General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMAD Magazine Is Winding Down And Fans Are Devastated
The iconic comic has been around for nearly 70 years.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/mad-magazine-winding-down_n_5d1da141e4b04c48140eed2e
The magazine known for its gap-toothed mascot Alfred E. Neuman and his what, me worry? slogan has been published for nearly 70 years.
Newsstand circulation will come to an end after the August issue, per The Hollywood Reporter. Subscribers and comic shops will continue to receive MAD, but starting in the fall those issues will feature old material repackaged with new covers.
In what may be a small silver lining, publisher DC plans to produce end-of-the-year editions with new material, MAD books and special collections, THR reported.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
superpatriotman
(6,882 posts)Along with SNL, Monty Python, Wacky Packs and Saturday morning cartoons.
mortuus est satura...
Zoonart
(14,611 posts)Loved MAD.
Dennis Donovan
(31,059 posts)Gen-Xer?
superpatriotman
(6,882 posts)But, whatever...I dont care.
ananda
(35,482 posts)Yes, satire is indeed dying.
spike jones
(2,026 posts)From 1988
The source of a 13-year-old prank in stained glass at the University of Washington in Seattle, has been uncovered: The architect did it.
University spokesman Tom Griffin says architect David Wright is responsible for a portrait of George Washington at the school's Health Sciences cafeteria that bears the inscription, "Num Me Vexo?"For non-Latin scholars, that means, "What, Me Worry?" And, yes, it was inspired by Alfred E. Neuman, the grinning, big-eared symbol of Mad magazine. Wright was the designer of the south campus center where the stained glass portrait of Washington hangs.
Griffin's research answered questions raised by a weekly newspaper story that called "Num Me Vexo?" the strangest Latin inscription in Seattle. Griffin said the inscription came about because students wanted a picture of a revolutionary there. Washington was selected and "Num Me Vexo?" was Wright's contribution. Wright said he was pleased his joke was finally discovered.
hlthe2b
(114,640 posts)superpatriotman
(6,882 posts)It would be just like MAD to publish an entire issue in Latin!
Mme. Defarge
(9,049 posts)when I was a grade schooler in the sleepy little community I lived in.
Ive be amazed throughout the years over how true it has been to its mission and standards. In its own way it played a role as a moral conscience for our society. Now I say, Well done, good and faithful servant!
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Wish I still had my Wacky Packs collection from the 70's ... bet it'd be worth something now, had a few rare ones ... lost 'em in a move somewhere (or maybe they're deep in my folks attic, not 100% on that).
tblue37
(68,448 posts)Are_grits_groceries
(17,139 posts)I grew up in SC in the Sixties and early seventies. MAD taught me snark and satire. It saved me from the trollery of the rightwing.
I fully believe it was one of the most important publications in a tumultuous time.
What, me worry?
Alfred E. Neuman. 🐐
malaise
(297,865 posts)Happy 4th sis
Are_grits_groceries
(17,139 posts)malaise
(297,865 posts)calimary
(90,735 posts)our monthly MAD.
BUMMER. Thats quite a cherry on top of todays 4th-of-July shit sundae.
I loved MAD Magazine! All that artwork. All that cartooning. All those itty bitty drawings in the margins. Every back inside cover that you folded up just do - to reveal a completely different point from the original unfolded image. So damn clever!
Damn.
Just damn.
Duppers
(28,476 posts)And my experience was identical. (Posted below before reading the thread.)
former9thward
(33,424 posts)They have been trained by the internet to think everything should be free. Countless newspapers and magazines have gone under. Mad is just one more.
Turin_C3PO
(16,385 posts)to think things like that should be free due to the internet. Hardly anyone is supporting magazines and newspapers anymore, young and old alike.
Its a shame, were losing a lot of great writing.
True Dough
(27,265 posts)The immediacy of information has never been better but the analysis and scrutiny of what's happening at the local level is getting thinner and thinner because reporters, especially investigative reporters, are becoming an endangered species. Lack of revenue is the culprit.
murielm99
(33,081 posts)that is somewhat local, a daily. I need something to keep up with state and local affairs.
It is no longer owned by a local group, and has become increasingly right wing. It has a few liberal columnists who get into the paper on a somewhat regular rotation. I have not written to the paper in a long time, and that is overdue, especially with the 2020 election coming up. They publish my letters and guest columns because I am a subscriber.
I am in regular communication with the local liberal columnists, who are a married pair of retired teachers.
We need some way to keep up with local and state events. I buy our weekly local paper, too. That is not locally owned any more, either.
