i think. mopinko May 2019 #21
When the dam finally broke during Watergate, murielm99 May 2019 #44
interesting poll this morning, tho. mopinko May 2019 #62
Sounds and feels right. elleng May 2019 #53
"An unredacted version" CentralMass May 2019 #27
As opposed to... skypilot May 2019 #34
It implies that it might not be the raw report. CentralMass May 2019 #48
To me it means everything, including the grand jury testimony. gldstwmn May 2019 #39
Senate or House Intel? Dennis Donovan May 2019 #4
House Intel pecosbob May 2019 #7
Thank you! Baitball Blogger May 2019 #10
If he thinks he's having a bad day lillypaddle May 2019 #32
Excellent point. Rhiannon12866 May 2019 #65
Hope that's correct. Chin music May 2019 #6
Next week StarfishSaver May 2019 #14
This is one of three things DFW May 2019 #15
Tillerson may have been a tipping point. Baitball Blogger May 2019 #17
As with Nixon DFW May 2019 #18
Right there. Chin music May 2019 #19
Spot On! (n/t) corbettkroehler May 2019 #28
Yeah, Tillerson not fooled May 2019 #30
I'm wondering if he asked Tillerson to push some business deal for him? Baitball Blogger May 2019 #31
Oooohhhh not fooled May 2019 #33
He was head of Exxon...of course his agenda was exactly the same as Cheney pecosbob May 2019 #35
Maybe he's being proactive, trying to provide a cushion of immunity or at least, Baitball Blogger May 2019 #37
I think they wanted to grill him pecosbob May 2019 #42
russian pipelines through Ukraine and elsewhere? Chin music May 2019 #58
Tillerson witnessed the incident with the interpreter in Hamburg. gldstwmn May 2019 #46
is this the "give me your notes" incident? maxsolomon May 2019 #55
That's the one. I think that could turn out to be one sticky wicket. gldstwmn May 2019 #56
I think #1 would too easily backfire. Too many know the whole report. defacto7 May 2019 #22
Tillerson is key I think. gldstwmn May 2019 #40
Plus, he volunteered! Scarsdale May 2019 #43
Yup. I'm beginning to wonder if Kushner might gldstwmn May 2019 #47
I'm sure he has the potential to be a fly in the Trump-Barr-McConnell ointment DFW May 2019 #51
HI, DFW. YES for #3! elleng May 2019 #54
May the Great Spirit grant our wish! n/t DFW May 2019 #57
Why not 3? I say assume the best. triron May 2019 #61
aren't there things they can't release? stopdiggin May 2019 #20
The intel commitee already has the right to see the unredacted version. defacto7 May 2019 #23
Thanks stopdiggin May 2019 #24
Exactly. Schiff is one of I think 6 Dems gldstwmn May 2019 #41
They basically threw a tantrum in the Rose Garden this morning pecosbob May 2019 #25
It's in full swing. Go look at his feed. gldstwmn May 2019 #49
They are turning over documents related to the COUNTERINTELLIGENCE investigation stopbush May 2019 #26
No one has seen that with the exception of the FBI. gldstwmn May 2019 #50
compromise, not the whole deal stopdiggin May 2019 #29
He is a having a rough day. His Twitter feed is all about this. gldstwmn May 2019 #36
Barr Doesn't Want To Go To Jail After All DallasNE May 2019 #45
He had to have known it was going to go that way though. gldstwmn May 2019 #52
Might be... LudwigPastorius May 2019 #59
Collusion Is Not A Crime DallasNE May 2019 #60
That is NOT what Mueller said in the report. former9thward May 2019 #63
Spliting Hairs Here DallasNE May 2019 #66
I am not splitting hairs. former9thward May 2019 #67
Let Mueller Testify DallasNE May 2019 #68
Nice Hekate May 2019 #64

Nevilledog

(50,952 posts)
3. What does "unredacted version" mean?
Wed May 22, 2019, 01:15 PM
May 2019

It's gotta be the full report, without any redactions, or it's just another redacted report.

Baitball Blogger

(46,658 posts)
9. I don't understand why MSNBC hasn't turned away from this panel discussion
Wed May 22, 2019, 01:18 PM
May 2019

to provide more details. They seem to be talking about Trump's blow-up with the Public Infra-structure meeting, and of course Pelosi's cover-up comment.

mopinko

(69,965 posts)
21. sort of a tautology, tho, i think.
Wed May 22, 2019, 01:49 PM
May 2019

it may be that when things go quickly, it all begins to fall apart.
i think it is the deluge of journalism that is happening now.

murielm99

(30,712 posts)
44. When the dam finally broke during Watergate,
Wed May 22, 2019, 03:29 PM
May 2019

I needed a scorecard, but did not have one. I felt like sitting on the floor in the living room with my head in my hands. And I had been faithful in keeping up! Imagine the people who had not paid attention.

