Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kevin McCarthy's spending at Trump's properties increased 32,000 percent after trump elected (Original Post) Demovictory9 Sep 2019 OP
K & R...for visibility...nt Wounded Bear Sep 2019 #1
I'm super surprised. RockRaven Sep 2019 #2
Couldn't that be conceived as a bribe? Kablooie Sep 2019 #3
Without specific quid pro quo how would it be any different than anyone spending money PoliticAverse Sep 2019 #6
Domestic emoluments violation is more open and shut. McCarthy is the senate minority leader uponit7771 Sep 2019 #11
Imagine if Presidents could accept speaking fees while in office... PoliticAverse Sep 2019 #4
Whyyyyy so Trumpy? O.o NCLefty Sep 2019 #5
McCarthy's speech yesterday after Pelosi's announcement vlyons Sep 2019 #7
Lock him up!! onetexan Sep 2019 #8
Too bad his district won't ever hear this and he is bullet proof there in Bakersfield kimbutgar Sep 2019 #9
I have long believed that the Con has the good on Kevin malaise Sep 2019 #10
I think he has the goods on a lot of them Andy823 Sep 2019 #12
Yes indeed malaise Sep 2019 #13

Kablooie

(18,603 posts)
3. Couldn't that be conceived as a bribe?
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 01:19 AM
Sep 2019

Trump accepting the money is unconstitutional but isn't the person paying him, a bribe, which is a crime too?

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
6. Without specific quid pro quo how would it be any different than anyone spending money
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 01:49 AM
Sep 2019

at a Trump property?

Are groups paying Congress members or Supreme Court justices large fees for short speeches committing bribery?

Hard to know for sure which is one good argument against all such payments.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
4. Imagine if Presidents could accept speaking fees while in office...
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 01:42 AM
Sep 2019

like Congress members or Supreme Court justices.

NCLefty

(3,678 posts)
5. Whyyyyy so Trumpy? O.o
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 01:45 AM
Sep 2019

They don't even try to hide it. 32,000%... I'm not sure I've ever heard a percentage that high in my life. :p

vlyons

(10,252 posts)
7. McCarthy's speech yesterday after Pelosi's announcement
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 02:03 AM
Sep 2019

left me completely disgusted. I was left wondering if he actually believed his own bullshit about how it's all Dem's made-up charges, because we're pissed that Trump won the election of 2016, and we're trying to reverse the election.

I got this image in my mind of rats in a sewer feasting on disgusting waste going "hmmm yummy meal," because they don't know they are in a sewer. Is McCarthy really that darkly delusional? Does he know that he's feasting on filth?

kimbutgar

(21,028 posts)
9. Too bad his district won't ever hear this and he is bullet proof there in Bakersfield
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 04:05 AM
Sep 2019

All those brain damaged by the chemicals in the agricultural district who keep voting for him because they have been brainwashed into thinking the Democratic Party wants to take their water Bakersfield is also one of the most foul smelling places outside of the cattle farms on i5 in California. Between him and Nunes that part of California is hoodwinked by right wing radio, fox and Sinclair.

malaise

(268,576 posts)
10. I have long believed that the Con has the good on Kevin
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 06:25 AM
Sep 2019

Never forget that it was Kevin who said that Putin pays the Con
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/house-majority-leader-to-colleagues-in-2016-i-think-putin-pays-trump/2017/05/17/515f6f8a-3aff-11e7-8854-21f359183e8c_story.html

<snip>
House majority leader to colleagues in 2016: ‘I think Putin pays’ Trump
By Adam EntousMay 17, 2017
The 2016 conversation Paul Ryan wanted to keep private
A month before Donald Trump clinched the Republican nomination, one of his closest allies in Congress — House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy — made a politically explosive assertion in a private conversation on Capitol Hill with his fellow GOP leaders: that Trump could be the beneficiary of payments from Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“There’s two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump,” McCarthy (R-Calif.) said, according to a recording of the June 15, 2016, exchange, which was listened to and verified by The Washington Post. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher is a Californian Republican known in Congress as a fervent defender of Putin and Russia.

House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) immediately interjected, stopping the conversation from further exploring McCarthy’s assertion, and swore the Republicans present to secrecy.

malaise

(268,576 posts)
13. Yes indeed
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 09:48 AM
Sep 2019

although I think he has more goods on them than Putin - the family values posse think their sexual peccadilloes are hidden

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kevin McCarthy's spending...