We can keep reading and supporting these things because we need them. But we can demand better content.
True Dough
(27,265 posts)Readers play an important part in keeping print journalists (and all media) fair, balanced and accurate. That's the way it should be.
superpatriotman
(6,882 posts)To the mimeograph! Fight the power!
murielm99
(33,081 posts)We need social media, like it or not.
Mimeographs must be valuable antiques by now.
True Dough
(27,265 posts)and it's sad to see.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Twenty years ago, I had to have my daily Dallas Morning News. That is the way I got my news. It was 50 cents and was very thick.
Over the years the pages have shrunk in size and number. And the price has risen to $2. No way I am paying that.
IMO, most paper newspapers and magazines will cease to exist and be online only.
Aristus
(72,509 posts)It's not young people who put the content out there for free. It was the creators of the content.
Why dump on the people who simply got used to things being a certain way?
The internet simply created a new way to monetize periodical publications. Hearst and Pulitzer created media empires not from the nominal cost of their newspapers, but by the revenue generated by selling advertising space. They only charged the 2-3 cents per edition (at the height of their newspaper empires) so the reader would feel he was getting something of value.
On-line content providers can put their publications out there for free, and still expect generous revenue from advertisers who appear on the publishers' web pages.
It's just a new way of doing the same old thing.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)"It's just a new way of doing the same old thing." Reality is otherwise. Mass numbers of newspapers and magazines have gone out of business. So the same old thing is not being done. Especially local reporting and investigative reporting. That has become practically non-existent. The internet "news" operates in 24 hour cycles. There is no way Watergate style investigative reporting which took months and years to piece together could ever happen with a internet based news operation.
Aristus
(72,509 posts)They went out of business when competitor publications bought them out and closed them down, the better to decrease the competition for subscribers. Also guilty are the people who repealed the media-fairness laws that prohibited a conglomerate from owning more than one television station or newspaper in a single media market.
This is all by way of saying that this still can't be laid at the door of young people who are accustomed to free online content.
klook
(13,647 posts)They were a huge part of my life, and I still read it from time to time. Theyve published several hilarious Trump pieces, going farther into the political realm in recent years.

superpatriotman
(6,882 posts)Publisher
klook
(13,647 posts)To me his image is iconic, so I forgot not everyone might recognize him.
I was trying to find this hilarious picture of Gaines and one of the other principals (Harvey Kurtzman?) in a fitness ad parody where they were lying shirtless on their sides and pretending to do exercises. The sight of these two guys, not exactly gym gods, acting like they were in a Playgirl spread or something was a scream!
Here's a cover from 1971 that's once again fitting:
?w=710
lpbk2713
(43,295 posts)I feel particularly old right now.
But then ---- What? Me worry?
KPN
(17,504 posts)True Dough
(27,265 posts)There were three drawers in the side. Those drawers contained MAD magazines, wrestling magazines, Archie comics and Choose Your Own Adventure books. I would read every night before bed.
Of course if I were a youngster today, I'd be going to bed with a phone or tablet in hand. That's just the way it is.
FakeNoose
(42,365 posts)Still it's sad to see these guys stop the regular periodicals. It seems the customers are mostly the old-fogey types like us who grew up with MAD. The young kids aren't so interested, when there are so many other possibilities for entertainment. Reading MAD regularly is a challenge to keep up with news, politics, current events, social happenings etc.
Marthe48
(23,416 posts)I still have the gift subscription letter Mad sent to my Dad. My Mom got it as a Christmas present for him. I hope sarcasm, irony and parody are not dead.
AllaN01Bear
(29,785 posts)RobertDevereaux
(2,045 posts)Dear MAD Magazine, my thanks for raising us incipient renegades right!
MineralMan
(151,532 posts)My parents wouldn't have it in the house, and told me I was not allowed to buy it. They didn't know that the local public library subscribed to it, along with many other magazines. So, I read it at the library. When I was in high school, I asked the librarian why they subscribed to it. The answer was simple, "It is popular with library patrons and our job is to make popular publications available."
Very sensible policy, I thought.
Auggie
(33,309 posts)It's in PDF form, sloppy scans (lower in resolution than they should be), but still funny and relevant today as it was 60 years ago. Brings back many memories. I'm glad I bought it.
This awesome artwork blew me away as a 12 year old. I still have the original article.

