HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Breaking - DOJ is handing...

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:15 AM

Breaking - DOJ is handing over unredacted Mueller Report info to the

House Committee.
Barr apparently is afraid of ending up like Mitchell.

103 replies, 14507 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 103 replies Author Time Post
Reply Breaking - DOJ is handing over unredacted Mueller Report info to the (Original post)
malaise Oct 2019 OP
LineReply !
Kali Oct 2019 #1
Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2019 #79
malaise Oct 2019 #89
Mister Ed Oct 2019 #2
malaise Oct 2019 #4
Mister Ed Oct 2019 #8
getagrip_already Oct 2019 #64
Johnny2X2X Oct 2019 #5
malthaussen Oct 2019 #3
malaise Oct 2019 #6
dchill Oct 2019 #32
Botany Oct 2019 #7
malaise Oct 2019 #18
Botany Oct 2019 #22
malaise Oct 2019 #26
lagomorph777 Oct 2019 #58
Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2019 #75
lagomorph777 Oct 2019 #76
emmaverybo Oct 2019 #30
dchill Oct 2019 #33
Botany Oct 2019 #47
dchill Oct 2019 #60
Botany Oct 2019 #65
dchill Oct 2019 #66
Botany Oct 2019 #73
dchill Oct 2019 #74
Doremus Oct 2019 #77
Botany Oct 2019 #82
amywalk Oct 2019 #99
Iliyah Oct 2019 #9
CentralMass Oct 2019 #101
Bettie Oct 2019 #10
malaise Oct 2019 #20
Bettie Oct 2019 #24
pnwmom Oct 2019 #45
MarkmBha1 Oct 2019 #11
Mme. Defarge Oct 2019 #12
Dennis Donovan Oct 2019 #13
tavalon Oct 2019 #16
renate Oct 2019 #28
machoneman Oct 2019 #41
elleng Oct 2019 #14
tavalon Oct 2019 #17
elleng Oct 2019 #19
sprinkleeninow Oct 2019 #38
kag Oct 2019 #86
amywalk Oct 2019 #100
tavalon Oct 2019 #15
malaise Oct 2019 #21
W_HAMILTON Oct 2019 #23
malaise Oct 2019 #25
Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2019 #83
BSdetect Oct 2019 #27
Newest Reality Oct 2019 #29
vsrazdem Oct 2019 #31
Leghorn21 Oct 2019 #34
superpatriotman Oct 2019 #35
Hoyt Oct 2019 #37
StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #36
TidalWave46 Oct 2019 #44
Gothmog Oct 2019 #39
dlk Oct 2019 #40
True Blue American Oct 2019 #69
dlk Oct 2019 #72
hlthe2b Oct 2019 #42
TidalWave46 Oct 2019 #43
ScratchCat Oct 2019 #48
ancianita Oct 2019 #46
blogslut Oct 2019 #49
hlthe2b Oct 2019 #51
Takket Oct 2019 #91
Jim__ Oct 2019 #50
EveHammond13 Oct 2019 #52
Peace06 Oct 2019 #53
rurallib Oct 2019 #55
pecosbob Oct 2019 #54
George II Oct 2019 #56
EveHammond13 Oct 2019 #57
ffr Oct 2019 #59
NCjack Oct 2019 #61
True Blue American Oct 2019 #70
zentrum Oct 2019 #62
0rganism Oct 2019 #63
kentuck Oct 2019 #67
BadgerMom Oct 2019 #68
liberalla Oct 2019 #71
Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2019 #78
eleny Oct 2019 #80
Guy Whitey Corngood Oct 2019 #81
malaise Oct 2019 #85
Guy Whitey Corngood Oct 2019 #88
malaise Oct 2019 #90
Guy Whitey Corngood Oct 2019 #92
40RatRod Oct 2019 #84
Bonx Oct 2019 #93
justie18 Oct 2019 #102
dajoki Oct 2019 #87
dhol82 Oct 2019 #94
milestogo Oct 2019 #95
orleans Oct 2019 #96
NCLefty Oct 2019 #97
wishstar Oct 2019 #98
dajoki Oct 2019 #103

Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:18 AM

1. !

