Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTPM Josh Marshall - "A Few Thoughts on the Acosta Presser" (worth a read)
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/a-few-thoughts-on-the-acosta-presserBy Josh Marshall
July 10, 2019 4:13 pm
I watched the Acosta presser live all the way through and heres my take.
I found watching this Q&A weird and a bit baffling. Im not an expert on the intricacies of this case. So probably like many others I wasnt in a great position to evaluate all the factual claims, at least not in real time. What was jarring was that I had a general sense that Acostas office had allowed Epstein to get a pretty lenient deal, probably at least in part because he was a super wealthy, super connected guy and had the best lawyers working on his behalf. This would hardly be the first or only time such a thing has happened. But watching Acosta talk about it, suddenly it was like contrary to all that, everyone else was dropping the ball particularly the state prosecutor and Acosta was almost like the hero of the story.
Not notifying the victims of the deal? Well, he had an answer for that: he was protecting them from knowledge of restitution that could be used against them later. Cushy imprisonment? Well, that was out of his hands. He ever had affidavits from the career prosecutor and lead FBI agent apparently backing him up. (These were distributed to press at the beginning of the presser. So without time to read and absorb them during the presser itself.) Indeed, whatever else you can say about Acosta, theres no denying he took questions. Indeed, he wouldnt stop. He kept saying he was finishing up and then answering yet more questions. They could barely get him to shut up.
On all these points, it was pretty hard to believe it could really be such a night and day thing. But not knowing the details it was hard for me at least to zero in on what points Acosta was misstating. Because of that I was basically waiting to hear expert responses or at least responses from people deeply versed in the case.
They werent long in coming.
Having listened now to some of that commentary, it seems like it was pretty much a dodge as I figured it had to be but didnt know the details as to why. To me, the biggest shortcoming in his argument was the idea that he had to make a deal at all. As a number of commentators have pointed out, Acostas argument was that he was presented with a situation in which the state was going to let Epstein off with a slap on the wrist and he had to step in and try to make sure there was at least a threshold level of accountability, by which he meant some jail time and registration as a sex offender.
The problem is that the other option was simply to keep investigating and making the case strong enough to bring to trial to the extent it was a roll of the dice going to trial.
Beyond this it was also clear the audience here was Trump. Acosta had what I can only call a no apologies, cocky affect and he repeatedly went in for digs at the press for not doing their job. This seemed like his version of appealing to Trumps never apologize, be a counter puncher mantra. Through a lot of the presser he had what seemed like this slight grin on his face. Things only really got weird when he wordily declined to deny reports about being told to back off prosecuting Epstein.
Like Bill Barrs notorious letter, this seems like the kind of performance that will never be better than it was the moment it ended. All downhill from there.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2634 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (29)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TPM Josh Marshall - "A Few Thoughts on the Acosta Presser" (worth a read) (Original Post)
NRaleighLiberal
Jul 2019
OP
luvtheGWN
(1,336 posts)1. As a registered sex offender,
why have other countries allowed him to enter? Surely they don't want sex offenders in their country.
Caliman73
(11,742 posts)2. Other countries are not obligated to abide by our internal laws.
I agree that they would likely not want sex offenders in their countries, but that information is not typically available to customs agents unless the person is convicted in their jurisdiction as well.
MontanaMama
(23,334 posts)3. Good point.
My guess us that somebody got paid...or invited to a calendar girl party or both...or worse.
Mr.Bill
(24,312 posts)4. I think I read that New York
let him register as a far lower level sex offender. Maybe he uses that status to get visas for other countries.
I think the telling point will be if they let him out on bail. If they do, then the fix is in. No way in the real world does someone accused of these kind of crimes usually get bail.