General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSmug, mediocre, Republican Congressman takes on Greta Thunberg--
Smug, mediocre, Republican Congressman takes on @GretaThunberg
Greta proceeds to:
-remind him she's a badass
-destroy the very premise of his question
-roast him when he misses her pt
Imagine a future w/Greta asking the q's. To get there, we must first heed her call to action.
VIDEO:
Link to tweet
demmiblue
(36,855 posts)Response to kpete (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)She should be Times Person of the Year, IMO.
live love laugh
(13,113 posts)Jim__
(14,077 posts)Is that really difficult for him to see?
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)Kid Berwyn
(14,907 posts)For the Memory Hole.
Niagara
(7,620 posts)superpatriotman
(6,249 posts)Look at his Wiki.
It lists his father as an engineer. Him as a lifelong politician.
Unqualified.
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)I am embarrassed by the actions of some fellow citizens who deserve scorn and voting out of office.
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)Response to saidsimplesimon (Reply #9)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
hatrack
(59,587 posts)EDIT
Those conversations seemed to have imprinted on Graves a certain caginess in how to talk about environmental change. People are awakening, he said, but the awakening was slow and partial enough that a certain care needed to be taken. Raise the words climate change or global warming, and everyone goes to their corners. Sounding a little exercised, Graves added, I mean, the phrase climate change, what does that even mean? When Graves launched his first campaign for Congress, in 2014, he criticized a more conservative challenger who called climate change a hoax, but he also ran in part on funds from the oil-and-gas industry, whom he supported in what might have been a damaging coastal-erosion lawsuit, brought by a local flood board. In my first campaign, the Environmental Defense Fund [PAC] maxed out their contributions to support us, Graves told me. He was smiling, enjoying the irony. So did the Koch brothers.
Gravess plans for bipartisan compromise do not include a carbon tax, which most environmental economists consider essential to staving off the worst possible futures. I asked him where he saw common ground with Democrats, beyond spending on adaptation and resilience. Step two is emissions reductions, Graves said. Weve got to reduce our emissions in the United States. So we need to be moving toward renewables, updating our grid system, investing in energy-storage technologies, and figuring out how we can do a better job providing energy-storage solutions. If youre a liberal, thats my pitch to you. Graves said that he supported President Trumps decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris accords, because the agreement gave China, classified as a developing country, more lenient targets for emissions reductions. But he thought America might just innovate its way to those same reductions. I think we can actually hit Paris targets without doing damage to the American economyI really do.
What he planned to do with his new public role on the Climate Crisis Committee, he said, was to talk about climate change in other termsmore local and less threatening. To a liberal, he might talk about the need to invest in renewable energy or alter emissions standards, he said, but to a Tea Party conservative hed take a different tack. Hey, I have an idea that can lower your electricity bills. Or, I have an idea that can complement what you and President Trump have done, to improve the competitiveness of the U.S. economy, Graves said. Im talking about the same thing in that liberal conversation and that conservative conversation. But its approaching it differently and meeting people where they are.
EDIT
Some climate activists whom I spoke with suggested that adaptation and mitigation could serve as a gateway drug for the Republican Party, but it seemed to me that Graves was clear about how far he and his voters could go. Graves has worked with Jared Huffman, a Democrat from Northern California, on fisheries legislation. I asked Huffman, who chairs the Water, Oceans, and Wildlife Subcommittee, whether he thought that bipartisan progress on climate legislation with Republicans like Graves was realistic. Graves seemed enthusiastic, I said, about making major investments in renewable-energy sources like wind and solar. In theory, Huffman said. But Republicans were still boxed in by their alignment with the oil-and-gas industry. I think, for Garret to get out of that box, hes got to reimagine what the Louisiana economy is.
EDIT
https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-political-scene/a-louisiana-republican-reckons-with-climate-change