General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaggie Haberman is at the top of "trending" on Twitter, over that Hope Hicks NYT piece.
Eventually, she will learn what works and what doesn't...maybe.
Maggie Haberman
Trending with: #HopeHicks
hlthe2b
(114,685 posts)for most of us, so I doubt I'm alone in not having any idea what you are talking about...
Thanks~!
Mister Ed
(6,991 posts)Some us of this morning don't know what's written in "that Hope Hicks piece". Could the OP please perhaps offer a little one-sentience summary?
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Thank you.
Miles Archer
(24,332 posts)1). Use of what critics of the piece are calling the "glamour shot" photo used in the article, and
2). Speculation over whether she will defy the subpoena.
I'm not going to regurgitate all of the nuances over the "controversy" surrounding the article...those have been the two main objections. Sort of "will she, won't she" gossip rag patter versus "the esteemed award-winning journalism of the NYT."
And since I'm bound by the four paragraph rule, these are the first four paragraphs.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/23/us/politics/hope-hicks-subpoena.html
By Maggie Haberman
May 23, 2019
One of the best-known but least visible former members of President Trumps White House staff is facing an existential question: whether to comply with a congressional subpoena in the coming weeks.
The aide, the former communications director Hope Hicks, who left the White House with an enduring mystique that inspired countless news media profiles, is now a private citizen living in California. One of the presidents original campaign aides, she went on to become one of his closest advisers while managing to maintain a personal relationship with him, his daughter Ivanka and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner.
But she has not completely left her time in the White House behind: She appears on more than two dozen pages in the report by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, mostly in the second volume, which deals with allegations of obstruction of justice against Mr. Trump.
Like few others in the White House, Ms. Hicks was witness to some of the presidents angriest moments and most pointed directives about the investigations into the Trump campaign and its contacts with Russians in 2016. Her dilemma now is how to respond to House Democrats, who have grown frustrated and increasingly aggressive in the face of a sweeping decision by the Trump administration, and the Trump Organization, to oppose such subpoenas.
hlthe2b
(114,685 posts)empedocles
(15,751 posts)Empty Wheel's Marcy. [A great 'close reader']
Would be interesting to know how NYT's editors handle that.
rusty fender
(3,428 posts)Habermans characterization of Hicks choice to comply with the subpoena as existential. Pretty funny stuff
nolabear
(43,850 posts)UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)PLENTY of times slam rump or whomever. Lack of objectivity is REAL THING EVERYWHERE.
This thread is LADEN with it.
Boomerproud
(9,363 posts)One of tRumps chief apologists masquerading as a serious journalist.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.