I've been here on DU since 2011 officially, but I lurked for a few years before that. I'm a radical.

[Magoo48]

My politics have always been way left with an emphasis on radical environmentalism. I’ve found that DU is where I must participate politically, because my folks don’t have a real party, and our champions, for the most part, don’t show well in elections. Therefore, I vote with and for Democrats. I take my direct action in the marine litter removal area on a regular basis and participate regularly online in environmental communities.

That said, I’m curious, are there any other self identified radicals here who find themselves in the same boat? Of course, I understand if you don’t want to identify on an open forum. I’m 71 now and no longer care much who knows what about me. Anywho, thanks for listening.

[HAB911]

1. +++++++++++

70 next month and I am all out of fucks to give!

This OP will probably be torn to shreds.

I'm with you

[Pacifist Patriot]

2. I sure hope you're wrong.

Just like you, I see nothing worth shredding.

[HAB911]

4. I too am insanely radical

and for the most part refrain from posting on DU what I can and do routinely post on FB. The pearl clutchers and vapor havers are just not worth it. But that's just me.

[lagomorph777]

93. What most of today's Dems call "the far left" is far to the right of me.

I'm just a little younger than you guys.

[brutus smith]

3. I'm with ya too.

My wife joined in the early 2000's. I read a lot of posts before I joined because I'm tired of the "go along get along" crowd.

[in2herbs]

5. Count me as a member of this club, a proud member. My radicalism is concealed behind

my DU name, but I would venture to say that I've sacrificed more in the fight for what's right than most others, even here on DU, which is why I don't cater to thinking we have to make nice with some Rs. Welcome.

[Scruffy1]

6. Like you I am very left.

I've always voted for a Democrat, but I have a lot of people I know on the left don't. My view is that third parties are doomed under the rules we have as a country on voting and representation. I'm also old and have seen a little glimmer of hope latelyof the Democrats waking up.

[mysteryowl]

7. Wow, how is it "radical" to care for and about our environment?

You are not radical in my eyes. You are sitting in the right place of caring and taking action.

We need 'radical' from everyone. Is Greta Thurnberg radical? No, she is spot on.

[Magoo48]

9. Yes, Greta is a force of nature, a wonder, an orator of rare clarity. She is not at all radical

But common sense in its purest form.

[DemocracyMouse]

11. When common sense becomes "radical" then we've become, well, idiots.

Call me a radical centrist! Stuff we label "radical" can be identified as sensible and wise in countries where entertainment hasn't't usurped the citizens' brains.

I tell my 19 yr old who has come of age surrounded by a number of Trump-loving teenagers: "It's not about Left vs Right, it's about rational vs irrational."

[Bettie]

59. My son recently told me he's a moderate

then he told me what he thinks are moderate positions.

Here on DU, he'd be labeled a radical or ultra-liberal far lefty...just like his mother.

[Magoo48]

85. So often the language of labels gets hung up in our definitions.

[KY_EnviroGuy]

8. It's time for the left's radicals, moderates and even those in the middle to...

be united in one singular purpose - to defeat the Republican Party in all sectors of government.

I'm 71 as well and have watched as this administration reversed the effects of some of my hard work in the environmental field for many, many years. But I'm still very proud of that work, as it saved many lives. So, I hang on to that legacy with joy but all the while being depressed over Rethug back-stepping with environmental policy.

We will again eventually right this drifting ship.........

Congratulations on your years of helping to right the wrongs of humans that pollute our fragile planet....

[Magoo48]

15. I will vote for whomever we stand up there,

but like all of us, I have my druthers.

[Martin Eden]

10. Passion for saving our planet's environment, ecosystems, and

Diversity of life should be among the highest priorities and values of an enlightened civilization.

The fact it is considered "radical" at the highest reaches of our government shows how much we have to overcome in saving this planetary lifeboat for future generations.

Politics is the art of the possible. We have to hold onto our highest values and long term goals while understanding the line between progress and overreach.

The term "radical environmentalist" was created to marginalize anyone who is a threat to the wealth and power derived from ravaging and polluting this Earth. Pushing too far beyond what the public is willing to accept can damage the movement.

The malefactors of great wealth have a megaphone for shaping public opinion while we have often struggled to be more than a voice in the wilderness. Progress has been made in the last half century and our current Democratic leaders have a strong message with some real policies for battling climate change.

