General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHA! HA! HA! Guess which major candidate didn't file a delegate slate in New Hampshire?
This discussion thread was locked by Skinner (a host of the General Discussion forum).
Romney?
Gingrinch??
Santorum???
No, he isn't a Repuke.
It's the same genius who didn't think that the debt ceiling could bite him in the ass:
by Frank London · January 5, 2012
OOPS! OBAMA CAMPAIGN FAILS TO FILE SLATE OF DELEGATES FOR NEW HAMPSHIRE PRIMARY
For obvious reasons, most news coverage of the 2012 New Hampshire presidential primaries focuses on the Republican contest. With rare exceptions, incumbent presidents seeking re-election enjoy a nearly insuperable advantage in their partys nomination process.
So its business as usual in the Granite State, with only one candidate in the Democratic running. Or maybe not quite so usual because that one candidate isnt President Barack Obama.
Wait what?
Section 655:51 of the New Hampshire Election Code required candidates for their partys presidential nomination to submit slates of national convention delegates to the Secretary of State no later than November 18th, 2011. Only two Democrats did so, and one Aldous C. Tyler has since dropped out and endorsed the other, author and political historian Darcy Richardson.
At first blush, that means Obama appears to have surrendered New Hampshires national convention votes for his re-nomination.
Unlike the incumbent Democrat, fifteen of the thirty candidates running in New Hampshires crowded Republican primary on Tuesday, including all of the major GOP candidates, filed full or nearly complete slates of delegates and alternate delegates.
Im sure this was merely an oversight by President Obamas re-election team, says Richardson. Like a bloated bureaucracy, in a billion-dollar campaign like President Obamas one thats literally drenched in Wall Street money its easy to imagine that the left hand doesnt always know what the right hand is doing.
Not that hes complaining, mind you. Richardson, 56, of Jacksonville, Florida, launched his anti-war, anti-Wall-Street, pro-Occupy campaign last fall after his pleas to more well-known progressives to run former Labor Secretary Robert Reich topped his list fell on deaf ears.
The President has very obviously forgotten what the Democratic Party stands for, he says. So I cant say Im really surprised that he forgot he needs the help of real flesh-and-blood Democrats to get re-elected as well. I havent.
Richardson is on the Democratic primary ballot in several other states, including Missouri, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Texas and will be launching a petition drive for a spot on the Wisconsin ballot tomorrow. Im happy to take all the delegates he wants to leave on the table, says the long-shot challenger. Well be waiting to have a talk with him when he gets to Charlotte next September.
http://www.battlegroundblog.com/2012/01/05/exclusive-obama-campaign-fails-to-file-delegate-slate-for-new-hampshire-primary/
So, without any delegates for Obama, we will again see a repeat of 1968 when challenger Sen. Eugene McCarthy beat the sitting Democratic President in delegates earned from the New Hampshire primary!!
FarLeftFist
(6,161 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)We know Darcy can do it!
Two PERCENT!
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)I'm not saying they'll reach it!
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)?
Hart2008
(2,350 posts)FDR didn't bail out failing banks.
Hoover did that kind of stuff.
FDR nationalized them.
Response to Hart2008 (Reply #19)
Post removed
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)Don't be a wingnut (right-wing or extreme-fringe).
Democratic Underground is an online community for politically liberal people who understand the importance of working within the system to elect more Democrats and fewer Republicans to all levels of political office. Teabaggers, Neo-cons, Dittoheads, Paulites, Freepers, Birthers, and right-wingers in general are not welcome here. Neither are certain extreme-fringe left-wingers, including advocates of violent political/social change, hard-line communists, terrorist-apologists, America-haters, kooks, crackpots, LaRouchies, and the like.
Vote for Democrats.
