Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

DetlefK

(16,423 posts) Thu May 23, 2019, 09:53 AM May 2019

Have you noticed? Trump accidently destroyed a republican talking-point.

"Oh those Democrats! So busy with their investigations that they have no time to legislate!"

And here is Trump saying that he refuses to legislate because of the investigation.

Meanwhile more than a dozen major House bills and committee bills are held in limbo in the Senate because McConnell refuses to schedule votes for them.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Have you noticed? Trump accidently destroyed a republican talking-point. (Original Post) DetlefK May 2019 OP

I'm trying to think of a phrase to describe McConnell....... Firestorm49 May 2019 #1

Oh that darn "I" word! imanamerican63 May 2019 #2

That's all well and good but nykym May 2019 #3

Firestorm49

(4,032 posts)

1. I'm trying to think of a phrase to describe McConnell.......

Reply to DetlefK (Original post)

Thu May 23, 2019, 10:28 AM

May 2019

but in our language to date, there is none vile enough to describe this poor excuse of a “leader.”

imanamerican63

(13,785 posts)

2. Oh that darn "I" word!

Reply to DetlefK (Original post)

Thu May 23, 2019, 10:31 AM

May 2019

Not "investigation" or "impeachment"!

The othe "I" word "IDIOT"!

nykym

(3,063 posts)

3. That's all well and good but

Reply to DetlefK (Original post)

Thu May 23, 2019, 12:40 PM

May 2019

The House Dems really need someone to be touting all these bills passed on a daily basis and point out the fact that they are stalled in the Senate.
It's all about messaging and we are not doing a good job.

Reply to this discussion