General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI want to say I got it wrong
Last week I was saying that Pelosi had taken a huge risk, waiting for the president to commit another major crime before impeaching.
But after today I take that back. The sheer rate and volume of crimes being committed by this president and administration is just flabbergasting.
So many Republican criminals. So many Republican crimes. Nancy was right and I was wrong. This moment was just inevitable and she was right to wait for an opportune moment.
dawg day
(7,947 posts)because Giuliani said she wasn't sufficiently loyal and helpful. (Or rather, she was TOO LOYAL... to the United States.)
And even today, he took advantage of the opportunity to slam her== he'd "heard very bad things about her."
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/03/politics/wsj-trump-yovanovitch-recall/index.html
Moostache
(11,179 posts)They will keep running Trump's Biden allegations over and over and over (JUST LIKE 'No Collusion', 'Total vindication')...and yet, when the orange demented yam rambles on with non-specific OBVIOUS lies ("I'm hearing...", "Many, many people are saying...", "very bad", "terrible", "nasty", etc.) they go goddamn MUTE...
When he says "heard very bad things...", they should ALL DEMAND that he clarify, chapter and verse, with attestations exact WHO said WHAT and WHEN...and NO OTHER QUESTIONS or press events AT ALL should occur until he answers.
No more BS.
No more Bullying.
No more lying.
FUCK HIM and demand answers until he gets so mad he DOES die of a heart attack on camera...
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)The fact that that moment got so much attention speaks to how rare it is, even though what Mason did should be standard operating procedure. It's like Nicole Wallace or CNN doing real-time fact-checking. It seems amazing, yet it should have been the norm all along.
Many factors contributed to what happened in 2016, including Russia and Comey and race-based voter suppression. But the mainstream press also deserves a lot of blame, and that doesn't get talked about nearly enough. I'll never forgive the likes of Andrea Emails Mitchell.
Trump and other Republicans constantly get away with lies and vague, baseless remarks such as "I heard very bad things about her."
Mind you, Dems should do a much better job of messaging, of establishing the dominant narrative. But the media in the US is, on the whole, woefully inept.
czarjak
(13,639 posts)And Cackling Nicolle can go fuck herself until she rebukes her Bush years.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)czarjak
(13,639 posts)It wasn't many factors, it was rigged. Period.
czarjak
(13,639 posts)dawg day
(7,947 posts)" Give us an example." They must push him on these insults.
mucifer
(25,667 posts)they do a top of the hour news for a few minutes. The day before they did explain impeachment better. But, Friday it was all pro trump.
Moostache
(11,179 posts)I cannot believe my eyes daily - nay, HOURLY, of late.
Tragedy has befallen our nation.
NCLefty
(3,678 posts)Lock him up.
(9,787 posts)There should be laws voted mandating all nominees to disclose their tax returns 3 months before elections, for example (just one, although there should be many more).
tirebiter
(2,699 posts)He is a Trump supporter
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Cha
(319,079 posts)some are doubling down.
It was the perfect time.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)She was so right!
betsuni
(29,078 posts)Good for you for saying this!
Roy Rolling
(7,632 posts)First-time elected politician Trump meet Nancy Pelosi, who has forgotten more about politics than Trump and his cabal will ever know.
She correctly recognized Trump is incorrigible, and he will up the ante with every offense he commits.
How she acts on that superior perception is always fresh and impactful. She isnt playing for second-place, shes playing to win.
And the only way for Trump to win is to not play the game at all.
Lock him up.
(9,787 posts)... in the end.
He wants to pretend he isn't.
mcar
(46,058 posts)Nancy said he'd impeach himself. She was so right.
wryter2000
(47,940 posts)Thank you.
Aussie105
(7,920 posts)Trump has always behaved like that.
'Loyal to me? Yep, you can stray.
'Loyalty lies elsewhere?' Nope, you go away. And expect some nastiness on Twitter from me!
