Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
18 replies, 3299 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (53)
ReplyReply to this post
18 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tweet of the Day (Original Post)
RandySF
May 2019
OP
But in reality, it's clearly not mandatory for people in this administration
DavidDvorkin
May 2019
#8
Hope might not be deepest thinker ever to have been on staff at the White House
struggle4progress
May 2019
#9
Answer: Fk YES she should comply with the subpoena! WTH have we become to even ask such a ?
OMGWTF
May 2019
#16
But don't you know trump and his cronies don't have to follow the laws/rules.
iluvtennis
May 2019
#17
qazplm135
(7,447 posts)1. it's also about as existential
as an Alanis Morrisette song is ironic.
Bob Loblaw
(1,900 posts)4. Isn't it moronic?
nt
malaise
(268,949 posts)2. Get thee to the greatest page
Too many passes are being given to these enablers
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)3. I wouldn't give Hope any verified airtime.
snark, double entendre
BigmanPigman
(51,584 posts)5. Have some respect, she is deciding which shoes will match her handcuffs.
malaise
(268,949 posts)7. DUzy
DavidDvorkin
(19,473 posts)8. But in reality, it's clearly not mandatory for people in this administration
So Hicks can ignore it, too.
Beartracks
(12,809 posts)14. Well, it *is* mandatory. But until there are consequences...
=======
DavidDvorkin
(19,473 posts)18. Right
It's mandatory, but it might as well not be.
struggle4progress
(118,280 posts)9. Hope might not be deepest thinker ever to have been on staff at the White House
Funtatlaguy
(10,870 posts)10. Oh, Donny, I won't swat your hand away like your wife does.
Lady Freedom Returns
(14,120 posts)11. They need to start locking up these people.
If it was John Q Citizen, they would be. No more special treatment.
spanone
(135,827 posts)12. K&R...
Beartracks
(12,809 posts)13. Right. You're not being ASKED to appear; you're being SUMMONED. n/t
Skittles
(153,150 posts)15. love the Glamour Shot photo for criminal activiy
OMGWTF
(3,951 posts)16. Answer: Fk YES she should comply with the subpoena! WTH have we become to even ask such a ?
iluvtennis
(19,850 posts)17. But don't you know trump and his cronies don't have to follow the laws/rules.