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Kali (Reply #1)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 03:16 PM

79. Link, somebody? I can't find a link on a news search engine to anything resembling the OP. . . . nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #79)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 04:18 PM

89. Still can't find a link n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:21 AM

2. Redacted, or unredacted?

Wan't the redacted report was delivered months ago?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mister Ed (Reply #2)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:23 AM

4. Thanks Mr Ed

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #4)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:25 AM

8. Thanks for the edit, and for this early alert.

This could be huge.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mister Ed (Reply #8)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 01:28 PM

64. Unredacted or unedited?

They haven't turned over an honest document yet.

Hopefully the house will ask Mueller if it is indeed complete and accurate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mister Ed (Reply #2)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:23 AM

5. My thoughts too

The redacted version has been available to the public for months. They not only need the un-redacted versions, they need the Grand Jury testimony and evidence.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:23 AM

3. "Redacted," forsooth?

One should not hand over redacted materials to an oversight committee. It kind of makes a mockery of the word "Oversight."

On edit: ah, "unredacted." Forget I spoke.

From where I sit,Mr Barr is worthy of a far worse fate than Mr Mitchell.

-- Mal

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malthaussen (Reply #3)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:24 AM

6. Unredacted - corrected and I agree with you re

Barr v Mitchell

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malthaussen (Reply #3)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:50 AM

32. The devil is in the redactions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:25 AM

7. And this is why Trump has been sending people like Barr, Pompeo, Giuliani, and others all ...

... over the world to find "dirt" on the investigations that led to the Mueller report because they can't argue the facts of the case so they have to argue about the processes from which those facts arose. But at the end of the day multiple intelligence agencies all over the
world have one overarching conclusion and that is Russia fucked with our elections and both the Trump campaign and many republicans were well aware of what was going on @ the time.

******


“If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell”


― Carl Sandburg

******
Everybody should remember what Trump said when he was told that Mueller was going to investigate Trump & Russia,
"I'm fucked. This is the end of my Presidency."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #7)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:33 AM

18. +1,000

And that's the truth - they know the truth is coming so they need some fake shit

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #18)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:37 AM

22. The Mueller Report (which we have not seen) is going to be devastating for Trump and company.

Multiple intel agencies form many different countries along with our own intel agencies
no doubt have the goods on Trump and Russia and their crimes.

https://themoscowproject.org/explainers/trumps-russia-cover-up-by-the-numbers-70-contacts-with-russia-linked-operatives/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #22)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:42 AM

26. I can't wait

Truth will out

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #18)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 01:03 PM

58. Would have been less risky to make up fake shit. This 3 Stooges diplomacy is just nuts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lagomorph777 (Reply #58)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 03:03 PM

75. Yeah but they drink their own koolade & swim in swamp full of conspiracy theories


They actually believe there is a there there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #75)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 03:08 PM

76. Maybe some believe that. I'm sure most know better.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #7)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:45 AM

30. Excellent post. And love me some Carl Sandburg.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #7)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:53 AM

33. And how many will die because of Barr's illegal stall tactics?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dchill (Reply #33)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:38 PM

47. Not only Barr's tactics but Trump and Putin too

We are dealing with the largest international crime syndicate in history. As per dead people we have the one in Florida who is linked to Roger Stone, Jeffrey Epstein, and a bunch of Russians. One who got pushed out of a 5th floor window by his bath tub.

Barr is the consigliere to this operation and Trump is Vlad's useful idiot. See him giving up Eastern Ukraine (oil, gas, and pipelines) and Syria (pipelines) to Putin.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #47)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 01:10 PM

60. Agreed. They all assumed their offices with...

...a Bizarro World level of criminal intent. All of them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dchill (Reply #60)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 01:32 PM

65. Vlad and Russia have been working "the long game" with Trump for 20+ years

Russian money propped him up and Russia helped to finance "The Apprentice" in order to
sell to a certain segment of gullible Americans that Trump was some kind of billionaire business
genius when in reality nothing could be further from the truth.