We have to win elections, then hold them to fulfilling their message by implementing policies which make a difference.

Ultimately, real progress has to be made in the hearts and minds of our fellow citizens in a culture dominated by commercialism and hedonistic consumption.

Dedicated people like yourself are essential for grass roots progress while enlightened leadership is needed on the national level.

Time is running out. We have to win in 2020, then move forward from there.

[DemocracyMouse]

13. In these times the art of well-informed passion trumps the art of the possible

Democrats have sat back and let the Republicans do their politics with passion and LOST. Being tepid is a formula for FAILURE.

[Martin Eden]

17. I agree wholeheartedly

Being tepid will get us nowhere!

[Magoo48]

22. Demure and reluctant is not an inspiring look for Dems at this juncture.

[KPN]

25. Well said!

[Magoo48]

19. In reference to your tag line:

I believe the purer the democracy we practice, the faster we can impress the hearts and minds of those not yet informed of the personal and familial benefits of being able to eat, drink water, and grow food. 😉

[Martin Eden]

70. Not sure what you mean by a "purer form of democracy"

I believe in having elected representatives, but our electoral system is corrupted by the legal bribery of campaign finance and the lack of rational civil discourse in our major media.

[Magoo48]

73. Purer form of democracy to me means citizens participate in lateral groups which aren't

organized around a teach and preach, top down structure. This equal status is maintained at levels all the way to leaders selected in one person one vote government funded elections which allow 0 corporate or personal money to infect the process. That sort of thing. Anything that will make government fully participatory and more difficult to corrupt.

[KY_EnviroGuy]

34. K&R. Well stated, Martin Eden.

One of my major concerns is our government bouncing from one extreme to the other with little consistency of policy, and not just with environmental concerns - also with economic, justice, commerce and immigration rules and regulations.

Both our international partners and our corporations like consistency in policy so they can make long-term plans. Republican extremists keep everything in turmoil and sometimes I believe they plan it that way.

Far too many humans on our planet are very short-sighted and care only about what happens in their little cultural bubble during their lifetimes.

KY.............

[Martin Eden]

69. Consistency of policy, and change

We need change, but in a consistent direction. The wild swings between D and R administrations is not good for our economy or alliances.

"Conservatism" used to mean resistence to radical change but the GOP has become radical rightwing, seeking to tear down rather than conserve.

Environmentally, they conserve nothing but the wealth and power of corporations.

[Magoo48]

87. Exactly, you nailed it.

Conserve is tantamount to demolish right now.

[Magoo48]

86. Reminds me of that saying about the wise old ones who plant trees under

shade they will never recline.

[malaise]

12. Plenty

Funny how many of us are either approaching 70 or older

[Bettie]

60. On the plus side (for me), I feel like the young pup

at 53!

Then I remember I have an 11 year old...poor planning! LOL.

[malaise]

63. You'll be on the right side of history

Those who care.

[Magoo48]

89. Yes, those who care.

Sometimes great caring is painful and difficult to unwind from, especially in situations where we’re truly powerless. It can be frustrating.

[NNadir]

14. I would say I'm a radical environmentalist but certainly not...

...in the surprisingly traditional way "radical" environmentalism is defined, which is essentially a Luddite approach.

I believe that it is at the edge of feasibility to make a sustainable world without effectively requiring expanded poverty and blind and ultimately environmentally destructive asceticism. This in my view can only be achieved by respect for science and engineering, a quality lacking on both the left and right.

This makes me a dissident and in the purest sense of the word's real meaning, a radical, I think.

[Bernardo de La Paz]

18. +1. Shifting to sustainable economics would generate jobs if done well. Germany & China eating US

... eating US lunch by getting a head start.

I'm not sure what makes the OP a radical. Seeking a sustainable economy seems common sense to me, not radical.

Of course to Republicons anything that interferes with the next quarterly profits is radical.

[NNadir]

32. Germany is a poor example. Their approach is about...

...as wrong headed as can be imagined.

It is this type of poor but popular thinking that has resulted in the dramatic acceleration of climate change.

Again, my views, while increasingly popular in the scientific community are not politically popular.

So called "renewable energy" did not work, is not working and will not work to displace dangerous fossil fuels.

The German nuclear phase out is sheer stupidity driven by fear and ignorance.

