Tue May 28, 2019, 03:42 PM
aikoaiko (31,285 posts)
ATL Journal Constitution: Broad Georgia ethics probe targets Abrams -- and her backersdamn it. https://www.ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/broad-georgia-ethics-probe-targets-abrams-and-her-backers/NBT2JDLOZqDgUq1vTz4xOO/?utm_source=newspaper&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=8416631&ecmp=newspaper_email&
The head of Georgia’s ethics commission has filed a spate of subpoenas targeting groups led by Stacey Abrams and the chairwoman of the state Democratic Party, prompting criticism that he’s trying to exact political revenge against Republican Gov. Brian Kemp’s political opponents. The subpoenas obtained by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution were filed on April 26 by new ethics chief David Emadi and seek extensive financial, bank and payroll records from the Abrams’ campaign, which raised roughly $30 million in last year’s race against Kemp. The ethics office also wants all correspondence between the Abrams campaign and a constellation of left-leaning groups that registered and mobilized voters, many with a focus on energizing minorities. They include the voting rights group Abrams helped launch and a nonprofit co-founded by state Sen. Nikema Williams, the new leader of the state Democratic Party. In the documents, Emadi reveals that investigators intend to present evidence that the Abrams campaign accepted donations from four of the groups that exceeded maximum contribution limits for a statewide campaign.
|
10 replies, 1498 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
aikoaiko | May 2019 | OP |
CurtEastPoint | May 2019 | #1 | |
elleng | May 2019 | #2 | |
uponit7771 | May 2019 | #3 | |
Hoyt | May 2019 | #7 | |
uponit7771 | May 2019 | #10 | |
Ilsa | May 2019 | #4 | |
RANDYWILDMAN | May 2019 | #5 | |
rurallib | May 2019 | #6 | |
gratuitous | May 2019 | #8 | |
Kurt V. | May 2019 | #9 |
Response to aikoaiko (Original post)
Tue May 28, 2019, 03:45 PM
CurtEastPoint (13,511 posts)
1. Your boy won. Fuck you. Get over it. Right? But his emails? Fuck you GOP.
Response to aikoaiko (Original post)
Tue May 28, 2019, 03:46 PM
elleng (104,606 posts)
2. Of COURSE, that's how they PLAY, HARDBALL, ALWAYS.
I suspect Stacey Abrams expected this.
|
Response to aikoaiko (Original post)
Tue May 28, 2019, 03:47 PM
uponit7771 (74,572 posts)
3. Kemp excluded 13,000 voters & won by 14000 and wants to open an ethics investigation on Abrams??!
LOCK HIM UP!!
|
Response to uponit7771 (Reply #3)
Tue May 28, 2019, 03:58 PM
Hoyt (47,834 posts)
7. KKKemp actually won by roughly 55,000 votes. Still more work to do in Georgia until the rubes
die off.
|
Response to Hoyt (Reply #7)
Tue May 28, 2019, 04:42 PM
uponit7771 (74,572 posts)
10. Got it, I'm thinking of the Run Off vote not the end count. It would've been a run off if Kemp would
... not have cheated and knocked off 13000 + mostly democratic votes.
|
Response to aikoaiko (Original post)
Tue May 28, 2019, 03:47 PM
Ilsa (57,566 posts)
4. I hope kemp et al end up crawling back to their holes
with their tails between their legs and balls kicked up into their abdomens.
|
Response to aikoaiko (Original post)
Tue May 28, 2019, 03:48 PM
RANDYWILDMAN (883 posts)
5. Can you believe it....
She mobilized all those uppity people to vote for her and raised all that money and the lovely repubs are going to investigate how she did to make sure nobody can do it again...
![]() The winners write the history or in the case of Georgia, the cheaters write the history |
Response to aikoaiko (Original post)
Tue May 28, 2019, 03:55 PM
rurallib (56,206 posts)
6. Is this a trial test to see if Kemp can do it in Georgia, then Donald
can do it at the federal level?
|
Response to aikoaiko (Original post)
Tue May 28, 2019, 04:04 PM
gratuitous (73,016 posts)
8. Gosh, aren't the Republicans worried about overplaying their hand and turning off swing voters?
Correct, gratuitous. You have control of the board.
I'll finish the category, Alex. Questions You'll Never Hear from the Media for $1000. |
Response to aikoaiko (Original post)
Tue May 28, 2019, 04:05 PM
Kurt V. (5,624 posts)