Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dennis Donovan

(18,770 posts)
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 09:54 AM Jun 2019

Joyce Vance; She isn't his wife, his priest & no privilege covers her knowledge of criminal conduct



Joyce Alene ✔ @JoyceWhiteVance

Trump is desperate to avoid having Hicks answer questions about crimes-obstruction of justice & campaign finance violations. She isn’t his wife or his priest & no privilege covers her knowledge of criminal conduct. https://www.thedailybeast.com/white-house-counsel-hope-hicks-is-immune-from-questions-about-her-time-in-trump-administration

9:17 AM - Jun 19, 2019


And today is the big day!!
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Joyce Vance; She isn't his wife, his priest & no privilege covers her knowledge of criminal conduct (Original Post) Dennis Donovan Jun 2019 OP
Her lawyer will tell her what to say watoos Jun 2019 #1
If her lawyer is HER lawyer, and not Trump's-- dawg day Jun 2019 #5
Ditto elleng Jun 2019 #16
yeah, they werent her lawyers. mopinko Jun 2019 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2019 #26
You know what's interesting is that I remember Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2019 #27
Not if a decent lawyer representing HER. elleng Jun 2019 #15
It's a White House attorney Mossfern Jun 2019 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2019 #28
Didn't Hope help Trump write the "it was all about adoption" cover story about the meeting @ Botany Jun 2019 #2
She was ironing his inseam at that moment. redstatebluegirl Jun 2019 #6
She's not going give up anything tenderfoot Jun 2019 #3
Going to have to water board her watoos Jun 2019 #4
She has a WH lawyer advising her leftieNanner Jun 2019 #7
The Power of Pretty dawg day Jun 2019 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2019 #29
Immune? NewJeffCT Jun 2019 #8
Kind of like being "conflicted." Trump doesn't know what these words mean. (n/t) thesquanderer Jun 2019 #11
The truth is a disease. You need immunity from it. LuvNewcastle Jun 2019 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2019 #30
While True DallasNE Jun 2019 #9
This is my hope. Delmette2.0 Jun 2019 #13
Sounds like a good idea. elleng Jun 2019 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2019 #31
Joyce Vance saidsimplesimon Jun 2019 #12
Will transcripts of hearing be published? Sneederbunk Jun 2019 #14
They are supposed to be Lulu KC Jun 2019 #19
perfect ;-) BamaRefugee Jun 2019 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2019 #32
I love Joyce Vance Vegas Roller Jun 2019 #24
She may have been his wife in practice, if not law Maru Kitteh Jun 2019 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2019 #33
She didn't give up anything SHRED Jun 2019 #34
Is there Handmaid privilege? GreenPartyVoter Jun 2019 #35

dawg day

(7,947 posts)
5. If her lawyer is HER lawyer, and not Trump's--
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 11:02 AM
Jun 2019

He should tell her to tell the truth. I don't know why anyone would risk a perjury charge for that nasty slug Trump.

mopinko

(70,103 posts)
23. yeah, they werent her lawyers.
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 11:08 PM
Jun 2019

they were white house lawyers, and they should be fucking disbarred.

Response to dawg day (Reply #5)

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
10. You know what's interesting is that I remember
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 11:41 AM
Jun 2019

reading that her friends and family wanted her away from Dipshit. Thought it was hurting her. Like she might not be Sarah-like-wacked-out.

But then I think, if she had serious bombshell dirt, she would have told Mueller? Or he would have indicted her? That's what I don't get about these hearings of people Mueller already wrung out. They are gonna tell Congress something that they didn't tell Mueller?

Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Reply #10)

Mossfern

(2,502 posts)
18. It's a White House attorney
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 12:04 PM
Jun 2019

and I think it's a form of intimidation to Hicks. (more obstruction) She knows that there will be consequences if the WH lawyer lets Trump know that she 'ratted' on him. I'm not expecting anything out of this.

Response to Mossfern (Reply #18)

Botany

(70,504 posts)
2. Didn't Hope help Trump write the "it was all about adoption" cover story about the meeting @
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 10:15 AM
Jun 2019

Trump Tower in June of 2016 where the Russians promised to work with the Trump
Campaign and to get dirt on Hillary and that would be obstruction of justice.

I hope fear of prison makes Ms. Hicks speak the truth but I doubt that it will happen.

leftieNanner

(15,100 posts)
7. She has a WH lawyer advising her
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 11:26 AM
Jun 2019

And he is objecting to nearly everything that is being asked. Don't know if anything meaningful will come out of this.

dawg day

(7,947 posts)
22. The Power of Pretty
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 01:13 PM
Jun 2019

Seriously, if she weren't Melania-lite pretty, all shiny hair and gleaming smile, I doubt everyone would be treating her with kid-gloves, and I don't think she would have gotten her fabbo new job.

I just have to point out that she has horrid taste in men:
Corey Lewandowski (reporter-shover)
Rob Portman (domestic abuser)
Donald Trump (serial predator)

And now she's letting Trump decide who "represents her". She'll probably suffer no consequences from lying, but if she does, somehow I doubt Trump is going to help.

Response to dawg day (Reply #22)

Response to NewJeffCT (Reply #8)

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
9. While True
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 11:40 AM
Jun 2019

A Whitehouse attorney will be present and they will probably talk more than Hicks. It may require that the attorney be expelled from the hearing (or be given a gag order). They are not counsel to the witness (Hicks) so why not?

Delmette2.0

(4,165 posts)
13. This is my hope.
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 11:47 AM
Jun 2019

I would think she has gotten an independent attorney and the WH advisor will be kicked out of the closed door hearing.

Response to DallasNE (Reply #9)

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
12. Joyce Vance
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 11:46 AM
Jun 2019

is an excellent source. I really appreciate the way she explains the existing law and covers "the short digit vulgarian".

Lulu KC

(2,565 posts)
19. They are supposed to be
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 12:31 PM
Jun 2019

From what I can see on Twitter, they will read like this:
Question: Anything?
Answer: OBJECTION!


Response to Sneederbunk (Reply #14)

Response to Maru Kitteh (Reply #25)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Joyce Vance; She isn't hi...