Ghislaine Maxwell Photos-Can you Spot the Difference?

[Blueplanet]

Last edited Sun Aug 18, 2019, 12:30 PM - Edit history (1)

I could not reduce the size of the photos.

?quality=90&strip=all&w=1324

?quality=90&strip=all&w=1200

[elleng]

1. Lost a few years, I'd say.

[mr_lebowski]

2. They're at different times, and someone made her look different ages in the photos? (nt)

[42bambi]

3. Top photo has a purse the bottom photo has a book. nt

[MicaelS]

6. Look again.

Purse is now off to the right.

Blouse, rings and purse are the same. Taken within a short period of time and shopped.

[brooklynite]

9. The purse is to the right in the second photo.

[Blueplanet]

4. Hmm

She appears to be much older in the top one. Maybe it has been photoshopped.

[whathehell]

52. Agreed, but why do her the "favor" of making her look younger?

She seems an unworthy recipient of such kindness.

[Celerity]

5. the NY Post claimed she was alone with her dog, yet there are 2 drinks, 2 fries with her

[Pachamama]

17. Do you eat at In-n-out? Because one is the shake cup and the other is for water that they give you

I don’t see two fries - they wrap in paper their burgers...

Ghislaine orders like me......

A double double,fries, a Shake and a water - sometimes I Order off the secret menu some grilled onions and a Black & white


Also - one tray there - had there been order for two people they hand at counter on two trays

[Qutzupalotl]

7. She took off her glasses to read a book?

[TexasProgresive]

12. My wife can't do up close with her glasses on

She never needed reading glasses even before cataract surgery.

[MaryMagdaline]

22. Same here

Need glasses off to read

[treestar]

50. I do

I need glasses for things farther away, like the Tv. Don't for things close.

[secondwind]

8. Both pics have same woman in background

[elleng]

13. Right.

[Brother Buzz]

10. A fast food joint's secret sauce has wrinkle remover in it?

[brooklynite]

11. This is an embarrassing thread...

It's the same person at the same time in the same place. The first photo was taken probably when she was first seen. The second photo was posed and she took off her glasses and pulled out a book. The two drink cups are in both photos, the woman in the rear is the same in both photos, the person off screen on the left is holding the same burger.

[elleng]

14. NOT at the same time, or different woman;

hair, skin (aged in first) differ. Photo-shopped/made up.

[womanofthehills]

26. If you are into taking selfies, you can look great in one photo and 10 yrs older in the next

The editors might have eliminated a wrinkle or two to make her look better for more sales. However, just turning your head a slight angle can make all the difference in how your wrinkles appear. The second photo is a little lighter with more contrast - something editors would want to do in Photoshop for publication.

[jberryhill]

32. Fill-in flash on the second one

Since the first one is candid, the photographer would unlikely be using flash, if he thought she might bolt.

She's got the burger wrapper in her hands in the first one, clearly just took a bite and is maneuvering the food in her mouth to chew it.

[womanofthehills]

62. Photographers rarely use flash anymore - that was done in Photoshop

Even an i phone will take great pics in super low light and that is a daylight photo.

[cwydro]

66. No guy on the right in the first.

But he’s there in the second.

Lots of differences in the background.

I have no idea what this thread is about however.

[Frustratedlady]

15. In one, she's wearing glasses, which makes a huge difference.

The second is from a different angle. We all have a good angle and a bad one. The 2nd is her good angle.

[Sanity Claws]

16. Maxwell's head was photoshopped on the body.

The woman in the top photo looks to be in her 60s. Maxwell is a well-kept 50 something.
I don't believe that a woman raised in Europe and known to be wanted at least for questioning would hang out at a burger joint in Los Angeles.

[Pachamama]

20. I am a woman her age, raised in Europe and I eat at In-n-out

Their burgers are fantastic and the shakes are too...

Your assumptions are way off... I even know the secret non-published menu.

I look awful if caught off guard and a photo snapped - especially from side or taken from below. But I have pose where I tilt my gaze in one direction and smile just so and I look 10 years younger. Every 50ish plus woman knows that.

And especially when I just had a few Dysport injections in the forehead that relax it and fill worry lines...

