Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnyone else want to learn the substance of the Whistleblower complaint BEFORE we count chickens?
There's plenty else to impeach on (payments to Stormy Daniels, coordination with Rusher, etc.), but I'd like some substantiation.
"When you strike at a King, you must kill him." RW Emerson
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anyone else want to learn the substance of the Whistleblower complaint BEFORE we count chickens? (Original Post)
maxsolomon
Sep 2019
OP
Vinca
(53,555 posts)1. I still can't figure out why "unindicted co-conspirator" wasn't enough.
maxsolomon
(38,393 posts)2. I think it is.
But this one tipped the caucus over the edge. I'd like to learn who, what, where, when...
Quemado
(1,262 posts)3. Yes - we don't know how many roadblocks will get thrown up
to prevent acquisition of an unredacted complaint.
AkFemDem
(2,508 posts)4. Pelosi did not take this on without knowing what's in that report.
Its very damning.
maxsolomon
(38,393 posts)5. Fun dayn moyl zu Got's oyem
From your mouth to God's ears.
Kaleva
(40,281 posts)6. Failure to turn over whistle blower's complaint to Congress is in itself a violation of law
Dennis Donovan
(31,059 posts)7. Yes, but Trump/Giuliani already rolled dimes on themselves...
...enough to get Trump impeached. The report will be icing on the cake.
