General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFederal lawsuit claims Texas' mail-in ballot procedures are unconstitutional
One of the plaintiffs was a national delegate to Philadelphia with me. She is a great lady.
Link to tweet
This time the legal challenge comes from the Texas Civil Rights Project on behalf of two Texas voters whose mail-in ballots were rejected after local officials determined the signatures on their ballots were not theirs.
In a federal lawsuit filed Wednesday in San Antonio, those two voters George Richardson of Brazos County and Rosalie Weisfeld of McAllen alleged that the state law that allows untrained local election officials to arbitrarily and subjectively reject mail-in ballots based on mismatching signatures violates the Fourteenth Amendment, the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Joined by groups that represent Texans with disabilities, veterans and young voters, they are asking a federal judge to either block election officials from rejecting mail-in ballots over signature doubts or require Texas to notify voters about an alleged mismatch in time for them to cure their ballot.
Gothmog
(145,063 posts)This is an important lawsuit in Texas https://www.lwv.org/newsroom/press-releases/lwv-texas-sues-fix-improper-rejection-mail-ballots?utm_source=PressRelease&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=RichardsonvTX
Every election, the League assists and educates thousands of voters on the rules around mail-in voting, said Grace Chimene, president of the League of Women Voters of Texas. When the rules are unclear, voters lose confidence in the election process. And when voters are also not given a chance to cure their ballots, they effectively lose their right to vote.
After plaintiff Dr. George Richardson voted by mail in the 2018 election, he received notice that his ballot was not counted due to a signature mismatch. Richardson was informed that the decision to reject his ballot was final, and he was never given an opportunity to provide additional proof that the signature on his ballot was in fact his. Richardsons experience highlights severe problems in the Texas state codes rules around mail-in voting.
Voting by mail is an essential avenue for many citizens to participate in our elections, said Chris Carson, president of the League of Women Voters of the United States. Voters who are elderly, disabled, or otherwise unable to vote in person must be allowed to participate with confidence that their votes will be counted.
pecosbob
(7,534 posts)and politics weren't held hostage by ratings.
DeminPennswoods
(15,273 posts)I know my own signature isn't as crisp and legible as it was when I was younger.
Gothmog
(145,063 posts)I have to sign 40 or so checks at a time. My signature on the first check does not match my signature on the last check
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,309 posts)Hope discovery produces a list of rejected ballots so they can be analyzed for patterns of rejection. Texas may have learned from Kobach rejecting names that don't sound American enough to suit the party in power.
Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)If that helps, lol
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,309 posts)Unless they do things differently there, "area[s]" don't make the election laws. I would like to know the stats state-wide.
Signature matching is another means of suppressing votes. Voter fraud is too rare to need such a solution. Election fraud is becoming rampant, hiding behind the cloak of GOPer cries of voter fraud.
Takket
(21,550 posts)in the election emp was allowed to rig for himself. lots of "mismatched signatures" thrown out by people who know nothing bout handwriting analysis. I'm sure the more "black your name sounded, the most mismatched your signature looked.
Gothmog
(145,063 posts)This issue was litigated in both Florida and Georgia last cycle. It is time to litigate it again in Texas
Gothmog
(145,063 posts)My county had 200+ ballots rejected in 2018 by a republican asshole and the local election administrator did not try to stop this. The pleading filed by the TCRP named both election administrators for the two ballots wrongfully rejected as named defendants. This will be fun to watch
Gothmog
(145,063 posts)Link to tweet
The suit says Texas is violating the Constitutions 14th Amendment, which guarantees equal protection under the law, by not implementing a uniform, statewide standard for verifying the signatures. It also contends that voters are being denied the 14th Amendments guarantee of due process because they do not have a chance to verify their signatures before a ballot is rejected.
The signature verification process violates the Americans with Disabilities Act and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act, the suit argues, because voters with disabilities may not be able to make previous signatures match.
Using a mail-in ballot in Texas is restricted. Only people who are at least 65 years old, or are out of their county during early voting periods and on Election Day, or have a disability, or are in jail but eligible to vote can use such ballots.
The plaintiffs want a federal judge to either block officials from rejecting a mail-in ballot because signatures are ruled not to match or to require the officials to give voters a chance to fix their ballots before the votes are rejected.