Why don't media interviews of trumpanzees include the question "Where do you get your info?

[diva77]

That's what's dividing the country more than anything else -- wingnutism propelled by wingnut media. Non-trumpanzees should also be asked that question, to be fair (and get out the word as to where non-wingnut, fact-based media can be found).

It's apples and oranges to say that impeachment will be too divisive, imho.

[ProudLib72]

1. Facebook, 4Chan, Infowars

Or "I just heard somewhere from somebody, but that doesn't mean it isn't credible!"

[diva77]

3. ugh, more sources of wingnut thought contamination.

never heard of "4Chan" - I don't think I wanna know...

[NewJeffCT]

13. I thought it was 8chan now?

or something like that, or is that a more RW version of 4chan?

[brewens]

8. I was going to object and say leading question. "Info" would steer them into saying Infowars! n/t

[diva77]

9. good point - I was trying to squeeze as many letters into the title space as poss.

The word "info" is probably pavlovian to wingnutties and makes them think of Infowars -- I would prefer that the interviewer say "information"

[brewens]

10. Not that I felt the leading question would get an inaccurate response. n/t

[democratisphere]

2. drumpf's gut.

[diva77]

4. or just around the corner

[exboyfil]

5. Lower

but you are right about the particular biological system.

[democratisphere]

6. drumpf's nut.

Damn autocorrect.

[Initech]

7. Breitbart, Infowars, Daily Caller

[Karadeniz]

11. That should be S.O.P.!

[diva77]

12. Amen!

[NewJeffCT]

14. the problem is 80% of the people don't know

Infowars, Breitbart, Daily Caller, etc are RW conspiracy theory whacko places.