I am worried about the people now who are not paying attention. We did not have Faux News during Watergate.

mopinko

(69,965 posts)
62. interesting poll this morning, tho.
Wed May 22, 2019, 06:48 PM
May 2019

fox news poll found 81% of people highly or extremely interested in 2020. compares to 82% oct '16.

and if we're lucky, we get a 2fer, and faux comes out looking like the paid propaganda outlet that it is.

lillypaddle

(9,580 posts)
32. If he thinks he's having a bad day
Wed May 22, 2019, 03:07 PM
May 2019

he should reflect on how bad it would be if he were in a cage in Texas in the heat of May.

Chin music

(23,002 posts)
6. Hope that's correct.
Wed May 22, 2019, 01:17 PM
May 2019

And I also hope there's not a date certain for it...in like Sept. Bc that's been the pattern to cool everyone out everyday. Say "relief is coming"..today, with the proviso,..'but you have to wait. And wait. And wait.' Until possibly, it's too late, we(they), confuse you, or find some lawyer that will make that promise in MAY, unacceptable to them in Sept. but, it got them to Sept. on and on.
And on.

DFW

(54,256 posts)
15. This is one of three things
Wed May 22, 2019, 01:23 PM
May 2019

Scenario 1.) DOJ is going to turn over a doctored version and hope no one who saw the original gets to let the cat out of the bag.

Scenario 2.) Trump and his private legal staff have been (or will be) clued in as how to deal with any and all uncomfortable passages.

Scenario 3.) Barr is throwing in the towel (may or may not include resigning soon--he must have heard where Tillerson was yesterday), and is leaving the moron to twist in the wind.


My guess is somewhere between scenarios one and two, but wouldn't #3 be nice to contemplate?

Baitball Blogger

(46,658 posts)
17. Tillerson may have been a tipping point.
Wed May 22, 2019, 01:28 PM
May 2019

But, if that new Mueller report comes out next week, I don't think Trump's private legal staff will be able to keep up with all the information that is being revealed every day. And sometimes, several things in the same day! We just need to keep notice of all that we're learning by the hour, because you know that the powers that will take Trump down, will be two steps ahead of us.

DFW

(54,256 posts)
18. As with Nixon
Wed May 22, 2019, 01:36 PM
May 2019

If it comes to that, the powers that will bring Trump down will have an R after their titles (and before their states).

As I have always thought--the tipping point to make his right wing support in Congress evaporate is when they see polls so negatively stacked against them that even with voter suppression and vote counting fraud, they STILL lose the Senate and lose bigger in the House than they did last time. Self-preservation is a far more powerful motivator than loyalty among congressional Republicans. After all, plenty of them were counting on lucrative lobbying jobs after their terms in office. No repeat term in office, no lucrative lobbying job. That is enough to make ANY Republican Congressperson say, "Donald who?"

not fooled

(5,799 posts)
30. Yeah, Tillerson
Wed May 22, 2019, 03:02 PM
May 2019

going in for questioning was a BFD--after all, he saw red don up close and personal, after which he called the moron a moron and got fired as a result. And, even though he is an oil soaked plutocrat, he probably doesn't want the country to go down in flames because of the moron. So, he likely didn't pull any punches and spilled the beans on the rampant criminality.

not fooled

(5,799 posts)
33. Oooohhhh
Wed May 22, 2019, 03:10 PM
May 2019

that's a good point. Much more likely he did than didn't.

And red don no longer really has any hold on Tillerson, unlike many others, so Rex could do the right thing without fear of repercussions (other than perhaps some dirty looks at the country club).




pecosbob

(7,532 posts)
35. He was head of Exxon...of course his agenda was exactly the same as Cheney
Wed May 22, 2019, 03:17 PM
May 2019

and every other neo-con oil CEO that oozes into a cabinet post everytime the Rs are in charge.

pecosbob

(7,532 posts)
42. I think they wanted to grill him
Wed May 22, 2019, 03:28 PM
May 2019

on why the State Department has not yet spent any of the $120 million it has been allocated to combat foreign efforts to meddle in U.S. elections. And Tillerson basically blamed it on Trump.

gldstwmn

(4,575 posts)
46. Tillerson witnessed the incident with the interpreter in Hamburg.
Wed May 22, 2019, 03:31 PM
May 2019

He was there. He knows what they talked about. He sacrificed a $180 million retirement package to come work for this administration only to be undermined by Kushner and f'ed over by Trump. This might be key to the outcome of this whole thing.

gldstwmn

(4,575 posts)
47. Yup. I'm beginning to wonder if Kushner might
Wed May 22, 2019, 03:33 PM
May 2019

wind up being one of the sacrificial lambs. It won't matter though because if they get Kushner then I'm pretty sure they've got Trump.

DFW

(54,256 posts)
51. I'm sure he has the potential to be a fly in the Trump-Barr-McConnell ointment
Wed May 22, 2019, 03:38 PM
May 2019

Tillerson knows plenty about Russian connections. The big question I see is whether or not Tillerson CAN be offered enough to spill all the beans he is holding. He certainly has more money than he knows what to do with, and I don't think he has any felony indictments hanging over his head. So revenge for humiliation seems to be the only motive he could possibly have for cooperating with Congress.

