General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDennis Donovan
(31,059 posts)Response to EveHammond13 (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Mike 03
(18,690 posts)machoneman
(4,128 posts)Now that the dam has irretrievably broken, lots of folks are coming forward with grim tales of Trump's so, so many lies, fabrications, law breaking endeavors and more! Geez, it is hard to keep up with the indictable offenses as they keep pouring out in droves.
Could not happen to a more deserving asshole!
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)a subpoena. Really why isn't this being done? You don't have to be convicted of a crime to be disbarred
Maraya1969
(23,515 posts)beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)FBaggins
(28,706 posts)Lawyers contest subpoenas all the time.
If someone ignored a subpoena and the House took them to court... and then the court enforced the subpoena... then you could lose your license for failing to comply with a court order.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)whole point here.
FBaggins
(28,706 posts)They just haven't resulted in any rulings yet... which is why Democrats are trying to avoid them in this case. They can't wait several months for the fight to work through the courts. Instead, they're just insisting on document production with the threat that refusal to do so will be considered as obstruction and result in another potential impeachment count.
But the misunderstanding here is the difference between subpoenas related to civil/criminal court cases, and those from Congress to a co-equal branch of government. In the former, the executive branch (prosecutors) have received permission from the judicial branch to force you to show up in court (or product documents, etc.). BUT the judicial branch recognizes that you haven't had an opportunity to give your side, so you can go to the judge and ask that the subpoena be "quashed". You're basically appealing the court's decision to approve the prosecutors' request. Absent that appeal, the subpoena is presumed to be valid and you can't ignore it.
Congressional subpoenas are different. They aren't pre-vetted by a judge. Their presumed validity is further damaged when the subpoena targets the executive branch. If a conflict ensues, the most common path is for the target of the subpoena to refuse to comply - which forces Congress to take the matter to court. Such matters usually end up with a negotiated agreement between the two branches, because neither is certain who would win in court.
BootinUp
(51,481 posts)IronLionZion
(51,425 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,848 posts)filed a complaint with the Virginia Bar about Barr. Not sure if it ever went anywhere.
https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/reps-lieu-and-rice-call-bar-investigation-conduct-william-barr
BumRushDaShow
(170,777 posts)SallyHemmings
(1,970 posts)50 Shades Of Blue
(11,436 posts)pwb
(12,719 posts)It's a good punch to the bullies who ignore law. Hope it hurts.
orangecrush
(30,678 posts)Mike 03
(18,690 posts)JT45242
(4,066 posts)Barr stated he did not know that telling someone to lie under oath was a crime.
He should have been disbarred at that very moment -- either he did not know the law or lied under oath.
Suborning perjury is covered in the first legal ethics class in law school.
This is far too little and far too late.
Unless he ends up cuffed and stuffed in a police car and then placed in general population in prison, it will never be enough.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Pepsidog
(6,365 posts)Bluethroughu
(7,215 posts)FORWARD!
BigmanPigman
(55,315 posts)flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)He never should have been confirmed in the first place; he's so clearly Trump's toady, running around the globe doing his bidding to get dirt on a political opponent.
RainCaster
(13,778 posts)I know a number of people who are attorneys by trade, and everyone of them is honest and strives to meet the intent of all guidance pertaining to ethics in law. Billy Barr is a different kind of animal- he is paid by all taxpayers, yet he acts as the personal attorney to the SCROTUS. (So Called Ruler Of The United States)
He should be locked up in a small cage on the Southern border for the rest of his unnatural life. Maybe even a few more years for good measure. Then his carcass should be shipped to Russia for disposal.
Response to RainCaster (Reply #17)
EveHammond13 This message was self-deleted by its author.
johnnyfins
(3,855 posts)Almost spit coffee at my screen
Perseus
(4,341 posts)That sounded good...It is mind boggling, so much education just to become common criminals, Barr and Pompeo.
ancianita
(43,313 posts)Marie Marie
(11,380 posts)I would think that this is a no-brainer given his flouting of the law but I'm not an expert.
EveHammond13
(2,855 posts)so, as is famously said, "We'll see what happens."
Marie Marie
(11,380 posts)mysteryowl
(9,333 posts)trof
(54,274 posts)How's THAT for lazy?
gademocrat7
(11,984 posts)Finally. Thank you, Representative Pascrell.
Mr. Ected
(9,714 posts)Aided and abetted by an American people neutralized by systemic propaganda.
Cha
(319,610 posts)not the worst and our country and Planet are in it's clutches.
We're Fighting Back Hard
Cha
(319,610 posts)BlueJac
(7,838 posts)bucolic_frolic
(55,440 posts)Don't count me optimistic
UTUSN
(77,795 posts)cp
(8,331 posts)Nitram
(27,924 posts)tclambert
(11,194 posts)Somehow I don't think Dopey Donny would mind.
BootinUp
(51,481 posts)UCmeNdc
(9,655 posts)ecstatic
(35,088 posts)We're so desperate for the trump-led crime spree to end. Every action taken in that effort is so greatly appreciated.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)Faux pas
(16,439 posts)Couldn't happen to a nicer guy