This "thing" is so big that no one person or even a group of persons could get their head or heads
around it. I think the only person who really understands all the machinations of this international
criminal operation is Vlad himself.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #65)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 01:37 PM

66. I know - I thought enough people knew this...

..that he'd never even come close to the presidency.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dchill (Reply #66)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 02:44 PM

73. I think Trump lost by a much bigger margin then 3,000,000 votes

The Brennan Institute showed that 16 million people were removed before the 2016 election.

https://politicalwire.com/2019/05/15/almost-16-million-removed-from-voter-rolls/

But Russia and the right wing fed into the "I hate Hillary" because she is a d**e b***h w/a
liberal agenda so that Trump has a 25 to 30% of mouth breathers that helped to keep the
election close. Our "liberal media" never talks about all the states that Hillary won in the exit
polls but lost in the vote count and I might be wrong but those were states were voters were
flipped, voters were kept from voting or having their votes counted.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #73)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 02:57 PM

74. They preload the narrative to make their cheating...

...seem plausible. 2000, 2004, 2016. It would have happened to Obama if he had won by big margins. And on it goes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #73)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 03:11 PM

77. He won by 80K voters in the rust belt. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doremus (Reply #77)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 03:27 PM

82. And 200,000 voters were removed in Wisconsin, 80,000 voters in the Flint/Detroit area showed up ....

.... and voted but skipped voting for President, and Russia had a huge effort in PA.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #73)

Wed Oct 9, 2019, 03:59 AM

99. Exactly. If you remember, at the end of the night, those states were initially in the Clinton

won category, but they all of a sudden flipped over to Trump. This has happened so many times starting with Bush when JEB! Brought home Florida for his brother and stole it from Gore. Back to the present day, Andrew Gillum and Stacey Abrams won their states, but it was switched at the end just enough to win, but not enough to trigger an automatic recount. They can’t win without cheating.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:25 AM

9. Again, I do not trust these Republicans . . .

Nevertheless, this is a "good" sign.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Iliyah (Reply #9)

Wed Oct 9, 2019, 07:36 AM

101. I agree. This is a full blown conspiracy to obstruct justice.

At the very least I hope that the Democrats drag it into the sunlight and make it obvious:what a pack of criminsls the GOP is every chance that they can.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:25 AM

10. I believe you

but I can't find any mention of it in news sources...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bettie (Reply #10)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:34 AM

20. Heard it on Miami Local 10 at noon from their DC reporter - looking for a link

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #20)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:40 AM

24. OK.

Just haven't been able to find it online yet.

Makes you wonder how much more shit is about to hit the fan if they are willing to put that out there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #20)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:35 PM

45. I'm having trouble finding a link. And this sort of says the opposite.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:25 AM

11. The End is in sight.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:25 AM

12. Enfin!

Formidable!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:25 AM

13. The House Dems really need to see the Grand Jury materials, but there's a Nixon angle



Matthew Miller ✔ @matthewamiller

Huh. I did not see the “Nixon was treated unfairly” argument coming.

Spencer Hsu ✔ @hsu_spencer

DEVELOPING Trump Justice Dept. asks U.S. judge to reject House Judiciary Committee request for Mueller grand jury materials, argues courts in 1974 wrongly gave Congress the Watergate grand jury 'roadmap' that led to President Nixon's impeachment.


12:20 PM - Oct 8, 2019

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dennis Donovan (Reply #13)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:31 AM

16. They can ask,

but they won't get.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dennis Donovan (Reply #13)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:44 AM

28. I really like Matt Miller

I hope he'll keep showing up on TV after this is all over.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dennis Donovan (Reply #13)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:11 PM

41. Wow, talk about a slap in the face to the current SC! Heck, even 1-2 conservatives may vote....

against these blockheads just to make a point.

Geez, they and Trumpy have pissed off every single judicial, Congressional and investigative agency that exists. The NSA, CIA, FBI and all the careerist Fed'l employees at State, Education, HUD, NEA and more must be mighty pissed at the OrangeFueher. These are the folks that will do him in with scores more whistleblowers yet to come forth.

I say............GO TEAM!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:27 AM

14. Glad they're doing it,

and only thing I'd like as well as trump out of White House (and imprisoned) will be barr disbarred and imprisoned.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elleng (Reply #14)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:33 AM

17. I want many more things, actually

Those two are my starters but I want the bus to be fully stalled because of the coverup in process.

