Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
**He Spent Years Infiltrating White Supremacist Groups. Here's What He Has to Say About What's Going (Original Post) SummerSnow Sep 2019 OP
MUST READ malaise Sep 2019 #1
nice post pecosbob Sep 2019 #3
As we say malaise Sep 2019 #8
White supremacist won't prosecute white supremacist, or make polies to stop their crimes SummerSnow Sep 2019 #5
That is the absolute truth malaise Sep 2019 #6
+1000! Kind of Blue Sep 2019 #9
Who is that woman in your sig line? She keeps charming the pants off of me! Lucky Luciano Sep 2019 #28
josephine baker CatWoman Sep 2019 #30
Yeah, Ms. Baker, so charming an Italian count and an Hungarian calvary Kind of Blue Sep 2019 #32
She is amazing - thanks! Lucky Luciano Sep 2019 #36
Too Funny, I asked you about your handle once upon a time Kind of Blue Sep 2019 #39
Kick dalton99a Sep 2019 #2
I agree with him on much, but would love to see Frank Figliuzzi debate him on need for hlthe2b Sep 2019 #4
I would love to see them debate that too. Hopefully he'll get inited to Rachel Maddow SummerSnow Sep 2019 #7
Agree. Interestingly, he says there are fewer homicides and Hortensis Sep 2019 #19
Yup, no need for new laws or huge intrusive data mining Amishman Sep 2019 #33
You only posted a link. Where is some information from the article? mysteryowl Sep 2019 #10
you can type in 'Michael German fbi' then go to news there are several articles about this from SummerSnow Sep 2019 #12
I am used to DU posts providing information in regards to the point of their post. mysteryowl Sep 2019 #15
Whatever floats your boat SummerSnow Sep 2019 #16
Oh well ChubbyStar Sep 2019 #22
Here's a 4 paragraph excerpt with a link to article: CottonBear Sep 2019 #23
This is kind of you. mysteryowl Sep 2019 #26
You are welcome! CottonBear Sep 2019 #27
I don't want to paint the FBI as the bad guys FakeNoose Sep 2019 #11
Well look who is running the Justice Department and the former both are racist. SummerSnow Sep 2019 #13
Public pressure eventually works..sometimes mountain grammy Sep 2019 #14
I didn't read the article but I know that domestic anti terror programs have been defanged UniteFightBack Sep 2019 #17
Does anyone actually believe that when the Patriot Act was passed pecosbob Sep 2019 #18
one major problem is we've got 1500 radio stations making excuses for racism and racists and certainot Sep 2019 #20
Thanks for this post. BlueMTexpat Sep 2019 #21
Bookmarked. calimary Sep 2019 #24
I'm always asking where's Wray and the FBI? Mc Mike Sep 2019 #25
My 2 cents worth all along, My T shirts seen often on BART lambchopp59 Sep 2019 #29
What is BART ? Alwaysna Sep 2019 #37
Bay Area Rapid Transit lambchopp59 Sep 2019 #38
Bookmarked..... Heartstrings Sep 2019 #31
Excellent article. Nitram Sep 2019 #34
a lot of clean-out and disinfecting needed at all levels of govt Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2019 #35

malaise

(294,649 posts)
1. MUST READ
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 08:20 AM
Sep 2019

Get thee to the greatest page


and this

The Justice Department and FBI de-prioritize the investigation and prosecution of far-right violence as a matter of policy, not a lack of authority. These recent cases are a result of increased public pressure to do something about these crimes. But the Justice Department and FBI have done nothing to amend their policies that de-prioritize the investigation of white supremacist crimes. Maintaining public pressure and focusing on changing the biases that drive these policies is essential to forcing a change in priorities at these agencies.

pecosbob

(8,353 posts)
3. nice post
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 08:22 AM
Sep 2019

The fact that a few lonely voices from LE are calling for new domestic terrorism laws yet the response from Justice is crickets...

SummerSnow

(12,608 posts)
5. White supremacist won't prosecute white supremacist, or make polies to stop their crimes
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 08:23 AM
Sep 2019

Kind of Blue

(8,709 posts)
32. Yeah, Ms. Baker, so charming an Italian count and an Hungarian calvary
Tue Sep 3, 2019, 06:19 AM
Sep 2019

captain fought a duel over her with swords! until she stopped them from killing each other when the captain injured the count.

Anyway, she and Lucky Luciano may have known each other. Luciano once said, "When I was Charlie Lucky Luciano I dated some black celebrities and the mob called me a corleone." I don't know the meaning of corleone but the rumor is he dated Baker and Dorothy Dandridge.

