HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Ghislaine Maxwell Photos-...

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 09:45 PM

Ghislaine Maxwell Photos-Can you Spot the Difference?

Last edited Sun Aug 18, 2019, 12:30 PM - Edit history (1)

I could not reduce the size of the photos.

?quality=90&strip=all&w=1324

?quality=90&strip=all&w=1200

74 replies, 5885 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 74 replies Author Time Post
Reply Ghislaine Maxwell Photos-Can you Spot the Difference? (Original post)
Blueplanet Aug 2019 OP
elleng Aug 2019 #1
mr_lebowski Aug 2019 #2
42bambi Aug 2019 #3
MicaelS Aug 2019 #6
brooklynite Aug 2019 #9
Blueplanet Aug 2019 #4
whathehell Aug 2019 #52
Celerity Aug 2019 #5
Pachamama Aug 2019 #17
Qutzupalotl Aug 2019 #7
TexasProgresive Aug 2019 #12
MaryMagdaline Aug 2019 #22
treestar Aug 2019 #50
secondwind Aug 2019 #8
elleng Aug 2019 #13
Brother Buzz Aug 2019 #10
brooklynite Aug 2019 #11
elleng Aug 2019 #14
womanofthehills Aug 2019 #26
jberryhill Aug 2019 #32
womanofthehills Aug 2019 #62
cwydro Aug 2019 #66
Frustratedlady Aug 2019 #15
Sanity Claws Aug 2019 #16
Pachamama Aug 2019 #20
StarfishSaver Aug 2019 #25
jberryhill Aug 2019 #28
Newest Reality Aug 2019 #21
Blueplanet Aug 2019 #23
BigmanPigman Aug 2019 #18
womanofthehills Aug 2019 #30
BigmanPigman Aug 2019 #35
Blueplanet Aug 2019 #45
BigmanPigman Aug 2019 #49
LAS14 Aug 2019 #56
BigmanPigman Aug 2019 #61
leftyladyfrommo Aug 2019 #59
BigmanPigman Aug 2019 #60
LenaBaby61 Aug 2019 #19
StarfishSaver Aug 2019 #24
jberryhill Aug 2019 #38
Blueplanet Aug 2019 #44
Arazi Aug 2019 #48
jberryhill Aug 2019 #58
jberryhill Aug 2019 #27
blogslut Aug 2019 #29
klook Aug 2019 #31
Sugar Smack Aug 2019 #33
Takket Aug 2019 #34
MontanaMama Aug 2019 #36
jberryhill Aug 2019 #37
miyazaki Aug 2019 #41
jberryhill Aug 2019 #42
TygrBright Aug 2019 #39
Blueplanet Aug 2019 #47
enid602 Aug 2019 #40
jberryhill Aug 2019 #43
LAS14 Aug 2019 #46
Dyedinthewoolliberal Aug 2019 #51
Blueplanet Aug 2019 #53
LAS14 Aug 2019 #54
Blueplanet Aug 2019 #55
LAS14 Aug 2019 #63
Blueplanet Aug 2019 #68
underpants Aug 2019 #57
lame54 Aug 2019 #64
Sanity Claws Aug 2019 #65
Blueplanet Aug 2019 #69
gldstwmn Aug 2019 #73
gldstwmn Aug 2019 #67
Blueplanet Aug 2019 #70
Blueplanet Aug 2019 #71
Blueplanet Aug 2019 #72
discntnt_irny_srcsm Aug 2019 #74

Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 09:50 PM

1. Lost a few years, I'd say.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 09:50 PM

2. They're at different times, and someone made her look different ages in the photos? (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 09:59 PM

3. Top photo has a purse the bottom photo has a book. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 42bambi (Reply #3)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:03 PM

6. Look again.

Purse is now off to the right.

Blouse, rings and purse are the same. Taken within a short period of time and shopped.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 42bambi (Reply #3)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:04 PM

9. The purse is to the right in the second photo.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:00 PM

4. Hmm

She appears to be much older in the top one. Maybe it has been photoshopped.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Reply #4)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 01:01 PM

52. Agreed, but why do her the "favor" of making her look younger?

She seems an unworthy recipient of such kindness.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:02 PM

5. the NY Post claimed she was alone with her dog, yet there are 2 drinks, 2 fries with her

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Celerity (Reply #5)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:30 PM

17. Do you eat at In-n-out? Because one is the shake cup and the other is for water that they give you

I don’t see two fries - they wrap in paper their burgers...