[Magoo48]

88. The OP wasn't meant to be radical. Radical is my personal stance and default position.

Especially around the climate catastrophe.

[Magoo48]

21. I also believe that we must "Unite Behind The Science"

and change in ways we can only now begin to understand, oh, and quite quickly.

[Javaman]

16. you are not alone, my friend.

I've voted Dem all my life for your same reasons.

I'm in my mid 50's, former NYC punk activist.

I've always slid hard left.

you meet me on the street and I appear to be mr. average guy, but beneath that veneer beats the heart of the punk that never left.

[AllaN01Bear]

20. if taking care of the sick and the elderly , the poor . taking care of our infastructure ,

make me radically libral , so be it.

[PatSeg]

23. What a lot of people identify as "radical"

these days is actually rational and human. It has been people on the right and republican operatives who have tagged liberal ideas as radical and leftist, in an effort to conjure up images of dangerous and extreme communists. They do that to any group or idea that interferes with their objectives.

To me radical is when people are willing to use violence and destruction to further their agenda. In the sixties, radicals bombed buildings, robbed banks, and justified violence because their cause and revolution were for the greater good.

Caring about the environment is sane and reasonable. It wasn't really all that long ago that most republicans thought it was an important issue and Nixon proposed the establishment of the EPA. What is radical today is how a large percentage of the population advocate things that contradict everything we associate with America.

I'm inclined to believe that perhaps you are a very normal person in a very abnormal time.

[KPN]

27. Spot on. nt

[Magoo48]

33. Rational and human. Yup

[Hortensis]

58. This!

[PatSeg]

82. Hi Hortensis!

[mathematic]

67. On the flip side, actual radicals exist and if somebody says they're one, believe them.

Putting a higher priority on standard liberal positions on the environment doesn't make somebody a radical. Just as putting a higher priority on standard liberal positions on social welfare doesn't make you a leftist. I'm not entirely sure why some people try to claim that they're radical or leftist when they're not. Maybe they like the superficial aesthetics of radicalism.

I've known radical environmentalists. Ecofacists, to be exact. One was an old roommate that came from a dedication to traditional fascism and tacked on environmentalist positions as an expression of ideal (european) civilization. The other was an environmentalist that was disillusioned with liberal democracy and slowly came to believe that only a fascist state could protect the environment. Needless to say, neither should be within 100 yards of a policymaking body.

So when people say their politics are abhorrent and then demand a seat at the table, I'm inclined to oppose that without getting into whether they're accurately characterizing their political beliefs or not.

[Magoo48]

74. Our language of labels and passion for sensationalizing our own particular neighborhood

on the spectrum while demonizing others with emotive language can be a confusing byproduct of human egoism. Guilty, I guess. I can’t imagine thinking my own politics are abhorrent; I like who I am politically and endeavor to represent myself accurately. I’m enjoying the responses here, glad I brought it up.

[PatSeg]

81. It was a good topic

I think in our passion, we often resort to superlatives, when most of what we are advocating is very sane and reasonable. I've been known to refer to myself as a "bleeding heart liberal", but really I'm just human trying to treat others the way I want to be treated.

I want clean air and water, good schools, affordable and accessible healthcare, safe neighborhoods, healthy food, decent housing, and honest representatives in government. And I want that for everyone else as well.

[Magoo48]

91. That's it. Me too...

[PatSeg]

95. That's rather what I figured

I think we've allowed the right's extreme descriptions of us over the past three decades take hold. Ironically in that time, we didn't become more extreme, but they most certainly did. And it all came to a head with the most extreme president in U.S. history. We are witnessing a real life example of "words matter".

[PatSeg]

80. Yes, every generation has

seen its fair share of true radicals, but it is really ridiculous when the right labels reasonable and liberal ideas as radical. It is a scare tactic and it inflames their ignorant base.

I know what you mean about some radicals. It is often like they are radical just for the sake of being radical. I think they choose positions just for an excuse to be outrageous and even violent.

[ArcticFox]

24. I guess I'm one too

Maybe becoming more so. I'm getting sick and tired of the support I'm seeing for platitudes, working with Republicans, doing what's presently possible, avoiding things because the votes aren't there. I think these attitudes are causing Democrats to lose votes. I've been trying to say so.

Now, after eleven years on here without a blocked thread I can recall, DU doesn't seem welcoming of my opinions anymore. I've had three posts removed and been banned from a group in the past week just for sharing some constructive criticism. DU doesn't seem to value my input.