That having been said, revenge for humiliation, as we know only too well after two and a half years of Trump, can be as motivating as money, provided the person in question already has plenty of it (and Tillerson does).

stopdiggin

(11,232 posts)
20. aren't there things they can't release?
Wed May 22, 2019, 01:48 PM
May 2019

I thought there were actual legal impediments to releasing some of the report? (Grand jury stuff + ?) Has this changed? Would it (could it) be released to Intelligence under some sort of gag order? Coming from the DOJ, something doesn't sound exactly right here.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
23. The intel commitee already has the right to see the unredacted version.
Wed May 22, 2019, 02:05 PM
May 2019

It's only the DOJ that denies it.

gldstwmn

(4,575 posts)
41. Exactly. Schiff is one of I think 6 Dems
Wed May 22, 2019, 03:26 PM
May 2019

Who has had a high enough security clearance all along to read the unredacted report. Barr had to have known this would happen eventually though. I wonder if he sees that Donnie's sales job of no collusion no obstruction has been a failure to the public or if they have another dirty trick up their sleeve? Either way, I don't think they saw Tillerson coming. That one hurt.
Trump's behavior in the non meeting this morning also seems desperate.

pecosbob

(7,532 posts)
25. They basically threw a tantrum in the Rose Garden this morning
Wed May 22, 2019, 02:12 PM
May 2019

Judge Mehta's ruling on Mazar says 'get that sh*t outta my house', Justice backpedals and agrees to release the unredacted report to House Intel, and search warrants for Michael Cohen's phone show over 1000 contacts with principal Russians post election day.

I predict a Tweet Typhoon.

stopbush

(24,388 posts)
26. They are turning over documents related to the COUNTERINTELLIGENCE investigation
Wed May 22, 2019, 02:17 PM
May 2019

that was conducted concerning the Russians and the tRump campaign. This was not covered in the Mueller report, per se. Reportedly it will include evidence that was not included in the Mueller Report’s piles of evidence.

gldstwmn

(4,575 posts)
50. No one has seen that with the exception of the FBI.
Wed May 22, 2019, 03:36 PM
May 2019

We don;t know what the hell is in that thing. But if Orange's behavior today is any indication...

stopdiggin

(11,232 posts)
29. compromise, not the whole deal
Wed May 22, 2019, 02:42 PM
May 2019

NYTimes reporting makes this sound like a compromise deal. Not the whole unredacted report.

NYTimes --
"Mr. Schiff’s subpoena is broad, encompassing Robert S. Mueller III’s full report, its underlying evidence and the intelligence-related materials his investigation produced. But in an effort to find an initial compromise, Mr. Schiff said he would accept documents in 12 narrower categories, though he has not specified publicly what they are."

"The Intelligence Committee appears to be getting material that was not subject to the privilege claim. As one of two congressional bodies charged with overseeing American intelligence agencies, it has strong legal claims on such counterintelligence and intelligence information, and in this case, the Democrats requesting the material had the support of Republicans on the committee.

It is unclear if the department will reconsider Mr. Trump’s privilege claim going forward. Democrats plan to challenge it in court."

gldstwmn

(4,575 posts)
36. He is a having a rough day. His Twitter feed is all about this.
Wed May 22, 2019, 03:18 PM
May 2019

He even made a little sign for his podium that said "No Collusion."

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
45. Barr Doesn't Want To Go To Jail After All
Wed May 22, 2019, 03:30 PM
May 2019

The writing was on the wall following the Judge's other ruling that basically said the Administrations argument lacked merit and allowed the stay to expire at the end of this week.

gldstwmn

(4,575 posts)
52. He had to have known it was going to go that way though.
Wed May 22, 2019, 03:39 PM
May 2019

I still haven;t figured out Barr's angle in all of this.

LudwigPastorius

(9,085 posts)
59. Might be...
Wed May 22, 2019, 04:11 PM
May 2019

the kind of deal that just allows the heads of the Intelligence Committee to view it, but not copy it for dissemination.

I believe that was something the crooks at Justice were proposing earlier.

They don't want it out because they'll lose control of their "no collusion, no obstruction" spin.

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
60. Collusion Is Not A Crime
Wed May 22, 2019, 05:14 PM
May 2019

Conspiracy is a crime. Mueller said he could not charge conspiracy because that requires proving intent. That was the case because people would not talk because of the obstruction in the form of pardons to hand out like candy. I came away with the feeling that those close to the President were not indicted at this time because the result would be a pardon. Wait until Trump is out of office and then charge them, taking away the promise of a pardon. That might also loosen up some lips.

former9thward

(31,913 posts)
63. That is NOT what Mueller said in the report.
Wed May 22, 2019, 07:46 PM
May 2019

He did not say he could not charge conspiracy because people "did not talk". The report is online for anyone to read.

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
66. Spliting Hairs Here
Thu May 23, 2019, 05:10 PM
May 2019

The analysis I was paraphrasing did not say "did not talk". It said "would not cooperate". BFD

former9thward

(31,913 posts)
67. I am not splitting hairs.
Thu May 23, 2019, 06:49 PM
May 2019

Who did not cooperate? Where in the Mueller report does he complain about non-cooperation affecting the collusion/conspiracy section?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MSNBC reporting that the ...