Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,738 posts)
Fri Oct 18, 2019, 07:44 AM Oct 2019

Fox's Judge Napolitano: G7 at Trump Doral Is as 'Profound a Violation' as 'One Could Create'

Daily Beast

During Thursday’s broadcast of Fox Business Network’s Cavuto: Coast to Coast, eponymous host Neil Cavuto noted that the announcement of the G7 location “is effectively saying the president has given himself this contract.”

Pointing out that previous summits in the United States took place at Camp David and Sea Island, Cavuto said the White House is arguing that holding the event at the president’s property is not a violation of the emoluments clause.

...snip...

Explaining that this wouldn’t be an issue if this were a meeting of U.S. government officials, Napolitano once again stated that the emoluments clause is to prevent the president from receiving gifts or cash from foreign entities.

“He has bought himself an enormous headache now with the choice of this,” he continued. “This is about as direct and profound a violation of the emoluments clause as one could create.”
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fox's Judge Napolitano: G7 at Trump Doral Is as 'Profound a Violation' as 'One Could Create' (Original Post) brooklynite Oct 2019 OP
Wonder what Napolitano's next job will be. Vinca Oct 2019 #1
yep. faux news viewers are calling and emailing like crazy Demovictory9 Oct 2019 #2
Hey Shep Smith, can I use your job hunting service? Funtatlaguy Oct 2019 #3
Hoping some Deplorable Faux watchers had their non-performing NoMoreRepugs Oct 2019 #4
Oh c'mon, y'all. It's really nice of him. tanyev Oct 2019 #5
He is partly right genxlib Oct 2019 #6
Turd45 is basically saying ... aggiesal Oct 2019 #7

genxlib

(5,542 posts)
6. He is partly right
Fri Oct 18, 2019, 08:35 AM
Oct 2019

Of course this stinks to high heaven. But he is wrong to say it wouldn't be an issue if this were a meeting of US Government officials.

It might not be a violation of the Emoluments Clause but it sure as hell would be an issue.

aggiesal

(8,924 posts)
7. Turd45 is basically saying ...
Fri Oct 18, 2019, 10:50 AM
Oct 2019

I'm doing it.
I dare you to stop me.

This is the Emoluments Clause

The Title of Nobility Clause is a provision in Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution,[1] that prohibits the federal government from granting titles of nobility, and restricts members of the government from receiving gifts, emoluments, offices or titles from foreign states and monarchies without the consent of the United States Congress.


There is also a provision in the emoluments clause that states it's ok if congress consents it.
Good thing the (D)'s are in control otherwise an (R) congress would have consented and
then spit in the (D)'s faces.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fox's Judge Napolitano: G...