Her life was amazing, besides being a celebrated singer/actress/dancer/French Resistance spy during WWII/Civil Rights activists making her the Colin Kaeparnickof her times, she was the only female speaker during the March on Washington, speaking just before Dr. King. After King's assassination, Coretta Scott King asked Baker to become the leader of the movement. She declined stating that she had too many young children (12 adopted) to care for.

She said in the speech, "I am not a young woman now, friends. My life is behind me. There is not too much fire burning inside me. And before it goes out, I want you to use what is left to light that fire in you. So that you can carry on, and so that you can do those things that I have done. Then, when my fires have burned out, and I go where we all go someday, I can be happy."



Lucky Luciano

(11,850 posts)
36. She is amazing - thanks!
Tue Sep 3, 2019, 01:12 PM
Sep 2019

Funny that I chose the Lucky Luciano handle too (there is a story to that with me trolling the freepers and getting banned with various mafia names until I discovered DU and signed up with the last name used at that shithole).

Kind of Blue

(8,709 posts)
39. Too Funny, I asked you about your handle once upon a time
Wed Sep 4, 2019, 08:23 AM
Sep 2019

I think it was in the AA group, and your shenanigans had me rolling. What a trooper!

hlthe2b

(113,378 posts)
4. I agree with him on much, but would love to see Frank Figliuzzi debate him on need for
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 08:22 AM
Sep 2019

specific DOMESTIC TERRORISM laws. German states: "Congress shouldn’t pass broad new laws or stiffer penalties, as there are already dozens of federal statutes outlawing domestic terrorism, hate crimes and organized violent crime that carry significant sentences."

I KNOW Frank (and others) would disagree on this and I'd love to see it debated.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
19. Agree. Interestingly, he says there are fewer homicides and
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 09:24 AM
Sep 2019

that the internet while used by hate groups has benefited law enforcement more than violent groups.

They use the internet more to communicate today than 20 years ago, ... but that doesn’t mean there is more violence. In fact, as the recent cases suggest, internet communications make them far easier to track and infiltrate, so it is more a boost to law enforcement more than to violent militants.

But mass monitoring of social media for clues isn’t an effective strategy, as there are far more people expressing racist ideas online than committing violence. The FBI would be very busy chasing down false leads, which would only dull the response. Instead, the FBI and other law enforcement agencies should ... The number of homicides in the U.S. has fallen significantly since the 1980s and 1990s, but so has the clearance rate. Even though there are fewer homicides now, fewer are being solved. I think it is because we are spending so much time and resources on suspicion-less surveillance and intelligence gathering rather than traditional evidence-based law enforcement tactics.

I'm guessing there would be plenty of both overlap and disagreement. From what I've been reading, most of these groups intend revolutionary overthrow of the liberal democracy they hate because it creates and maintains equality. In that, they're pulling the same direction as our other big enemies foreign and domestic -- those in the Republican Party, the religious right, and the wealthy right who can't win in a democratic system; also Russia, China, Iran, and other hostile nations who want to destroy us. All with the goal of actively attacking and undermining our democracy until it falls.

If true, it's hard to imagine we should cut back on surveillance and intelligence gathering. And sure, put as much effort as needed into identifying and stopping those who reach the evidence-producing (active planning and execution) stages also.

Amishman

(5,920 posts)
33. Yup, no need for new laws or huge intrusive data mining
Tue Sep 3, 2019, 06:42 AM
Sep 2019

When human intelligence and infiltration is far more effective and doesn't impact the larger public. The point made in the article that the online presence of these groups aiding law enforcement makes so much sense.

Prioritize infiltrating these groups and fund human intelligence.

SummerSnow

(12,608 posts)
12. you can type in 'Michael German fbi' then go to news there are several articles about this from
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 08:46 AM
Sep 2019

various news sources

mysteryowl

(8,981 posts)
15. I am used to DU posts providing information in regards to the point of their post.
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 08:54 AM
Sep 2019

I don't tend to research topics without knowing why.

CottonBear

(21,615 posts)
23. Here's a 4 paragraph excerpt with a link to article:
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 09:41 AM
Sep 2019



https://www.propublica.org/article/he-spent-years-infiltrating-white-supremacist-groups-heres-what-he-has-to-say-about-whats-going-on-now

...snip...

We went back to German, a fellow with the Brennan Center for Justice’s Liberty and National Security Program and the author of the forthcoming book “Disrupt, Discredit, and Divide: How the New FBI Damages Democracy,” to inquire about the significance of the seeming burst of enforcement efforts.