[StarfishSaver]

25. She's doing one of my favorite poses in the second photo

Hand under chin - it takes years off.

[jberryhill]

28. Just took a bite and chewing, too

[Newest Reality]

21. I agree...

Not that it makes a big difference, but I have used Photoshop professionally for many years.

The body and scenes are the same, but the face has been placed and there are several factors that indicate that. It was a good job, too, but the lighting on the second face is a little out of context.

[Blueplanet]

23. Yes.

This is what it appears to be.

[BigmanPigman]

18. There are many differences....

First of all in one she is EATING and READING A BOOK. Every person on the planet looks different when they are moving, especially all the facial muscles involved in the process of eating and chewing. She has glasses on too, which people do when they read and always alter a person's appearance. When she was photographed when she was still, and not eating and facing the camera she looks different since ALL people do! I drew live models for years and years in Art School and took tons of photos too and the whole idea that this particular photo is photoshopped based on "see any difference" is ridiculous.

[womanofthehills]

30. Agreed - I work in Photoshop almost ever day

I enlarged it in Photoshop and it looks real enough to me.

[BigmanPigman]

35. I just saw that there are several who are encouraging this theory...

https://frankreport.com/2019/08/17/the-bullshit-photos-of-ghislaine-maxwell-in-ny-post-further-examined/

I saw the same thing from the Daily Mail earlier too.

[Blueplanet]

45. Interesting link

It mentions the book she was reading.

[BigmanPigman]

49. Yesterday I read that Amazon was getting tons of orders for that book.

[LAS14]

56. What do you think of the photo in post 51? nt

[BigmanPigman]

61. Someone obviously photoshopped the cat on the shirt. So what?

Next someone will photoshop Bill Clinton on it instead of Bob the Cat. Maybe she will also get a Hitler mustache and a pirate eye patch. The first two weren't photoshopped.

[leftyladyfrommo]

59. Look behind her. The whole background is different.

That might be because it's taken from a different angle.

The white fence is gone in one. People are gone. Buildings are dufferent.
.

[BigmanPigman]

60. Everything is ifenticle, just taken from a slightly different angle...

Look closely. It is the same...I have a sharp eye and compared and contrasted them. Same exact setting and time of day, slightly different angle is all.

[LenaBaby61]

19. IF this is that beastly, filthy, a moral woman ....

She'll probably also end up with the same fate as her beastly, filthy, a moral, pedophile, rapist boyfriend

[StarfishSaver]

24. Two photos, one candid, the other posed, of the same woman taken in the same setting, close in time

[jberryhill]

38. And also ignoring one of the other photos...

[Blueplanet]

44. Good Find

Did not see that one.

[Arazi]

48. In Mass she owned a Viszla. Now she has this dog?

Where is that dog and whose dog is this?

[jberryhill]

58. maybe it's a rental

[jberryhill]

27. Looks like she's sucking food out of her teeth in the first one

And the second one uses fill-in flash.

Seems the first picture was an ambush, and she agreed to a second one.

One problem with still pictures is that by freezing moments, the context of an image of a moving subject is lost.

I guess we are supposed to think - from the question - that the first picture is of an older woman, and that the Post did some magic switheroo or something. But, really, why publish both photos if that was the case.

In the first pick, she's got what looks like it may be a burger wrapper in her hand (one of those In-N-Out hamburger sleeves), just took a bite and is chewing on it.

Nobody looks right when they've just taken a bite out of something and is chewing.

In the second one, it looks like she posed with the book out, and the photographer used fill-in flash.

Some time has lapsed, since the diners at the table in the back right have left and been replaced. The woman at back left is still there.

As far as the beverages go, the two cups are different colors. Is that a coffee and a water, as is common in Europe?

[blogslut]

29. I can tell from the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time...

[klook]

31. The first one is Epstein in drag!!1!1

Obviously!!1!1!

[Sugar Smack]

33. She appears to be wiping her hands, and swallowing at a 3/4 view, which is

not a good look for anyone. In the 2nd one, she's doing a typical pose of a woman who's prepared for her picture to be taken. She's prepared herself my removing her glasses, a straight ahead look, and a subtle face-lift pull with the hand she's "resting" on.

