Here's why Sondland's testimony is devastating to Trump -- whether he wants it to be or not

[turbinetree]

Published 1 min ago
on October 17, 2019

By Sarah K. Burris

Veteran Newsweek reporter Kurt Eichenwald outlined in a thread that EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland delivered testimony to the House that was devastating for President Donald Trump whether Sondland wanted it to be or not.

“While wrapped in diplomatic-speak and hemming-and-hawing, the statement of Gordon Sondland, U.S. ambassador to European Union, is devastating to Trump and Giuliani,” Eichenwald said. “Given the surrounding evidence, either Giuliani has to say he lied to Sondland, or Trump has to be impeached it is important to dig through it, because, while quite clear on most dates, it takes jumping a bit around in the statement to figure out the date of the key event.”

He outlined a timeline of Sondland’s involvement in the Ukraine scandal:

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/heres-why-sondlands-testimony-is-devastating-to-trump-whether-he-wants-it-to-be-or-not/

In my opinion he broke the law and was aiding and abetting in this act of treason against the Constitution..................LOCK HIS ASS UP.....................................

[empedocles]

1. Good news

[at140]

2. Don't I wish chairman Schiff had the power to

Lock up the asshole occupying white house?

[Shrike47]

3. If you follow the link and read the chronology, it's pretty damned clear what Trump was demanding.

To me, the interesting part was that the Burisma corruption question really has nothing to do with Burisma per se, it has to do with alleged corruption by the CEO when he was a government official. I want to know about that.