General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMilitary vet drops the hammer on 'wannabe strongman' Trump's love of obsolete tanks
Published 1 min ago on July 4, 2019
By Tom Boggioni
In a column for the New York Times, a veteran who served in Iraq while a member of the Virginia Army National Guard mocked Donald Trump for using tanks at his Fourth of July Mall spectacle, saying they are a relic of the past while ridiculing the commander in chief as a wannabe strongman.
According to Elliott Woods, based upon his training taking out tanks during military conflicts, the choice of the armored vehicles as a sign of strength is now laughable but the president seems to be unaware of the fact.
With a few exceptions the invasion of Iraq in 2003, the battle of Falluja in 2004 the tank has become as irrelevant to modern warfare as the horse cavalry it replaced, he wrote. So what are we supposed to make of President Trumps fascination with these hulking relics and his determination to display them in Washington during Thursdays Fourth of July celebration?
Mr. Trump seems to see tanks as a symbol of military strength, of Americas ability to bend the world to its will by means of brute force and threats of fire and fury,' he added. Having avoided service in the Vietnam War by way of draft deferments, Mr. Trump has presumably never been closer to warfare than has a child playing on the floor with toy tanks and green plastic army men.
More:
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/07/military-vet-drops-the-hammer-on-wannabe-strongman-trumps-love-of-obsolete-tanks/?utm_source=push_notifications
area51
(12,691 posts)
hot2na
(458 posts)mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)Perseus
(4,341 posts)To open soon..."Buffoon's Antique Stores"
Fudging idiot, doesn't know anything, just evil.
Victor_c3
(3,557 posts)Tanks and Brads might be relics of the past, but I wouldnt trade them for the vehicles the replaced them with. I had two tanks attached to my platoon when I was in Iraq and they saved my ass more times than I wish to recount. The supposed modern alternatives to theses relics of the past arent anywhere near as survivable.
Have problems with a sniper? Just destroy the building with one of your tanks. Tanks were also great for drawing fire from an undisciplined enemy. These guys would shoot small arms, RPGs, and even SPGs at my tanks all day long and they would do little to no damage.
While in the Army I wrote a number of professional articles about the usefulness of heavy armor assets and I still stand behind every word of what I wrote. The generals that say things contrary to what I experienced firsthand are thoroughly removed from the realities of combat. The contractors they were hoping to gain favor with when the left the military certainly make more money by selling new equipment over keeping an older piece of equipment alive through periodic upgrades.
For what its worth, I was an Infantry Platoon Leader in Iraq in 2004.
NJCher
(43,164 posts)thank you for your perspective.
I'm not a fan of anything military, but in certain situations, I see that what you say could be just the ticket.

FakeNoose
(41,631 posts)Do you think he listened then? Hell no! He's just an idiot who doesn't listen to anybody.

Response to FakeNoose (Reply #7)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
hibbing
(10,597 posts)And the crowd cheers!!
malaise
(296,098 posts)Mr. Trump seems to see tanks as a symbol of military strength, of Americas ability to bend the world to its will by means of brute force and threats of fire and fury,' he added. Having avoided service in the Vietnam War by way of draft deferments, Mr. Trump has presumably never been closer to warfare than has a child playing on the floor with toy tanks and green plastic army men.
eppur_se_muova
(41,939 posts)malaise
(296,098 posts)It's alll toys to him