General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary Clinton predicts Russia propping up dem 3rd party candidate
Last edited Fri Oct 18, 2019, 11:11 AM - Edit history (1)
Link to tweet
Aaron Blake ✔ @AaronBlake
Hillary Clinton doesn't just predict the Russians will support Tulsi Gabbard as a third-party candidate; she also calls Jill Stein "a Russian asset -- I mean totally."
Full context:
10:10 AM - Oct 18, 2019
On edit: WaPo story:
<snip>
In a conversation on former Obama campaign manager David Plouffes podcast, Clinton suggested the Russians are leveraging a number of top U.S. politicians. She suggested Russia had kompromat on Trump. She accused 2016 Green Party nominee Jill Stein of being a Russian asset. And she suggested Russia might back Gabbard as a third-party candidate.
Theyre also going to do third-party again, Clinton said. Im not making any predictions, but I think theyve got their eye on someone whos currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate. Shes the favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far.
The again referred to Stein, whom some Clinton supporters have accused (rather baselessly) of serving as a spoiler for Clinton in 2016. Stein got around 1 percent of the vote in the three decisive states -- Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin -- but exit polls showed most of her voters wouldnt have supported either Clinton or Trump if Stein werent running.
Clinton then flat-out labeled Stein a Russian asset.
And thats assuming Jill Stein will give it up, which she might not because shes also a Russian asset, Clinton said. Yeah, shes a Russian asset I mean, totally. They know they cant win without a third-party candidate. So I dont know who its going to be, but I will guarantee you they will have a vigorous third-party challenge in the key states that they most needed.
</snip>
Funtatlaguy
(10,870 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)jcgoldie
(11,627 posts)But if trojan horse Gabbard continues to overplay her both sidesist schtick she may end up sapping more votes from republicans than democrats in that scenario... she is the darling of fox news already...
MrsCoffee
(5,801 posts)2naSalit
(86,508 posts)blm
(113,039 posts)I am not dogging any primary Dem candidate. But Gabbard is no Democrat. Shes posing as a Democrat as part of Russias attack against our elections.
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)I'm not saying she's behind it (not bashing a Dem) but is, nonetheless, a willing recipient of the help?
dalton99a
(81,428 posts)RandySF
(58,696 posts)dalton99a
(81,428 posts)comradebillyboy
(10,142 posts)Firestorm49
(4,030 posts)Dont doubt for a minute how vicious, whether overt or covert, the upcoming election will be. The Russians dont need to rig voting machines because that would be too easy to verify, or so we would like to think.. Sowing discord again and or propping up a third party candidate? Perfect. Just enough to divide the votes. In my opinion, the battle plans for our destruction will be even more sophisticated. Combine with that the asset named William Barr who will go to any length to soften our security apparatuses, the current asset in the Oval Office doing whatever he can to keep his sordid past secret at the expense of OUR country, and the willingness of Putin to rule the world, and you have the perfect cocktail of demise: all supported by a complicit Republican Party.
This one will be a doozie, and will determine the future of democracy.
global1
(25,239 posts)before the election?
Is she is being groomed by the Russians - she must be in contact with them in some way. Couldn't that be found out and exposed?
kentuck
(111,074 posts)..and very possible.
Gothmog
(145,063 posts)uponit7771
(90,329 posts)... states.
She's right, the Russian's propped 3rd parties last time and they'll do it again.