Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

blm

(113,061 posts)
Tue Jun 18, 2019, 08:37 PM Jun 2019

Copy and use this to highlight WHY the GOP pushes its anti-intellectual agenda.

"There was no point in seeking to convert the intellectuals. For intellectuals would never be converted and would anyway always yield to the stronger, and this will always be 'the man in the street.' Arguments must therefore be crude, clear and forcible, and appeal to emotions and instincts, not the intellect. Truth was unimportant and entirely subordinate to tactics and psychology." –Joseph Goebbels

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Copy and use this to highlight WHY the GOP pushes its anti-intellectual agenda. (Original Post) blm Jun 2019 OP
Gives true meaning to the term, "Evil Genius". procon Jun 2019 #1
GOP has been attacking intellectualism since the 80s. blm Jun 2019 #2
Yeah, they completely flipped their platform. procon Jun 2019 #3
Since long before the 80s LastDemocratInSC Jun 2019 #4
The Kochs took a lot of shit for the JBS and their dad. I guess they're having the last laugh now. TheBlackAdder Jun 2019 #5
Do we remember Spirro Agnew's "Efite Snobs"? Thunderbeast Jun 2019 #6
After reading Wrapped in the Flag by Claire Conner I realized rusty quoin Jun 2019 #7
This exactly. They did not... Whiskeytide Jun 2019 #9
The Powell memorandum Kid Berwyn Jun 2019 #8
"Their long-term focus began paying off handsomely in the 1980s,..." CrispyQ Jun 2019 #11
K&R smirkymonkey Jun 2019 #10

procon

(15,805 posts)
1. Gives true meaning to the term, "Evil Genius".
Tue Jun 18, 2019, 08:59 PM
Jun 2019

I doubt Trump even knows who Goebbels was, let alone read any of his propaganda techniques. Yet Trump's thinking is identical, clearly he is his brother by another mother.

blm

(113,061 posts)
2. GOP has been attacking intellectualism since the 80s.
Tue Jun 18, 2019, 09:02 PM
Jun 2019

Trump took advantage of that agenda when it was at its peak.

procon

(15,805 posts)
3. Yeah, they completely flipped their platform.
Tue Jun 18, 2019, 09:28 PM
Jun 2019

As a young woman I recall asking my stoic Republican dad about the differences between the two parties.

He told me that the GOP was the party of intellect, science, scholarship and vision. Democrats were more given to emotional needs, instant gratification and short term goals. He didn't tell me that Republicans were also sexist, patriarchal, greedy and elitist, but it was the 'Mad Men' era and that was the prefeminist norm.

That all swapped around after the civil rights act passed, and Republicans added racism to their platform.

LastDemocratInSC

(3,647 posts)
4. Since long before the 80s
Tue Jun 18, 2019, 10:03 PM
Jun 2019

I remember the know-nothing John Birchers in my hometown in the 50s and 60s.

 

rusty quoin

(6,133 posts)
7. After reading Wrapped in the Flag by Claire Conner I realized
Tue Jun 18, 2019, 11:36 PM
Jun 2019

that the Republicans had become The John Birch Society.

Whiskeytide

(4,461 posts)
9. This exactly. They did not...
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 12:27 PM
Jun 2019

... go away. They just went under cover until they could co-op the Republican Party.

Kid Berwyn

(14,904 posts)
8. The Powell memorandum
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 12:20 PM
Jun 2019

If I may add to this great post and thread:



The Powell Memo (also known as the Powell Manifesto)

The Powell Memo was first published August 23, 1971

Introduction

In 1971, Lewis Powell, then a corporate lawyer and member of the boards of 11 corporations, wrote a memo to his friend Eugene Sydnor, Jr., the Director of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The memorandum was dated August 23, 1971, two months prior to Powell’s nomination by President Nixon to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Powell Memo did not become available to the public until long after his confirmation to the Court. It was leaked to Jack Anderson, a liberal syndicated columnist, who stirred interest in the document when he cited it as reason to doubt Powell’s legal objectivity. [font color="red"]Anderson cautioned that Powell “might use his position on the Supreme Court to put his ideas into practice…in behalf of business interests.”[/font color]

Though Powell’s memo was not the sole influence, the Chamber and corporate activists took his advice to heart and began building a powerful array of institutions designed to shift public attitudes and beliefs over the course of years and decades. The memo influenced or inspired the creation of the Heritage Foundation, the Manhattan Institute, the Cato Institute, Citizens for a Sound Economy, Accuracy in Academe, and other powerful organizations. Their long-term focus began paying off handsomely in the 1980s, in coordination with the Reagan Administration’s “hands-off business” philosophy.

Most notable about these institutions was their focus on education, shifting values, and movement-building — a focus we share, though often with sharply contrasting goals.* (See our endnote for more on this.)

So did Powell’s political views influence his judicial decisions? The evidence is mixed. [font color="red"]Powell did embrace expansion of corporate privilege and wrote the majority opinion in First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, a 1978 decision that effectively invented a First Amendment “right” for corporations to influence ballot questions.[/font color] On social issues, he was a moderate, whose votes often surprised his backers.

CONTINUED...

http://reclaimdemocracy.org/powell_memo_lewis/



Critical history of propaganda written by the guy who schooled Chomsky, Australian sociologist Alex Carey:

“The 20th century is marked by three historic developments: the growth of democracy via the expansion of the franchise, the growth of corporations, and the growth of propaganda to protect corporations from democracy.”



Alex Carey: Corporations and Propaganda

The Attack on Democracy


The 20th century, said Carey, is marked by three historic developments: the growth of democracy via the expansion of the franchise, the growth of corporations, and the growth of propaganda to protect corporations from democracy. Carey wrote that the people of the US have been subjected to an unparalleled, expensive, 3/4 century long propaganda effort designed to expand corporate rights by undermining democracy and destroying the unions. And, in his manuscript, unpublished during his life time, he described that history, going back to World War I and ending with the Reagan era. Carey covers the little known role of the US Chamber of Commerce in the McCarthy witch hunts of post WWII and shows how the continued campaign against "Big Government" plays an important role in bringing Reagan to power.

John Pilger called Carey "a second Orwell", Noam Chomsky dedicated his book, Manufacturing Consent, to him. And even though TUC Radio runs our documentary based on Carey's manuscript at least every two years and draws a huge response each time, Alex Carey is still unknown.

Given today's spotlight on corporations that may change. It is not only the Occupy movement that inspired me to present this program again at this time. By an amazing historic coincidence Bill Moyers and Charlie Cray of Greenpeace have just added the missing chapter to Carey's analysis. Carey's manuscript ends in 1988 when he committed suicide. Moyers and Cray begin with 1971 and bring the corporate propaganda project up to date.

This is a fairly complex production with many voices, historic sound clips, and source material. The program has been used by writers and students of history and propaganda. Alex Carey: Taking the Risk out of Democracy, Corporate Propaganda VS Freedom and Liberty with a foreword by Noam Chomsky was published by the University of Illinois Press in 1995.

SOURCE: http://tucradio.org/new.html



Truth is what Democracies crave.

CrispyQ

(36,464 posts)
11. "Their long-term focus began paying off handsomely in the 1980s,..."
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 01:30 PM
Jun 2019

"Most notable about these institutions was their focus on education, shifting values, and movement-building..."

Hmmm, what else was going on in the 80s? Oh yeah. Hate radio. They funded think tanks to craft their message & bought up radio stations to broadcast it. And now we have Americans wearing tee-shirts that read "I'd rather be a Russian than a Democrat."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Copy and use this to high...