Regarding SCOTUS giving partisan Gerrymandering their blessing: Non-Clinton voters,

[Still In Wisconsin]

YOU OWN THIS. All of it. Every last one of you "principled" Stein voters, Bernie-or-busters, and I'm sitting this one out-ers, this is on you. It's 100 percent your fault when Democrats get more votes yet lose House seats. Ditto for every state legislature that goes Republican in a state won overall by Democrats. And a big hearty FUCK YOU from me, personally.

[Wellstone ruled]

1. You and I really picked a Scab today

with this comment. Nailed them earlier.

[Goodheart]

2. Amen.

[kimbutgar]

3. We have to make sure a Democratic Governor is elected in 2020 to stop these gerrymandering maps

By repukes.

[Still In Wisconsin]

4. Good thought, but not going to help those of us in states with Republican Supreme Courts.

Reason: in cases of divided government (such as Wisconsin which has a Democratic Governor but Republican state legislature) new maps will be drawn by...guess who... the state Supreme Court. And the current Wisconsin Supreme Court has a 5-2 Republican majority, thanks to Wisconsin Democrats' unwillingness to get off their asses and vote in spring elections.

[betsuni]

5. K&R

[mcar]

6. Yep

[Maru Kitteh]

7. K and effing R

[3catwoman3]

8. The Supreme Court, in and of itself, was reason enough...

...to vote for HRC, no matter what deficiencies one might have thought her to have. And all the rest of the judicial appointments. I will never forgive any of those turncoats.