Ghislaine orders like me......

A double double,fries, a Shake and a water - sometimes I Order off the secret menu some grilled onions and a Black & white


Also - one tray there - had there been order for two people they hand at counter on two trays

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:03 PM

7. She took off her glasses to read a book?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Qutzupalotl (Reply #7)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:07 PM

12. My wife can't do up close with her glasses on

She never needed reading glasses even before cataract surgery.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TexasProgresive (Reply #12)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:55 PM

22. Same here

Need glasses off to read

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Qutzupalotl (Reply #7)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 12:43 PM

50. I do

I need glasses for things farther away, like the Tv. Don't for things close.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:03 PM

8. Both pics have same woman in background

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to secondwind (Reply #8)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:08 PM

13. Right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:04 PM

10. A fast food joint's secret sauce has wrinkle remover in it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:06 PM

11. This is an embarrassing thread...

It's the same person at the same time in the same place. The first photo was taken probably when she was first seen. The second photo was posed and she took off her glasses and pulled out a book. The two drink cups are in both photos, the woman in the rear is the same in both photos, the person off screen on the left is holding the same burger.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #11)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:11 PM

14. NOT at the same time, or different woman;

hair, skin (aged in first) differ. Photo-shopped/made up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elleng (Reply #14)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 11:22 PM

26. If you are into taking selfies, you can look great in one photo and 10 yrs older in the next

The editors might have eliminated a wrinkle or two to make her look better for more sales. However, just turning your head a slight angle can make all the difference in how your wrinkles appear. The second photo is a little lighter with more contrast - something editors would want to do in Photoshop for publication.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to womanofthehills (Reply #26)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 11:27 PM

32. Fill-in flash on the second one

 


Since the first one is candid, the photographer would unlikely be using flash, if he thought she might bolt.

She's got the burger wrapper in her hands in the first one, clearly just took a bite and is maneuvering the food in her mouth to chew it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #32)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 08:35 PM

62. Photographers rarely use flash anymore - that was done in Photoshop

Even an i phone will take great pics in super low light and that is a daylight photo.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #11)

Tue Aug 20, 2019, 11:35 AM

66. No guy on the right in the first.

But he’s there in the second.

Lots of differences in the background.

I have no idea what this thread is about however.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:15 PM

15. In one, she's wearing glasses, which makes a huge difference.

The second is from a different angle. We all have a good angle and a bad one. The 2nd is her good angle.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:22 PM

16. Maxwell's head was photoshopped on the body.

The woman in the top photo looks to be in her 60s. Maxwell is a well-kept 50 something.
I don't believe that a woman raised in Europe and known to be wanted at least for questioning would hang out at a burger joint in Los Angeles.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sanity Claws (Reply #16)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:41 PM

20. I am a woman her age, raised in Europe and I eat at In-n-out

Their burgers are fantastic and the shakes are too...

Your assumptions are way off... I even know the secret non-published menu.

I look awful if caught off guard and a photo snapped - especially from side or taken from below. But I have pose where I tilt my gaze in one direction and smile just so and I look 10 years younger. Every 50ish plus woman knows that.

And especially when I just had a few Dysport injections in the forehead that relax it and fill worry lines...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pachamama (Reply #20)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 11:17 PM

25. She's doing one of my favorite poses in the second photo

Hand under chin - it takes years off.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pachamama (Reply #20)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 11:26 PM

28. Just took a bite and chewing, too

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sanity Claws (Reply #16)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:52 PM

21. I agree...

Not that it makes a big difference, but I have used Photoshop professionally for many years.