Maybe I don't identify with Democrats anymore. But I'm certainly not a Republican. Is there a party where Radical fits in?

[KPN]

28. I may be wrong, but I would say we (the Democratic

Party) needs you. Don’t bail on the party. And don’t mistake DU for the party. The party is it’s members/it’s membership, not those who sometimes seem to lay claim to it.

[Hortensis]

62. Whatever's going on, it's not "DU" rejecting you.

Remember, though, DU is a refuge for Democrats to get away from lies and hostile attacks on the party, and there are rules enforcing that. There are plenty of other places to indulge opinions that are not acceptable here.

Btw, the only group I was ever banned from was the Sanders group in 2015, and that was by accident. I'm happy with special groups as subrefuges where people can go to agree and don't care to disturb them. But I was commenting on posts I ran into in "Latest Threads" and missing that I was critiquing (thoughtfully!) in a place where only groupthink and warm fuzzies were welcome. Mea culpa. Being banned fixed the problem for all of us.

[Magoo48]

78. I've never felt rejected here, just out of step at times.

I suppose at 71 I’m learning to moderate some. Perhaps. I see a singleness of purpose is needed right now until we move beyond the Orange Menace.

[Hortensis]

79. Good, and definitely yes to that last. Except I believe

the Republican leadership federally and in many red states has become a lot more dangerous.

[safeinOhio]

26. Be 70 real soon and love to tell

right(wrong)wingers I'm an old Marxist. In high school a teacher had us read Ayn Rand and it made sense to me. Then when I started college I got a factory job, read Marx and found he made more sense.

[spike jones]

29. No Compromise In Defense Of Mother Earth

Earth First!
Spike Jones was my forest name.
BTW I never spiked any trees. I looked like the entertainer Spike Jones, and the name served dual purposes.

[panader0]

30. I just turned 69 on last Saturday.

I'm a radical idealist. All one, peace and love type. I've had times when
I didn't live up to my beliefs, but I keep at it.

[Magoo48]

42. Guess I'm a bit of a radical compassionist as well.

Luckily, we aren’t saints. Like you I keep at it.

[List left]

31. I consider myself a conservative.

I believe in being honest.
I believe in being fair.
I believe in being kind.
I believe in taking care of our environment
I believe in conserving the earths resources for future generations.
I believe in nourishing the each other and the planet.
I believe hate is evil
I believe having compassion is being human, lack of compassion is inhuman.

I guess that makes me a radical.

[Magoo48]

43. Yup, pretty much.🧐

[jalan48]

35. Given where we are today after decades of corporate centrism

I think radical may be our only option.

[Magoo48]

45. I think you're right. I can't see any other path than massive political and economic reorganization,

at least with the environmental clock nearly at midnight.

[Paka]

36. Another septuagenarian "radical" checking in.

Thanks for asking.

[Magoo48]

47. I love septuagenaria, especially in light of the alternative.

[gibraltar72]

37. I'm from the democratic wing of the Democratic party.

[Magoo48]

76. That's good; I like that.

[ananda]

38. Another radical leftie here.

And I think the environment is our most critical issue!

[Magoo48]

48. Me too, ananda, me too.

[bdamomma]

65. our environment and saving our

wildlife, I guess I am too a proud Democrat/Liberal.

[Greybnk48]

39. I think I fit in that category.

I'm in your age group as well. I feel when we were younger our views were the views of Democrats, but our party has become much more moderate to conservative over the decades (of Rush, and Sikes, and FOX). But I will always vote Democratic FTW, like you.

[Magoo48]

50. Yup, I was always far left, but ever since Ronnie Raygun, the party has also moved further

and further to my right. I don’t believe it’s simply my lefty perception either.

[Greybnk48]

92. +1000 n/t

[brewens]

40. I'm a liberal Democrat which shouldn't be called radical, but these days it seems I am.

I think the term liberal Democrat should be redundant. I constantly hear the term progressive. IMO, that's people that have been frightened by the right to say liberal. They have demonized liberal and too many of us have backed down.

Now the PTB are pulling out all the stops to keep us from nominating a real liberal. The I got mine types are afraid of how much support a liberal will get.

