Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

donkeypoofed

(2,187 posts)
2. Agreed ! Most people absolutely need to hear & see them
Sat Jun 1, 2019, 05:07 PM
Jun 2019

Their testimony will change minds, and more importantly, votes ! Plus it will take that particular bat away from Spanky.

emmaverybo

(8,144 posts)
4. I'd like to see testify all those who had contacts with Russians or Russia-connected sources like
Sat Jun 1, 2019, 05:50 PM
Jun 2019

Erik Prince, Jared Kushner, etc. etc. etc.
It’s not so much the report that needs questioning as the leads the investigation uncovered that House Intel should follow up on. Doing so would certainly dramatize an essential part of the report.

We don’t need to authenticate the report, open investigators to Con’s ridiculous grilling, grandstanding, and attempt to discredit them or their work.

The House must use the report as a roadmap to its own hearings. To do that they need only the document and they must get hold of the evidence turned up during the probe.





scarytomcat

(1,706 posts)
5. the "witch hunt" as it has been called was by angry dems
Sat Jun 1, 2019, 05:56 PM
Jun 2019

I want to know if any body on Mueller's staff was a democrat. I also think they can give us insight into how they did the job. Mueller should testify and answer question about process. We know he is a rethug.

emmaverybo

(8,144 posts)
6. So? What are you insinuating? Yes, we know he's a Republican and that members of his team have
Sat Jun 1, 2019, 06:18 PM
Jun 2019

donated to democratic candidates.
Did you want to establish a flawed or politically compromised process was used in arriving at the decision not to charge Trump with conspiracy or obstruction?
Why go backwards?
I doubt the Dem House is in on that fight, wants to argue about findings. Impeachment standard of proof is not the same as the criminal standard.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The 12 angry dems that wo...