Sun Sep 29, 2019, 02:49 PM
RainCaster (6,835 posts)
Have you read the Whistle-blower's Complaint yet? You must!
Too many people say "no", but everyone should read it for themselves. This will take you 15 - 30 minutes to read, and this is truly historical in nature.
You will be conversing with many people who have strong opinions and yet have not read it for themselves. Let them know that they need to do their own research, and that they must begin by reading it unadorned and in its entirety. If this is true, his goose is cooked. Not only did DFT insist that a foreign government interfere with a coming US election, he also asked Ukraine to take credit for interfering in the 2016 election. This would only benefit Russia, not the US, not DFT, and certainly not Ukraine. Think about that for a minute--our Traitor in Chief is lobbying for one of our country's biggest enemies to another foreign power.
|
11 replies, 1557 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
RainCaster | Sep 2019 | OP |
eppur_se_muova | Sep 2019 | #1 | |
RainCaster | Sep 2019 | #3 | |
eppur_se_muova | Sep 2019 | #5 | |
Cartoonist | Sep 2019 | #2 | |
RainCaster | Sep 2019 | #4 | |
Claritie Pixie | Sep 2019 | #6 | |
Control-Z | Sep 2019 | #8 | |
lunatica | Sep 2019 | #9 | |
liberalla | Sep 2019 | #11 | |
FBaggins | Sep 2019 | #7 | |
Garrett78 | Sep 2019 | #10 |
Response to RainCaster (Original post)
Sun Sep 29, 2019, 02:52 PM
eppur_se_muova (32,422 posts)
1. DJT
DFT is Density Functional Theory.
|
Response to eppur_se_muova (Reply #1)
Sun Sep 29, 2019, 02:54 PM
RainCaster (6,835 posts)
3. Not in my lexicon
Donald F@ing Trump
|
Response to RainCaster (Reply #3)
Sun Sep 29, 2019, 02:55 PM
eppur_se_muova (32,422 posts)
5. Oh ... THAT F !
(To be honest, I half guessed that.)
![]() |
Response to RainCaster (Original post)
Sun Sep 29, 2019, 02:53 PM
Cartoonist (6,534 posts)
2. Fake whistle!
They're already jumping on that second hand BS. The report has zero credibility with them. And the Mueller report completely exonerated Trump.
|
Response to Cartoonist (Reply #2)
Sun Sep 29, 2019, 02:55 PM
RainCaster (6,835 posts)
4. Another report of treason they haven't read.
Response to RainCaster (Original post)
Sun Sep 29, 2019, 02:56 PM
Claritie Pixie (2,197 posts)
6. I read it and listened to the audio readout. Highly recommended! Here's the link:
Response to Claritie Pixie (Reply #6)
Sun Sep 29, 2019, 03:11 PM
Control-Z (15,549 posts)
8. I started listening to the audio version
but fell asleep. Now I have to figure out at what point that was. Lol. I plan to finish it today/tonight.
|
Response to Claritie Pixie (Reply #6)
Sun Sep 29, 2019, 05:14 PM
liberalla (5,938 posts)
11. Thank you for that link!
Response to RainCaster (Original post)
Sun Sep 29, 2019, 02:58 PM
FBaggins (21,000 posts)
7. Except that Ukraine DID try to interfere in the 2016 election
It was reported right around the inauguration.
|
Response to RainCaster (Original post)
Sun Sep 29, 2019, 03:27 PM
Garrett78 (10,721 posts)
10. I read it as soon as it became available, but it isn't enough.
Dems need to turn up a lot more for Trump's goose to be cooked. The Republican Party is one of the most dangerous and corrupt organizations in the world today, and it'll take a mountain of hard evidence to bring down Trump.
What will Volker tell Congress? What, if anything, will Pompeo and other State Department officials tell Congress? What, if anything, will Barr tell Congress? Will the whistleblower (or any of the dozen witnesses referenced) speak with Congress and potentially be exposed? If Brechbuhl did listen to the call, why is the State Department denying that he did? What did Pence discuss with Ukrainian officials? What all did Atkinson tell the House and the Senate? Regarding the 3 former officials that reportedly told the Washington Post about comments Trump made to those Russian officials in 2017, what else do they have to say and will any of them say it publicly? Will Democrats get their hands on the server? So many questions that need answers. |