[Magoo48]

53. I also believe the term liberal Democrat should be redundant.

I wish the party PTB would realize that restrained, demure uncertainty will not rally votes. Powerful, intelligent, imaginative new solutions, expressed with confidence and enthusiasm, will win the day. I’d like to see every candidate full throatedly committed to the Friday strikes on the 20th and the 27th, walking up front, speaking out in support of Greta and her followers.

[Bradshaw3]

41. Ha! You've all been outed

Let the purges begin.

I'm just kidding, OK. This is actually a great thread and I love the responses.

I'm a big tent Democrat who believes that every country is a mix of economic and social policies and that America needs more Harrington-style socialism and much, much less adoration of the dollar and the elites who endlessly crave them.

[elocs]

44. Radicalism does not go well with democracy.

Radicals are such a small percentage of the overall population that they have no hope of achieving their goal by the democratic process so they must seek to impose their goals upon people and if successful that doesn't result in democracy.

Here in America, if we are living in reality we would know that there are tens of millions of Americans, maybe up to 40% of the population who are conservatives, Trump supporters, who hate anything that even hints of being Liberal. If Democrats, much less radicals, were to take over control of our government, what would we do with them?
Reeducation camps? It's more likely there would be a civil war which usually is not good for democracy either.
But hey, we've got to keep those who are not with the program in line some way, don't we?

I'm 67 and I'm a moderate Democrat, one of those who get disparaged and put-down by the more liberal as being a "DINO" or "Republican Lite".
I've voted for and supported Democrats for 47 years now and will vote for the Democratic Party nominee next year even if it's that guy who is not a Democrat.

So I'm not a radical, never will be. There has to be at least one to break up this mutual admiration thread.

[Magoo48]

54. Perhaps, but full contact, vulture capitalism will absolutely destroy democracy.

And, destruction is what we are witnessing right now. New ideas across the board putting the 99% in absolute control of their own destiny with smaller, lateral, governing bodies, who see all problems through the lens of Climate Catastrophe, is the beginning of our next generations having a chance.

[Greybnk48]

94. How, exactly, are you defining a "radical" Dem?

Who do you view to be radical and why?

[GusBob]

46. Good on ya' but I think I would define radical differently

looking back...the takeover at Columbia, the SDS at Harvard confronting McManara and Dow, the bombing at UWMadison, the American Indian Movement takeover at Wounded Knee and etc that's radical to me.

I spent a month picking up rubbish in the tidal swamps of New Zealand as an "eco-tourist" It was more fun than radical in my opinion.
radical environmentalists would be those that spike trees to stop logging or block whaling ships and such

[Magoo48]

56. I have spent thousands of hours removing marine litter. I see direct action as my right to bitch.

While I won’t argue the merits of what is thought of as “traditional radicalism” I must say that I refuse, as best I can, to harm or endanger life or its environments. Of course, in our modern societies, our best can only be barely good enough.

[GusBob]

83. Prisoners, Probationaries, the poor and homeless pick up trash too

Who fights for their right to bitch?

[Magoo48]

84. We do, as best we can.

[Greybnk48]

96. I just asked someone else the same question.

I think of radical as you have defined it, taking unconventional or illegal steps to get a result.

In the context of politics, the only radicals I see today are radical Republicans who tamper with voting machines (illegal), draw illegal gerrymanders, hold votes in the middle of the night unannounced, and reinstate ugly Jim Crow laws to suppress minority votes. That's RADICAL!

It's NOT radical to want to ban your neighbor from owning a machine gun designed to kill humans, or wanting everyone to be treated medically without debt using our tax dollars. Or to extend public school on the front end for two or four years like we've done with 3K and 4K. None of this is radical. It's progress.

[joanbarnes]

49. me

[ismnotwasm]

51. Nope.

I have been shoved in radical left to center boxes for being a feminist, for being a Democrat, for being anti-racist. For environmentalism. For being a Social Justice Warriors-(like that’s a BAD thing) Admittedly, I didn’t become a Democrat until George W. Before that I voted socialist or some other far left “radical” third party.

For strongly supporting Hillary Clinton.

I’m not defining myself or my politics by rapidly shifting goalposts or the idea that basic human rights and the care of our planet is “radical”. Or the idea that love is love, and gender is fluid. Or that racism is a driving force behind modern politics and economics.

I’ll tell you attempting to discuss Whiteness as a concept will reveal how “radical” people really want to be.