Winning elections is important therefore, advocating in favor of Republican nominees or in favor of third-party spoiler candidates that could split the vote and throw an election to our conservative opponents is never permitted on Democratic Underground. But that does not mean that DU members are required to always be completely supportive of Democrats. During the ups-and-downs of politics and policy-making, it is perfectly normal to have mixed feelings about the Democratic officials we worked hard to help elect. When we are not in the heat of election season, members are permitted to post strong criticism or disappointment with our Democratic elected officials, or to express ambivalence about voting for them. In Democratic primaries, members may support whomever they choose. But when general election season begins, DU members must support Democratic nominees (EXCEPT in rare cases where were a non-Democrat is most likely to defeat the conservative alternative, or where there is no possibility of splitting the liberal vote and inadvertently throwing the election to the conservative alternative). For presidential contests, election season begins when both major-party nominees become clear. For non-presidential contests, election season begins on Labor Day. Everyone here on DU needs to work together to elect more Democrats and fewer Republicans to all levels of American government. If you are bashing, trashing, undermining, or depressing turnout for our candidates during election season, we'll assume you are rooting for the other side.
FarLeftFist
(6,161 posts)girl gone mad
(20,634 posts)Then gifted trillions more to them once in office.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)The Banking holiday was NOT nationalization, though some banksters might have wished he did...
Whisp
(24,096 posts)*horks
Hart2008
(2,350 posts)SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Darcy Richardson will NOT get the New Hampshire delegates - Darcy is delusional.
Kdillard
(3,887 posts)doesn't mean anything.
dsc
(53,397 posts)in many states you have to actually vote for the delegates (Illinois for instance). When I lived in Illinois I voted for Simon in the primary but I voted for one of Jackson's delegates since I actually knew him. If NH works that way then Obama actually won't get any delegates.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)NH has already sent out sample ballots and he is ON it. Now he might not get any delegates from NH but that is not the end of the world because he won't need them all. Obama will be running unopposed in the majority of the states so he will have more than enough to win the 'nomination'.
dsc
(53,397 posts)but if the ballot is a beauty contest and he has no delegates for whom to vote, then he won't get delegates. I admit I have no idea what happens if it isn't a beauty contest and he has no slate of delegates.
blogslut
(39,167 posts)Gary Hart isn't going to president.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Guess which genius challenged the press to follow him around, then went on a boat called the Monkey Business and posed for photos with his mistress?
Would that be
Obama?
Romney?
Santorum?
Or...genius Gary Hart.
I don't think the President should take primary advice from Gary Hart, or his supporters.
FSogol
(47,623 posts)Don't blame Gary Hart for the Darcy Crackpot. Haven't checked, but I'm sure Hart is squarely behind Obama.
cry baby
(6,876 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Response to Tx4obama (Reply #9)
Post removed
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)The democratic PRIMARY is not going to be a 'close election'.
Please do some research and study the differences between a primary and a general election.
President Obama will win the PRIMARY by a landslide, there is no other viable candidate.
If ya want to make fun of someone then why not make fun of Darcy for not being in the Iowa caucus? Eh?
Obama run unopposed in Iowa and won all the delegates in Iowa.
Have a great year, you're gonna need it.
Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)Obama wins nomination! Now on with the game.
MjolnirTime
(1,800 posts)Or are you so foolish as to believe that Obama won't be nominated?
Cerridwen
(13,262 posts)play with you a bit before I decide to get really ugly.
Well, I obviously didn't choose hide or ignore...hmmmm, play or ugly? Play or ugly?
Cerridwen
(13,262 posts)I'll just sit back and enjoy the show.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)¬snip¬
The Democratic ballot is considerably shorter than the Republican ballot, but Democratic voters in New Hampshire wishing to take part in Tuesdays primary do have a list of 13 names to check off aside from Barack Obama. The listed individuals span the ideological spectrum. Some are to the left of Obama, such as Darcy G. Richardson of Jacksonville, Fla., who bills himself as a progressive Democrat on his webpage and is running because hes been disappointed by President Obamas abandonment of many of the progressive values that he articulated so eloquently.
