Trump says he would love to let Sondlan testify but those democrats don't want the facts to come out

[Botany]

Link to tweet

BTW Sondland had zero qualifications to be in his position outside of giving Trump 1 million $s
for his inauguration.

[CincyDem]

1. "That says it ALL"....and I should know...cuz I wrote it. That's what DJT should be tweeting. n/t

[Zambero]

2. If he is indeed a "good man"

and testifies under oath, would Sondland be speaking truth to any questions from committee members of either party? Remember, the guy is "good", and those who are good are also truthful. So what's to worry about, unless a guilty party is hell bent on suppressing facts that are pertinent to this investigation?

[ScratchCat]

3. So Trump just admitted

That he ordered Pompeo to tell Sondland to not testify.

What a dumbass. Guess they wont need to get Pomp to confirm it under oath.

[Botany]

4. 1 more impeachment charge

Obstruction of Congress.

[dalton99a]

5. Exactly.

[struggle4progress]

6. "We just prefer tweeting to testifying under oath"

[LastDemocratInSC]

7. Choosing Sondland to be an ambassador is like choosing "Billy from down at the tire shop"