[Takket]

34. The biggest problem I see...

Is that in none of these pictures she’s handcuffed and in the back of a police car

[MontanaMama]

36. Thread winner.

[jberryhill]

37. A more interesting question is which In-N-Out

I'm doing streetview of the ones in LA and haven't found it yet.

[miyazaki]

41. The one closest to Universal Studios

Just had me a "Double Double" yesterday. So the thread caught my attention. And of course, much better than Chik-Fil-A.

[jberryhill]

42. Sure enough - right off the 101 on Cahuenga

https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1348936,-118.3608803,3a,70.9y,238.53h,83.53t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sd9S9NUqYc1spoaM0IWK_jA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

[TygrBright]

39. oooh! ooohh! I LOVE these kinds of puzzles!! Okay, here goes:

Top photo is #1, bottom is #2

#1 has way less traffic. Angle of sun on the building with the two green awnings is quite different. Camera is about 18" further back from subject in foreground and angled slightly down as though photographer was standing.

#2 has more traffic in background, brighter reflection off windows under the green awnings. The guy in the purplish-blue t-shirt has joined the party at the table to the right behind foreground subject. Foreground subject has taken off glasses, placed an open book atop the phone, moved purse to the right of meal tray. Camera is closer and angled straight-on as though photographer has stooped a little.

What do I win?

interestedly,
Bright

[Blueplanet]

47. Sorry - No Prizes!

Puzzles are great.

[enid602]

40. second photo

The second photo was taken after she'd eaten a couple of young girls.

[jberryhill]

43. oooooooh

[LAS14]

46. This is a really interesting thread. Thanks to the knowledgeable DUers for sharing. nt

[Dyedinthewoolliberal]

51. Did you see this??

Wonder where Bill the Cat came from, or went?

[Blueplanet]

53. Oh My! Very good.

At first, I could not figure out the cartoon character on her shirt. Then I noticed your comment at the bottom; it's Bill the Cat.

[LAS14]

54. So this is proof of some photo shopping. Right? nt

[Blueplanet]

55. Yes - I believe it is

Dyedinthewoolliberal is trying to pull a fast one.

[LAS14]

63. Do you think the day is coming when experts won't be able...

... to tell if something has been Photo-shopped? Or the equivalent? (Is that term like kleenex and xerox - now generic?)

tia
las

[Blueplanet]

68. That day is probably already here

LAS14

It's very difficult to determine if something has been photo-shopped. Even professionals can be put to the task when trying to determine if something is fake or not.

[underpants]

57. I used to be great at these on the back of Highlights Magazine

I said HighLIGHTS not High Times ya damned hippies.

[lame54]

64. Did that guy move across the table to get into the pic?

[Sanity Claws]

65. photoshopped

https://jezebel.com/it-seems-like-those-images-of-ghislaine-maxwell-at-in-n-1837390277

Apparently done to throw people off the trail of where Maxwell really is.

[Blueplanet]

69. Wow!

Thanks for the link Sanity Claws.

Part of a paragraph from the article:

"But the Daily Mail, renowned investigative shop that it is, took a very intensive look at the photo and arrived an interesting conclusion: It was staged by Maxwell’s attorney, Leah Saffian."

[gldstwmn]

73. The Daily Mail says she's still in Massachusetts.

Their skills rival that of the National Enquirer who, say what you will, could find just about anyone anywhere on this planet.

[gldstwmn]

67. According to Jezebel, Good Boys

never had an ad at that bus stop. Also the dog belongs to a friend/attorney. Supposedly it has it's own Instagram page. For some reason I'm reminded of those Lee Harvey Oswald photos.
Wherever she is, she's pretty well hidden it seems.

[Blueplanet]

70. The Dog

gldstwmn

I would like to see a picture of the dog on instagram. I'll see if I can find it.

[Blueplanet]

71. Picture of the Dog

Instagram picture of the dog:

[Blueplanet]

72. Inside Edition Video re: Photo

[discntnt_irny_srcsm]

74. California is the only place I've seen blue street signs