General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHistorians demolish John Yoo for claim Founding Fathers wouldn't want Trump impeached in an election
Published 3 mins ago
on October 17, 2019
By Tom Boggioni
Comments made by attorney and law professor John Yoo on Fox News on the Founding Fathers intentions about impeachment received a brutal debunking by two historians including one of his colleagues at UC Berkeley.
Appearing with Fox News personality Laura Ingraham, lawyer Yoo who is infamous for providing President George W. Bushs administration with legal justifications for the torture of prisoners of war claimed that the Founding Fathers would object to the president being impeached in an election year.
According to Yoo, Democrats are getting it all wrong when they say the Constitution compels them to hold impeachment proceedings against Trump just one year before the election.
Im glad theyre reading the Constitution and citing the framers for once but theyve got it exactly backwards, Yoo asserted. What the framers thought was the American people would judge a president at the time of an election, they would have never wanted an impeachment within a year of an election, its up to the American people.
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/historians-demolish-john-yoo-for-claim-founding-fathers-wouldnt-want-trump-impeached-in-an-election-year/
How does this "guy" have job teaching.............................and teaching Federalist Society...................... BS
dalton99a
(81,486 posts)He is full of shit
Goodheart
(5,324 posts)He has no historical support, whatsoever, for that bullshit.
spanone
(135,831 posts)After he left the Department of Justice, it was revealed that Yoo had written legal opinions, including co-writing the Torture Memo of August 1, 2002, that narrowly defined torture and American habeas corpus obligations. They authorized what were called enhanced interrogation techniques and were issued to the CIA.[26][27][28] In addition, at the time the OLC issued a new definition of torture. Most actions that fall under the international definition did not fall within this new definition advocated by the U.S.[29]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Yoo
Sounds like Mitch McConnell justifying why Merrick Garland didn't get a vote for SCOTUS.
malaise
(268,997 posts)Fuck Yoo!
spanone
(135,831 posts)turbinetree
(24,695 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,457 posts)I thought that was what conservatives demand of all judges. Secondly, he needs to check out impeachment date for Andrew Johnson.....1868, an election year.
2naSalit
(86,608 posts)Vonnegut would say, "Go take a flying fuck at a rolling doughnut!"
Kid Berwyn
(14,904 posts)...can be counted on to say anything for money.