He brazenly avoided any exterior factors when he was elected that might have interfered with his business model, like how past presidents behaved, emolument details, the Constitution (just to mention a couple), and he was free to do business as usual.
What Trump doesn't know, he doesn't need to take any notice of. That's his thinking. It's the reason why he kept advisors at arm's length, and often ignored them totally.
Now I'm not saying Trump started off in business this way, but over the years his approach morphed into that of a Mafia boss.
Really sad though, and underlines his desperation, to see him ring leaders of foreign countries and basically saying 'You like me don't you? If you want to do business with the US, prove you are on my side by giving me dirt on those who want to hurt me.'
Nancy saw it right. It was only a matter of time.
OnDoutside
(20,868 posts)documents and witnesses. Now he has given us what is needed, on the Ukraine issue, Pelosi can impeach. People were screaming for months to launch an inquiry when Dems were in court trying to free evidence and witnesses from Trump's clutches.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)I still think we should have had more aggressive inquiries and used inherent contempt.
But thats starting to happen now and I am happy.
OnDoutside
(20,868 posts)and witnesses, leaving Pelosi with the fear that you'd create the Impeachment Inquiry, and then you'd be bogged down in the courts for months (which turned out to be the case), trying to get his tax returns and compelling Trump Admin staff to appear. It could have gone the way of the Mueller Report, in being strangled. The difference now, and why he WILL be impeached, is because they have clear evidence of him demanding Ukraine investigate Biden. It's why Pelosi wants to impeach on this narrow case, and not get bogged down in widening it. Once they win some of the cases currently working their way through the courts, then they can add those at that stage.
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)many of us believe he committed impeachable acts already, long before Ukraine. We will never know if he had been challenged long ago if it might have slowed his reign of terror. That said, everyone needs to move fast and stand up unequivocally.
moonscape
(5,724 posts)couldn't do something. But as he put his criminal toes in the water and suffered no consequences he was emboldened. No, I don't know what consequences we had the power to inflict, but wish we could have grabbed the narrative. The public statements about not impeaching always bothered me.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)To come on board? Why we won't have a vote to simply declare that the House majority wants to have an inquiry? There is something to me to standing up for what is right. If the strategy is to wait until we find out worse things trump has done..well how stupid will they look to vote no, in retrospect?
moonscape
(5,724 posts)My frustration has been watching what seemed like tortured political calculation when I'm not convinced any political genius could diagram this cluster and get it except by nearly random chance. Uncharted territory. Unprecedented. All those words we live with daily.
We have leaders on both sides not acting until they feel assured of an outcome, though McConnell's calculations are sinister and ours aren't. But I always thought the process would bring people along if - and because - we have right on our side. And if in the end it didn't, we'd still be doing what is right. And doing what's right doesn't seem like such a massive gamble to me.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Been doing working so far? Why not try something different? How could we be worse off? I have heard quite often the right saying Democrats hate trump. And that is why they are trying to nail him. What substantiates this is that he doesn't get punished or held accountable. IOW, the thought that if people who hate him can't stop him then he must not have done anything that bad.
Perseus
(4,341 posts)this one is clear cut. Now, think about this, what if the idiot had not offered something like the Ukraine thing? Was Pelosi supposed to continue waiting for something like it to happen? What if it never happened?
There was mass frustration that Democrats already had multiple evidence of crimes and misdemeanors from the creature and Pelosi was waiting for a magic thing to happen, good for her that it did happen and I hope that more whistleblowers come forward as it seems they are to put the whole thing to rest, but as I said, there was plenty of evidence and Pelosi did not seem to be moving in the right direction.
Because of all that, I don't think you were wrong. I just hope Democrats don't limit themselves to this one Ukraine thing, they need to come forward with everything they've got, and they have a lot. No question that this is the most corrupt POTUS in the history of this country, and the most corrupt administration, it almost makes the Nixon administration seem like a convent.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)on finding witnesses to the call itself...because no way no how will we ever get the real phone transcript. Dipshit will take it to the SC where he placed her s buds.