Sen. Hirono calls for Kavanaugh impeachment inquiry

[RandySF]

Link to tweet

?s=21

[volstork]

18. Wish I were able to rec this comment.

Well-said.

[sharedvalues]

2. Critically, she asks for house judiciary to do it

[triron]

4. I wonder if Nadler can add this to his other investigations?

[real Cannabis calm]

3. recommended to publicize

[bucolic_frolic]

5. That strikes to the heart of the matter!

Rule of Law is stirring!

[BigmanPigman]

6. I heard on CNN that all the major Dem candidates

Last edited Sun Sep 15, 2019, 07:36 PM - Edit history (1)

are calling for impeachment of the perv. They are "waiting for Biden's opinion" for some reason.

[triron]

11. WTF does Biden have to give his opinion?

[BigmanPigman]

13. I have no idea?!?

[avebury]

7. K&R nt

[Piasladic]

8. Sentator Mazie Hirono

Thank you! Keep digging!

[onetexan]

10. +1 K&R

[Hortensis]

9. I'm up for it, but I REALLY want the documents of Kavanaugh's

work history, I read something like 100,000 from working for the Bush II admin alone. And all the others. What was his role advising the torture presidency? How about his possession of documents stolen from Democrats in congress?

What else is in those documents and others the Republicans hid and destroyed? He was a dirty political operative, the kind who at one time would only have been communicated with through cut-outs. So I'm sure a whole lot.

[leftieNanner]

12. And while we're at it

Let's look at those sketchy financial things that happened just before his Senate Hearings - $200K in debt disappears - buys a $1.2 million house (And you need to have good money to afford that mortgage!)….

This guys is so creepy and dirty.

[triron]

15. For sure. Still don't know who paid off his debts.

[wildflower]

14. Good

[George II]

16. If Senator Hirono says it, you can take it to the bank. One of the more thoughtful and understated..

...Senators in Washington.

[yellowdogintexas]

17. I love Senator Hirono. She is the new Sheroe in my life n/t

[Hekate]

20. I really like Senator Hirono

[hughee99]

21. Isn't the current house position on impeachment that they

Don’t have the vote in the senate?

[triron]

22. It's they don't have an ironclad case.

[hughee99]

23. You are saying that the house leadership doesn't believe they have

Enough evidence to prove that Trump broke the law? That doesn’t sound like anything I’ve been hearing. Some have been saying he’s clearly guilty, and let’s get started. Others have been saying, if we can’t get a conviction in the senate, it’s going to look like an exoneration. Who is saying, “we can’t sufficiently prove our case”?

And yes, I know speaker Pelosi says the case must be ironclad, but I’m asking who says that it’s not?

[meow2u3]

24. Three words: Senatorial. Jury. Nullification.

Moscow Mitch can be presented a slam-dunk prosecution that should compel him and the repukes in the Senate to vote to remove Kavanaugh from the bench, yet he'll still order the rethugs to vote to acquit. It's the Senatorial counterpart to jury nullification.

[hughee99]

26. So then what does it matter how "ironclad"

The case is and why they haven’t decided on charges yet?

[Bonx]

25. That should get it done. She has a lot of intergrity

[mahina]

27. God love her.