It's not the crime, it's the coverup. Wait, no, it's both.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tavalon (Reply #17)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:33 AM

19. Yes it's both.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tavalon (Reply #17)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:04 PM

38. Our rallying cry?:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tavalon (Reply #17)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 03:58 PM

86. Me too.

McConnell is at the top of my list. Also (besides Trump and Barr) Giuliani, Nunes, Ron Johnson, Jim Jordan, and I'm sure there are others. Every one needs to be investigated and prosecuted if they broke the law. And at the very least, they all need to be kicked out of office, disbarred, and publicly shamed.

I'm not bitter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elleng (Reply #14)

Wed Oct 9, 2019, 04:46 AM

100. And Kavanaugh impeached and getting to the bottom of the Kennedy buy out

Of his SCJ seat and security for his son. We need to know who paid off Kavanaugh’s credit card debt.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:30 AM

15. I hope they didn't offer a quid pro quo

Yes, I really, really did that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tavalon (Reply #15)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:36 AM

21. Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah

I see what you did there

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:40 AM

23. Where are you seeing this?

I don't see it on CNN, MSN, or Twitter...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to W_HAMILTON (Reply #23)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:41 AM

25. Heard it on Local 10 Miami

I too am looking for a link

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #25)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 03:37 PM

83. You'd think that after four (4) hours, the OP would have admitted to a mistake. . . . nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:43 AM

27. Barr must have shat his pants I guess. No deals for him I hope.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:44 AM

29. Forsooth!

Egads! 'Tis all in the getting. For will the scoundrels hand their soiled sheets to an interlocutor, or clutch them firmly to their greasy breasts, bemoaning the sheer meanness of such calls to justice? What getting can there be from vipers in a moot?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:47 AM

31. Yes, because courts love to hear that they were wrong. That will really help them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:55 AM

35. There's nothing in it that hasn't been seen

Don't get excited.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to superpatriotman (Reply #35)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:02 PM

37. Tend to agree. We get excited about every new bombshell, then it fizzles.

 

The Ukraine shakedown, on the other hand, has legs and doesn’t require connecting hundreds of dots. And trump just keeps digging himself deeper.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:56 AM

36. Source?

 

Are you sure you're not thinking about the grand jury materials?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to StarfishSaver (Reply #36)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:17 PM

44. That is the main Mueller info that the Democrats are after this morning.

 

The DOJ is in possession of it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:07 PM

39. Barr may yet up serving time like Mitchell

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:10 PM

40. The pending DC bar complaint may have had an impact

Barr is too corrupt to have a law license.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlk (Reply #40)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 02:03 PM

69. 2 complaints now!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to True Blue American (Reply #69)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 02:25 PM

72. Even better!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:15 PM

42. That's a bit of fresh air this morning...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:15 PM

43. This mornings negotiations have been interesting to watch.

 

The DOJ sees how it is going in court. First they offered thirty requested documents but that they would be redacted. Now they are offering to hand over more, underacted. It must have looked really bad for them in the court room this morning.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TidalWave46 (Reply #43)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:40 PM

48. When your only argument

Is that the previous court was wrong, you know how its all going to turn out.

Sounds like the judge is embarrassed for the DOJ attorneys because he knows they have been "forced" to go to the court and make an argument that a first year law student knows is a losing one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:36 PM

46. This is the "aiding and abetting" evidence for a Treason charge.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:44 PM

49. Maybe you misheard?

AFAIK the House wants the Mueller report turned over but the DOJ is trying to block the release of it.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/08/justice-department-objects-to-house-getting-mueller-grand-jury-info.html

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to blogslut (Reply #49)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:52 PM

51. Yes. That seems to be the case.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hlthe2b (Reply #51)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 04:32 PM

91. THAT is their argument????

Does drumpf actually have lawyers or just kids playing MAD-LIBs to come up with ideas???

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:52 PM

50. How do we know it's unredacted? Do we have Barr's word?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:53 PM

52. I will never believe this until after it is done and Schiff confirms it.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:54 PM

53. How will we know

That it is legitimately Muellers' report? So much corruption. Will Mueller verify it? Nothing can be taken at face value at this point.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Peace06 (Reply #53)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 01:00 PM

55. first thing that popped into my head

"trust but verify" Saint Ronnie the Republican once said. Seems like a very good idea in this case, but how to verify?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:57 PM

54. U.S. Chief District Judge Howell's ruling predicted to go against Trump and the DOJ

on the Congressional subpeona for the Mueller report grand jury materials.