Others are to the presidents right, like Robert B. Jordan of Garden Grove, Calif., who is running on an oil platform which proposes lifting all restrictions on drilling in U.S. oil reserves, including the ANWAR and Prudhoe Bay regions in Alaska.
Qualifying for ballot access in New Hampshire is a relatively straightforward process. Candidates wishing to file for the first in the nation primary are required to submit a declaration of candidacy to the secretary of states office, along with a $1,000 filing fee. New Hampshires filing deadline was Oct. 28, 2011.
greatauntoftriplets
(179,008 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(106,212 posts)http://www.sos.nh.gov/655-web2011.pdf
And 655:50 (not 51) says it's the 3rd Friday following the close of nominations - and the close was the 3rd Friday of November. Which shows that Darcy Richardson's blog is no better at reading the detailed rules than they claim the Obama campaign is.
At most, this would mean Obama NH delegates won't get to cast a vote at the convention.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)http://www.boston.com/Boston/politicalintelligence/2011/10/joe-biden-heading-file-for-president-obama-reelection-campaign/pHexVzOHavmpY8t7AddxTK/index.html
muriel_volestrangler
(106,212 posts)which does show only Richardson and Tyler with lists of delegates. Well, I say 'list' - Richardson's is 1 delegate and 1 alternate - who appear to be husband and wife, and are also the 2 alternate delegates listed for Tyler. So it doesn't look like there are going to be many committed delegates from NH, I'd guess.
http://www.sos.nh.gov/presprim2012/Delegates%202012.htm
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)really think this is a non-issue.
Hart2008
(2,350 posts)maddezmom
(135,060 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)I understand even less why it's apparently so hilarious.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)this didn't happen:
V.P. Biden Travels to New Hampshire to File Campaign Paperwork
http://www.c-span.org/Events/VP-Biden-Travels-to-New-Hampshire-to-File-Campaign-Paperwork/10737424962/
Shoot...miss!
greatauntoftriplets
(179,008 posts)Now who's laughing?
Hart2008
(2,350 posts)Hart2008
(2,350 posts)Nothing there states that the delegate slate was filed as required by New Hampshire law.
Looks like they just ASSumed that there wouldn't be a challenger.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)Hart2008
(2,350 posts)maddezmom
(135,060 posts)So, without any delegates for Obama, we will again see a repeat of 1968 when challenger Sen. Eugene McCarthy beat the sitting Democratic President in delegates earned from the New Hampshire primary!!
"So you want to blame this on MBNA Joe?"
...the old head fake doesn't work.
Obviously, the OP is the result of an amateur act resorting to distortion.
Foul!
Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)with the facts. For some reason, it gets them even more confused ...
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Hart2008
(2,350 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Prima Facia, it means" delusional.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,212 posts)because his list was 1 delegate (and 1 alternate) long.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)great white snark
(2,646 posts)Obama/Biden four more years.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)perhaps getting all your "news" from useless sources and failing basic civics isn't the best course.
I mean shit dude at least do a basic search before you spew moronic shit all over the rest of us.
toddwv
(2,831 posts)weird.
Hart2008
(2,350 posts)sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Stuff
Oh, and no. You won't see a repeat of 1968, the year Nixon took office. Why exactly are you so happy about that possibility anyways?
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)Obama is on the Ballot and the correct paperwork was filed.
Somewhere overhead I hear a balloon deflating.
Hart2008
(2,350 posts)I think the noise that you heard was that you sat on whoopee cushion...
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)Maybe before you decide to laff it up, get all warm and fuzzy inside and Yell "FIRE!", you should check your facts.
Hart2008
(2,350 posts)Grandmom ate an orange every day and lived to a ripe old age.
Oranges are very important for good health.
Apples taste much better in pies.
They are different.
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)at your Imaginary "Obama Lost the election" New Years 2012 party.