I’m going to stay a Democrat and a Feminist, an anti-racist, an environmentalist and one who was on the right side of history given this current political fiasco.

[bluestarone]

52. 72 here and very much in your corner

Probably further left and bit more radical, BUT it's for the grand-kids and ALL youngsters today! Democrats are the ONLY ones that give a shit! TY for this thread!

[Hortensis]

55. So what's a "radical"? How refreshing to see some

identifying proudly, btw.

Sounds to me like you're a positive builder-type radical as in always wanting "more" and willing to look "outside the box" for solutions. Not dysfunctional radical as in must revolt to destroy the establishment, give me a bad leader and I will chew off my leg to spite my tail type.

I've never called myself radical even, or especially, when I was surrounded by radicals in radical times. I am a strong progressive liberal committed to properly using the power of establishment created by the people to serve them, but there should be some overlap. I've always been open to supposedly "radical" when that just means positive, innovative solutions and striving for the more and better we always know is possible.

In this era, though, older myself, I believe our nation's biggest problem that must be fixed is our divided electorate. We have fallen. That's entirely different from other times when I would never have guessed that someday I would believe so strongly in the need to rebuild the broken center I never considered myself part of that I would measure everything else by its contribution to that.

After all, even turning the government to the enormously existential climate crisis requires first getting the power to do it. And that requires engaging the will of the people.

[Magoo48]

57. People, including my mother, always told me, "Johnny, you're so radical." So, about 35 years ago,

I proudly adopted the mantle. I’ve been much happier ever since. I’m a radical compassionist and environmentalist. I believe in civil disobedience and direct action. I’m also in total agreement with your last paragraph. Thanks for sharing. I am also enjoying the posts here bigly.

[Hortensis]

66. This is a nice thread. I'm enjoying them also. Thanks.

[pbmus]

61. We not only Need radical, We Must have radical...

Our candidate Must be radical to make change happen....We cannot allow another hope candidate...We have to have a Change candidate...

[librechik]

64. "underground" used to mean something here, didn't it?. Not so much anymore

it wasn't much of a thing anyway. The mods here have always been strict and organized. You can't really say anything more controversial than the juries allow. But it's all quite fair and democratic as far as I can tell. I just do everything I can to not get alerted on. And I kind of hate myself for that. I've been here since 2001, and some fights you just know in advance will go nowhere.

I am upset about the number and type of subjects we are not allowed to discuss at all here.Since the beginning, in 2001. The sad fact is we are living in a world (not necessarily DU) where perception is managed by huge faceless interests superior to the populace, and if you don't see the funny monkey dance they're broadcasting, then you are an outsider and there's nothing you can do about it. 9/11 changed everything, as they say, but for gods sake never mention the mechanics of the event. Unless you go to the Dungeon. Nice image for a democracy but ha ha it's all in good fun. The official story will not be challenged in that case.

Self censorship is just an act of maturity and prudence in a public forum which is no doubt under FBI surveillance (Hi, Agent Mike! We call them Agent Mike) at the least.

While I don't welcome our alien overlords, I sure don't ignore them, even if they were born in Queens and look like a helium inflated roast pig suit. We need to be friends with everybody for our own survival. The environment is beyond our control, and the next very few years will be harsher than we can prepare ourselves for

However, I would still say that there are a lot of radicals participating in civil discourse here, and they get away with a lot. There is no other place so friendly and conversational and informative, all in one place. The navigation and web design are superb. So enjoy. At least it's not Daily Kos.

[Magoo48]

75. I do enjoy the group, and I'm glad I brought this topic up here. Thanks for sharing.

And, yes it is quite difficult to moderate what I really want to say sometimes. But, I’m learning to follow our guidelines. “Maturity and prudence”. I meet with a group of folks most mornings who claim they’ve passed from infancy to senility without ever passing through maturity.😉

[easttexaslefty]

68. Me

Always to the left of almost everyone.
Hello fellow radical. Pleased to meet you.

[Magoo48]

72. Back at ya, easttexaslefty...

[Lady Freedom Returns]

71. When it comes to homelessness, poverty..

Mental illness and equally for all. I'm as radical as you can get.

[HelpImSurrounded]

77. Maaaybe

I can’t send you private messages yet so right now I’m an activist in Schroedinger’s box.

[ck4829]

90. Welcome