58Sunliner
(6,406 posts)Critical thinking and funny.
no_hypocrisy
(55,349 posts)IronLionZion
(51,540 posts)a tale of two comedy publications, both started in the 50s. Cracked ceased their print version 12 years ago and went all in on the online version. The Onion ceased their print version 6 years ago. Younger generations know Cracked, but Mayor Pete had to google who Alfred E. Neuman was to respond to Trump's insult, which fell flat because Mad fans like Alfred E. Neuman. It's generational and the economy is changing. Some of my coworkers find it ludicrous that I still buy books for travel or training when it's available online.
How many DUers subscribe to Mad magazine? I own some of their books that were from before I was born.
thesquanderer
(13,104 posts)As you pointed out, there are numerous publications that have ceased the printing and distribution of paper copies, but continue to generate new content online. Mad is doing the opposite... keeping the expensive printing and distribution of hard copies, but eliminating the new content.
Boxerfan
(2,571 posts)We also just got our favorite uncle (her big brother) a subscription.
This actually is sad news and Mad was still relevant in satire & artwork.
Historic NY
(40,124 posts)sellitman
(11,748 posts)Truly why I am the way I am.
Now instead of Mad I am Sad.
Duppers
(28,476 posts)It's was one of the foundation blocks of my childhood, one of the things that helped me counteract my RW family's influence. But kids today have more sites online, so there's really no excuse for any of them to grow up with RW opinions.
😞
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)hlthe2b
(114,640 posts)sigh

Cirque du So-What
(29,879 posts)dameatball
(7,671 posts)channels in the late 50's, early 60's, but getting the latest copy of Mad was an enlightening and enriching journey behind the scenes of the life we were all meandering through, something that went beyond the usual media we were exposed to. Along with the laughs, there was never a single issue that didn't make you stop and say "Hmmmm."
I remember when my older brother brought home the first copy I ever saw. Probably one of the earliest years if not the first. My dad was outraged and confiscated it. But it didn't matter. Every month my brother bought the latest issue and I loved it from cover to cover. And I wouldn't be surprised if dad sneaked a read himself.
.....
.....
dameatball
(7,671 posts)We bought ours at the local convenience store. I remember that it was displayed separately from the comic books which I think made parents more leery of it. Once my parents realized what it was they were fine with it.
eleny
(46,176 posts)And definitely not displayed near my beloved Little Lulu comics!
oasis
(53,950 posts)my local drug store. Without fail.
Thank you for all the gems, MAD artists and writers.
Bradshaw3
(7,964 posts)And many others, especially those who grew up in conservative, religious areas who valued input and satire from other sources. I think MAD was a modern version of the satirical publications that proliferated before the French Revolution. I remember my mother telling me it was Communist back in the early 60s - which of course made it rebellious to read. If you were a smartass who saw behind the BS of conformity MAD was not just funny but a guiding light. As were the Smothers Brothers a little later, and then Rolling Stone.
JohnnyRingo
(20,989 posts)Though I "graduated" to National Lampoon in the years after high school, Mad formed the basis for my cynical sense of humor.
yaesu
(9,448 posts)wish I would have now.
nolabear
(43,850 posts)MAD was a coming-of-age tradition. Juvenile, puerile, take no prisoners and oh, so funny. Spy-vs-Spy, What Me Worry, those folding back covers, parodies of everything revered. Hiding it from the grownups was heaven.
Forget peace. Rest in Weird. ❤️
sarge43
(29,173 posts)You taught us how to snark and calibrated our crap detectors.
You will not be forgotten.
maddiemom
(5,206 posts)(more recently,too, I'll admit). In later years, I've most remembered some of the running gags that were slyly inserted into completely unrelated parodies. For instance: when the original series "The Fugitive," was very popular, you'd often see Richard Kimble (David Janssen) sneaking by in the background or peering out from behind something...it was those little things...!
shanti
(21,805 posts)my dad used to buy Mad. My favorite toon was Spy vs Spy. I'm really surprised that they lasted this long!
Totally Tunsie
(12,009 posts)Sure, I can fold the back page of AARP Real Possibilities, but it just won't be the same!
Alfie, how can you leave us when we need you more than evahhhh?
Yes, I'll worry!
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Probably the only reading material I ever 'spent my own money on' as a 9-13 y.o. kid. I particularly remember the parody of Star Wars issue ... although I'd read other people's copies for years, I think this was the first one I bought ...

Codeine
(25,586 posts)if they had bothered to purchase the damned thing.
I think everyone likes the IDEA of Mad Magazine but they arent bothering to subscribe or grab one off the rack because its no longer of any real cultural relevance.