General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYes, I had hard time following Mueller, with his double and triple negatives
Thus I was grateful, yesterday, to Chuck Todd for putting clips of Barr and of Mueller to compare the nuances in their declaration. No collusion! vs. if we thought he was not guilty of conspiracy we would have said so.
Still, I think that Maher was right: so what if the DOJ says a sitting president cannot be indicted, even hinting - I think - that it would be unconstitutional. Go head, f**k the "rules" indict him.
Also on Chuck Todd, clips of a very young Lindsey Graham explaining why Clinton should be impeached even though it was not clear that he actually broke the law.
"You don't even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job. Impeachment is about cleansing the office, about restoring honor and integrity to the office."
Blues Heron
(5,926 posts)goes against his upper crusty sensibilities, so he hides it with the double negative. Put him under oath and have him answer the questions directly, no weaseling allowed.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,391 posts)I feel like tearing my hair out.
Chin music
(23,002 posts)question everything
(47,423 posts)of re elections. That both Nixon and Clinton were already in their second term so re-election was not a factor. Either way.
Chin music
(23,002 posts)Ever see a policy guideline stop a repub?
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,391 posts)rampartc
(5,382 posts)and I absolutely think we should test that in court.
at the very least it will prove that these azzwholes are "judicial activists" who really don't care what the founders are supposed to have intended.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,800 posts)In the Constitution. But that's the last thing they would have wanted - a tyrant above the law.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,391 posts)*while in office*
I understand that both are different- and occurred under different circumstances- you'd sort of think that if a President would be subject to one, they'd be subject to the other, perhaps moreso if it's a criminal matter?