Any actually truly classified material (as opposed to GOP-classified so as not to embarass Herr Marmalade) will only be seen by the House Select Committee I would assume.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 01:01 PM

56. When I saw the first part of your headline I was afraid it was "to the Senate Committee"....

....which would be meaningless.

The HOUSE Committee is big. This is going to be good.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 01:02 PM

57. Barr is not afraid of anything except failing to own the libs

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 01:08 PM

59. Is this to get them to focus their energy on the Mueller report and slow the I.I?

Fuck the Mueller report. Full steam ahead. We'll go over that material some other time.

We've got him nailed on abuse of power, obstruction of justice and conspiracy to conceal a crime...along with a laundry list of other crimes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 01:13 PM

61. Barr gave Trump bad legal advice and owes him an explanation. Should be exciting

when Trump realizes how deep the "deep state" (Constitution and Federal Courts) is and what his embarrassment will be.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NCjack (Reply #61)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 02:05 PM

70. Trump sounds like a 2 year old,

Caught doing something bad, trying to lie his way out of it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 01:19 PM

62. Or is it that Mitch

...gave Barr the go-ahead, based on the pro-impeachment polls rising? So he wants to force Trump to resign now, ahead of the elections. Thinking Repugs will do better under the banner of Pence and "re-electing" him in Nov than a crazy, uncontrollable Trump.

See what I mean?

Mitch hates Trump and is worried about Trump's ability to tear-down all of them. May be thinking he'll salvage what he can and that it's become time to short circuit this daily drip-drip.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 01:24 PM

63. I hope the chairman remembers to check for sharpie edits

fortunately they do have a distinct odor

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 01:39 PM

67. Why??

So they can say that they have been cooperative and there isn't anything else they should turn over?

Probably?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 01:58 PM

68. I wish Barr feared Mitchell's fate.

I believe Barr’s actions to this point have far outstripped Mitchell’s misdeeds.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 02:06 PM

71. YES!!!

Finally! I hope at some point the complete report will be available to anyone/everyone.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 03:14 PM

78. Link, somebody? I'm not finding any link to this story on news search engine.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 03:20 PM

80. If it wasn't you posting I'd think it was a spoof

Rec'd!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 03:26 PM

81. This has been up for hours now without a source. Is this accurate or not? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Guy Whitey Corngood (Reply #81)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 03:45 PM

85. Not sure but the judge has made some interesting comments n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #85)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 04:16 PM

88. Ok, but the OP is not accurate then? Because as of right now they're not handing these out. Am I

missing something here?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Guy Whitey Corngood (Reply #88)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 04:21 PM

90. Until I find a link you are right but there is this

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #90)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 05:14 PM

92. Thx. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 03:44 PM

84. I wasted my time reading this entire thread...

...about something that never happened.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 40RatRod (Reply #84)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 06:00 PM

93. I like to think it happened, so I enjoyed it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 40RatRod (Reply #84)

Wed Oct 9, 2019, 10:29 AM

102. Yes!

Me too - wasted all this time reading through comments and googling story - this is fake news - ugh.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 04:11 PM

87. I'll believe it when I see it n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 06:12 PM

94. He'll end up like Mitchell anyway

He’s in this shit show waaaay too deep.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 07:28 PM

95. Please hand it over to the NYTimes and Washington Post.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Wed Oct 9, 2019, 01:36 AM

96. i heard that on hartmann's show tuesday

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Wed Oct 9, 2019, 01:44 AM

97. I like how skeptical many of you are. That gives me hope... for the future...

"WHERE'S THE SOURCE LINK?! WHERE IS IT!!"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Wed Oct 9, 2019, 02:01 AM

98. OP is premature speculation since Judge Howell has not yet ruled on Congress' request

At the hearing yesterday the DOJ argued against releasing the unredacted report. Judge who is an an Obama appointee seemed skeptical of DOJ's argument and may rule for release, but DOJ will probably try to stonewall and appeal even if Judge Howell orders release to Congress.

"Justice Department asks judge to block House from getting Mueller grand jury materials, says Watergate decision was wrong"

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/08/justice-department-objects-to-house-getting-mueller-grand-jury-info.html

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Wed Oct 9, 2019, 10:43 AM

103. Where is a link?

I've been looking for one and can't find any. Is this for real?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread