General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSuburban women recoil as Trump dives into racial politics
API just dont like the way he talks about other people, Evans, a 79-year-old retired data entry supervisor, said recently as she walked through a shopping mall in Brookfield, Wisconsin, days after Trump fired off a racist tweet at Democratic congresswomen.
The presidents recent return to racial politics may be aimed at rallying his base of white working-class voters across rural America. But the risks of the strategy are glaring in conversations with women like Evans.
Many professional, suburban women a critical voting bloc in the 2020 election recoil at the abrasive, divisive rhetoric, exposing the president to a potential wave of opposition in key battlegrounds across the country.
In more than three dozen interviews by The Associated Press with women in critical suburbs, nearly all expressed dismay or worse at Trumps racially polarizing insults and what was often described as unpresidential treatment of people. Even some who gave Trump credit for the economy or backed his crackdown on immigration acknowledged they were troubled or uncomfortable lining up behind the president.
no_hypocrisy
(46,035 posts)mercuryblues
(14,525 posts)that the racist, misogynist man they voted for is really, really, really racist & misogynistic. But still may vote for him.
I don't care what their excuses are for voting for him. It is just that...an excuse to cover their racism and misogyny. Yes, these are woman who think they are far superior to other women.
SharonAnn
(13,771 posts)We know that once a man starts "labeling" others, we're somewhere in the line of "others" to be labeled and discriminated against.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)for him.
tblue37
(65,227 posts)from the rooftops, so it's harder to pretend you haven't heard him saying such things.
Afromania
(2,768 posts)Open about it is a bridge too far. Can't have people KNOWING they're racist or racist adjacent. I suppose it's good they figured out everything almost 5 years after the fact......... Better late than never., right???... Thanks, I guess.
WePurrsevere
(24,259 posts)Were they blind, deaf and brain dead when they voted for him? I know most of his most avid followers get their need from the Faux News propaganda network but geesh.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)They didn't care.
Now they're just embarrassed that everyone knows they voted for a bigot.
ebbie15644
(1,214 posts)nose and they will vote for him. I wish they would just quit interviewing these "deplorables" and start interviewing the people that won't vote for him
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)was a big part of flipping the House in 2018.
ebbie15644
(1,214 posts)Trump showed people in 2016 who he was and these people voted for him anyway. I don't think they are going to "suddenly" decide to vote for the dem candidate. In 2018 what data shows they "flipped" their vote? or does the data show that voters that hadn't voted before or in the last election came out and voted?
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)however, it was so overwhelming, that people forgot about the scandals from the day before and from two days ago. Last week's scandals were ancient history.
So, when voters went to the polls, they were weighing Hillary and the recent revelation from the Comey letter versus 300 or so scandals from Trump. The media made Hillary's one scandal bigger than the 300 scandals from Trump because everybody had become numb to all the Trump scandals.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)Make Trump's Racism and Misogyny the center of any campaign against him.
Campaign 1 against David Duke was where they hit him on every issue - politics and scandals. Democrats won by 10 points.
Campaign 2 focused on Duke's racism and KKK associations. Dem turnout skyrocketed and Duke lost by 22 points.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)He says we have to stop bringing spreadsheets to a gunfight.
uponit7771
(90,304 posts)barbtries
(28,770 posts)but ew! the way he talks. yucky
republicans. it's beyond me.
ebbie15644
(1,214 posts)barbtries
(28,770 posts)who are these people.
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)Many of the suburban women, particularly college educated ones, who voted for Pennywise last time may not n 2020.
comradebillyboy
(10,128 posts)Three dozen interviews does not a scientific poll make.
CatMor
(6,212 posts)assaulting women, that he's a con and a crook. She didn't mind he is a bully and a liar. In her mind that was all OK because she thinks he brought a strong economy that.is actually Obama's. She doesn't seem to care much about morals. Doesn't seem too smart either.
MaryMagdaline
(6,851 posts)Day after 2020 election, theyll be telling me just how painful it was to vote Trump for yet a second time.
Coventina
(27,064 posts)Fuck her.
Wounded Bear
(58,604 posts)I agree with the consensus, this woman sounds a lot like Sue Collins. "I'm really concerned about that, but..."
GusBob
(7,286 posts)but unless they are lying about the "3 dozen interviews" there might be something there
It was what 53% of WW? doesn't take much to swing some votes or leave some at home
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Me being not impressed:
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Or are they the "Susan Collins" sub-group of concerned voters who claim to have issues, but support Trump anyway.