...snip...

First, the arrests of several white nationalists allegedly planning acts of violence since the El Paso attack demonstrate beyond question that the FBI has all the authority it needs to act proactively against white supremacist violence. Claims from the FBI Agents Association and other current and former Justice Department officials that the government needs new laws to target this violence are false. I worked successful domestic terrorism undercover operations against white supremacists in the 1990s, and no one ever suggested we didn’t have all the authority we needed.

It is hard to know if these arrests mark a new increase in attention to far-right violence because the Justice Department doesn’t keep reliable data about how many investigations and prosecutions it conducts against white supremacists. It sometimes categorizes them as domestic terrorism, other times as hate crimes or even gang crimes, obscuring the true scope of the violence they inflict on our society. And since the Justice Department defers the investigation and prosecution of hate crimes to state and local law enforcement, the FBI doesn’t even know how many people white supremacists kill each year.

The Justice Department and FBI de-prioritize the investigation and prosecution of far-right violence as a matter of policy, not a lack of authority. These recent cases are a result of increased public pressure to do something about these crimes. But the Justice Department and FBI have done nothing to amend their policies that de-prioritize the investigation of white supremacist crimes. Maintaining public pressure and focusing on changing the biases that drive these policies is essential to forcing a change in priorities at these agencies.

...snip...



CottonBear

(21,615 posts)
27. You are welcome!
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 04:08 PM
Sep 2019

It’s good DU posting etiquette to post the allowed, maximum four paragraph article excerpt and link.

BTW, I really like your DU name! I like owls! 🦉

FakeNoose

(40,985 posts)
11. I don't want to paint the FBI as the bad guys
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 08:42 AM
Sep 2019

I really don't! But it seems to me that they spend too much time investigating illegal activities and not enough time protecting the US citizens. The only purpose of an undercover operation should be to get enough on the criminals to obtain a warrant and arrest them. Stop to the crimes, that's the FBI's REAL job.

I plan to read Mike German's book "Disrupt, Discredit, and Divide: How the New FBI Damages Democracy"
https://thenewpress.com/books/disrupt-discredit-divide

SummerSnow

(12,608 posts)
13. Well look who is running the Justice Department and the former both are racist.
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 08:50 AM
Sep 2019

Part of Trump's base is these white supremacists so he would never go after them. Some of them might get arrested but as long as the republicans have the senate majority no bill will be passed to disrupt their activities. I feel one of the reasons why gun laws won't change is that these white supremacists cannot undergo a background check. If they do the majority of them won't get guns legally since most of them especially the violent ones are felons. I also believe that the 'stand your ground ' law is very racially motivated as well. They are making it very easy for these white supremacists to carry out their violence.

 

UniteFightBack

(8,231 posts)
17. I didn't read the article but I know that domestic anti terror programs have been defanged
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 09:14 AM
Sep 2019

and under funded.

pecosbob

(8,353 posts)
18. Does anyone actually believe that when the Patriot Act was passed
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 09:15 AM
Sep 2019

the FBI was looking for Islamic Terrorists when cataloguing borrowers' reading history at your local library? We obviously know they weren't looking for white domestic terrorists...who does that leave? Leftists...activists...malcontents.

I personally believe this has in fact been the FBI's primary task since it was formed...chasing reds...and they see red everywhere.

 

certainot

(9,090 posts)
20. one major problem is we've got 1500 radio stations making excuses for racism and racists and
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 09:28 AM
Sep 2019

repeating there is no white privilege, muslims are terrorists, illegal immigrants are voting for dems so we need voter suppression, and why do we need affirmative action, etc., all day long.

liberals and anti-racists can complain all day and it will never be louder or more coordinated than a few hundred assholes on 1500 coordinated radio stations. that's the buzzz the white nationalists and their parents have been getting for 30 years.

if anti-racists want to protest white nationalism, racism, and trump they need to put the rw radio monopoly propaganda operation that putin has been feeding, out of business, with boycotts and protests at radio stations when they get racist - which is every day - and protests at the 88+ universities that support 260 limbaugh/putin/trump radio stations.

Mc Mike

(9,258 posts)
25. I'm always asking where's Wray and the FBI?
Mon Sep 2, 2019, 11:33 AM
Sep 2019

I saw in the article that the Feds claimed 90 cases where they arrested radical right terrorists, but refused to document even one to pro publica. Rec, thanks.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»**He Spent Years Infiltra...