Oh hey that's after Christmas too. I bet you can find some of those Apples/Oranges/Nuts bags on sale. Hey since it's all imaginary, you can supply the nuts, I'm sure.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,212 posts)http://libertycontrol.net/uploads/NHDP/NHDP2012DelegateSelectionPlan.pdf
Deadline for standing: 5pm, January 6th, 2012. Selected by 2 post-primary caucuses on Jan 14th. This would seem to make any list given to the Secretary of State irrelevant.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Your information is FALSE...
DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES
Monday, October 17, 2011 no filings
Tuesday, October 18, 2011 no filings
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 no filings
Thursday, October 20, 2011
Barack Obama, Chicago, IL (PO Box 8102, Chicago, IL 60680) filed by VP Biden counsel@barackobama.com
Friday, October 21, 2011
Darcy G. Richardson, Jacksonville, FL (7810 Fox Tail Lane, Jacksonville, FL 32219)--- filed by mail
darcyrichardson@comcast.net
...
http://www.sos.nh.gov/Candidates.pdf
Hart2008
(2,350 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Bananas?
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)There's Darcy's entire platform right there.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Hart2008
(2,350 posts)rurallib
(64,688 posts)go post at freeperville
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)for you, for posting this crap. HA HA HA!
muriel_volestrangler
(106,212 posts)delegates on January 14th, 2012. Delegate Candidates shall be listed in alphabetical
order on a printed ballot; the starting letter shall be drawn by the State Party Chair.
Each person voting at a district level post-primary caucus shall sign a statement
certifying that (i) the person will be qualified to vote in the November 6, 2012
General Election and (ii) the person supports the presidential candidate whose district
level delegates are being chosen at the caucus.
...
An individual can qualify as a candidate for district-level delegate to the 2012
Democratic National Convention by filing a statement of candidacy designating
his or her presidential (or uncommitted) preference and a signed pledge of
support for the presidential candidate (including uncommitted status) with the
State Party by January 6, 2012 at 105 N. State St., Concord, New Hampshire.
(Rules 12.B & 14.F.)
...
Presidential Primary - Proportional Representation Plan (Rules 13.A., 13.B. & 13.D.) The New
Hampshire presidential primary election is a "binding" primary. Accordingly, delegate
positions shall be allocated so as to fairly reflect the expressed presidential (or
uncommitted) preference of the primary voters in each district. The National
Convention delegates selected at the district level shall be allocated in proportion to
the percentage of the primary vote won in that district by each preference, except that
preferences falling below a 15% threshold shall not be awarded any delegates.
http://libertycontrol.net/uploads/NHDP/NHDP2012DelegateSelectionPlan.pdf
So it looks like the Democratic delegates aren't selected through the direct NH process anyway. This may explain why, in 2008, the Secretary of State listed the Republican delegates, but not the Democratic ones: http://www.sos.nh.gov/presprim2008/
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)hootinholler
(26,451 posts)neverforget
(9,513 posts)SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)

grantcart
(53,061 posts)The analogy peaks at 2:10
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)Matt Lauer "Can Suck it" !
UTUSN
(77,795 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)click on that person's recent recommendations.
go get a towel.
clean your keyboard.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)Response to Hart2008 (Original post)
Post removed
struggle4progress
(126,158 posts)SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Sid
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)PRESIDENT OBAMA

SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)Of all the inane comments in this thread and elsewhere tonight that should have left my mouth hanging open in shock, yours did the trick.
YOWZA
(not that yours is inane mind you, lol)
Rex
(65,616 posts)Obama decided he did not have to do much...the GOPers will win the election for him.
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)for Darcy Richardson.
eta:
Evidently he's playing by Republican rules. How awesome is that?
Candidates are supposed to file 20 delegates and 20 alternate delegates, but few candidates filled out the entire slate. The slates are required by national Republican Party rules.
http://www.unionleader.com/article/20111202/NEWS0605/712029961
Priceless.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)
That is extremely awesome! 