The body and scenes are the same, but the face has been placed and there are several factors that indicate that. It was a good job, too, but the lighting on the second face is a little out of context.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Newest Reality (Reply #21)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 11:04 PM

23. Yes.

This is what it appears to be.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:34 PM

18. There are many differences....

First of all in one she is EATING and READING A BOOK. Every person on the planet looks different when they are moving, especially all the facial muscles involved in the process of eating and chewing. She has glasses on too, which people do when they read and always alter a person's appearance. When she was photographed when she was still, and not eating and facing the camera she looks different since ALL people do! I drew live models for years and years in Art School and took tons of photos too and the whole idea that this particular photo is photoshopped based on "see any difference" is ridiculous.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BigmanPigman (Reply #18)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 11:27 PM

30. Agreed - I work in Photoshop almost ever day

I enlarged it in Photoshop and it looks real enough to me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to womanofthehills (Reply #30)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 11:43 PM

35. I just saw that there are several who are encouraging this theory...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BigmanPigman (Reply #35)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 08:10 AM

45. Interesting link

It mentions the book she was reading.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Reply #45)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 12:19 PM

49. Yesterday I read that Amazon was getting tons of orders for that book.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to womanofthehills (Reply #30)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 02:22 PM

56. What do you think of the photo in post 51? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LAS14 (Reply #56)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 07:57 PM

61. Someone obviously photoshopped the cat on the shirt. So what?

Next someone will photoshop Bill Clinton on it instead of Bob the Cat. Maybe she will also get a Hitler mustache and a pirate eye patch. The first two weren't photoshopped.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BigmanPigman (Reply #18)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 07:28 PM

59. Look behind her. The whole background is different.

That might be because it's taken from a different angle.

The white fence is gone in one. People are gone. Buildings are dufferent.
.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftyladyfrommo (Reply #59)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 07:54 PM

60. Everything is ifenticle, just taken from a slightly different angle...

Look closely. It is the same...I have a sharp eye and compared and contrasted them. Same exact setting and time of day, slightly different angle is all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 10:35 PM

19. IF this is that beastly, filthy, a moral woman ....

She'll probably also end up with the same fate as her beastly, filthy, a moral, pedophile, rapist boyfriend

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 11:16 PM

24. Two photos, one candid, the other posed, of the same woman taken in the same setting, close in time

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to StarfishSaver (Reply #24)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 12:40 AM

38. And also ignoring one of the other photos...

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #38)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 08:06 AM

44. Good Find

Did not see that one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #38)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 09:20 AM

48. In Mass she owned a Viszla. Now she has this dog?



Where is that dog and whose dog is this?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Arazi (Reply #48)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 06:33 PM

58. maybe it's a rental

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 11:25 PM

27. Looks like she's sucking food out of her teeth in the first one

 


And the second one uses fill-in flash.

Seems the first picture was an ambush, and she agreed to a second one.

One problem with still pictures is that by freezing moments, the context of an image of a moving subject is lost.

I guess we are supposed to think - from the question - that the first picture is of an older woman, and that the Post did some magic switheroo or something. But, really, why publish both photos if that was the case.

In the first pick, she's got what looks like it may be a burger wrapper in her hand (one of those In-N-Out hamburger sleeves), just took a bite and is chewing on it.

Nobody looks right when they've just taken a bite out of something and is chewing.

In the second one, it looks like she posed with the book out, and the photographer used fill-in flash.

Some time has lapsed, since the diners at the table in the back right have left and been replaced. The woman at back left is still there.

As far as the beverages go, the two cups are different colors. Is that a coffee and a water, as is common in Europe?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 11:26 PM

29. I can tell from the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 11:27 PM

31. The first one is Epstein in drag!!1!1

Obviously!!1!1!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 11:28 PM

33. She appears to be wiping her hands, and swallowing at a 3/4 view, which is

not a good look for anyone. In the 2nd one, she's doing a typical pose of a woman who's prepared for her picture to be taken. She's prepared herself my removing her glasses, a straight ahead look, and a subtle face-lift pull with the hand she's "resting" on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 11:31 PM

34. The biggest problem I see...

Is that in none of these pictures she’s handcuffed and in the back of a police car

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Takket (Reply #34)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 11:47 PM

36. Thread winner.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 12:28 AM

37. A more interesting question is which In-N-Out

 


I'm doing streetview of the ones in LA and haven't found it yet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #37)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 01:34 AM

41. The one closest to Universal Studios

Just had me a "Double Double" yesterday. So the thread caught my attention. And of course, much better than Chik-Fil-A.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to miyazaki (Reply #41)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 02:01 AM

42. Sure enough - right off the 101 on Cahuenga

 


https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1348936,-118.3608803,3a,70.9y,238.53h,83.53t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sd9S9NUqYc1spoaM0IWK_jA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 01:04 AM

39. oooh! ooohh! I LOVE these kinds of puzzles!! Okay, here goes:

Top photo is #1, bottom is #2

#1 has way less traffic. Angle of sun on the building with the two green awnings is quite different. Camera is about 18" further back from subject in foreground and angled slightly down as though photographer was standing.

#2 has more traffic in background, brighter reflection off windows under the green awnings. The guy in the purplish-blue t-shirt has joined the party at the table to the right behind foreground subject. Foreground subject has taken off glasses, placed an open book atop the phone, moved purse to the right of meal tray. Camera is closer and angled straight-on as though photographer has stooped a little.

What do I win?

interestedly,
Bright

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TygrBright (Reply #39)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 09:19 AM

47. Sorry - No Prizes!


Puzzles are great.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 01:27 AM

40. second photo

The second photo was taken after she'd eaten a couple of young girls.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to enid602 (Reply #40)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 02:39 AM

43. oooooooh

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 09:12 AM

46. This is a really interesting thread. Thanks to the knowledgeable DUers for sharing. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 12:51 PM

51. Did you see this??


Wonder where Bill the Cat came from, or went?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dyedinthewoolliberal (Reply #51)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 01:28 PM

53. Oh My! Very good.



At first, I could not figure out the cartoon character on her shirt. Then I noticed your comment at the bottom; it's Bill the Cat.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dyedinthewoolliberal (Reply #51)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 01:37 PM

54. So this is proof of some photo shopping. Right? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LAS14 (Reply #54)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 01:41 PM

55. Yes - I believe it is

Dyedinthewoolliberal is trying to pull a fast one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Reply #55)

Mon Aug 19, 2019, 04:04 PM

63. Do you think the day is coming when experts won't be able...

... to tell if something has been Photo-shopped? Or the equivalent? (Is that term like kleenex and xerox - now generic?)

tia
las

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LAS14 (Reply #63)

Tue Aug 20, 2019, 02:31 PM

68. That day is probably already here

LAS14

It's very difficult to determine if something has been photo-shopped. Even professionals can be put to the task when trying to determine if something is fake or not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Sun Aug 18, 2019, 02:29 PM

57. I used to be great at these on the back of Highlights Magazine

I said HighLIGHTS not High Times ya damned hippies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Mon Aug 19, 2019, 04:24 PM

64. Did that guy move across the table to get into the pic?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Tue Aug 20, 2019, 10:26 AM

65. photoshopped

https://jezebel.com/it-seems-like-those-images-of-ghislaine-maxwell-at-in-n-1837390277

Apparently done to throw people off the trail of where Maxwell really is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sanity Claws (Reply #65)

Tue Aug 20, 2019, 02:44 PM

69. Wow!

Thanks for the link Sanity Claws.

Part of a paragraph from the article:

"But the Daily Mail, renowned investigative shop that it is, took a very intensive look at the photo and arrived an interesting conclusion: It was staged by Maxwell’s attorney, Leah Saffian."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Reply #69)

Wed Aug 21, 2019, 05:06 PM

73. The Daily Mail says she's still in Massachusetts.

Their skills rival that of the National Enquirer who, say what you will, could find just about anyone anywhere on this planet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Tue Aug 20, 2019, 01:40 PM

67. According to Jezebel, Good Boys

never had an ad at that bus stop. Also the dog belongs to a friend/attorney. Supposedly it has it's own Instagram page. For some reason I'm reminded of those Lee Harvey Oswald photos.
Wherever she is, she's pretty well hidden it seems.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gldstwmn (Reply #67)

Tue Aug 20, 2019, 02:51 PM

70. The Dog

gldstwmn

I would like to see a picture of the dog on instagram. I'll see if I can find it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gldstwmn (Reply #67)

Tue Aug 20, 2019, 03:06 PM

71. Picture of the Dog

Instagram picture of the dog:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Tue Aug 20, 2019, 04:09 PM

72. Inside Edition Video re: Photo

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blueplanet (Original post)

Wed Aug 21, 2019, 05:32 PM

74. California is the only place I've seen blue street signs

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread