General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow many times can chuck Rosenberg be fooled ?
I generally appreciate his analysis. He is often on Rachel or other MSNBC shows. Back when Barr was considered for ag he was one of the former justice official telling us that Barr had a very good reputation, he was a straight arrow, etc..
He later had to admit he was wrong. Now, the same song is being heard from him about John Durham, the prosecutor that barr put in charge to investigate the Russian investigation.
I trust John Durham, respect him, etc..
You would think Rosenberg would have realized by now that Trump corrupts everybody.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Some are in denial about or ignorant of Barr's history.
dem4decades
(11,269 posts)Or whatever W said.
How can he be so naive?
drray23
(7,615 posts)In trump's era old rules by which people used to behave no longer apply.
LenaBaby61
(6,972 posts)And he's a very honorable person from all I know about him.
But he's uber-naive beyond belief at times.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,584 posts)I think Rosenberg is a straight arrow who, when he was in the DoJ, worked with other people who seemed to be straight arrows, too. Unfortunately, some of them (like Barr) were either already bad but pretended to be "institutionalists," or who weren't bad but became corrupted by working for Trump (like Rosenstein and maybe Durham). Comey said Trump eats people's souls a bit at a time if they are weak.
I wonder if Barr will try to prosecute Mueller?
Pachamama
(16,884 posts)Exactly
I think Barr (as directed by Trump) plans to try to prosecute Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Mueller.....Hillary Clinton....
I think we haven't even begun to see what Trump's soul eating will produce....
gab13by13
(21,255 posts)why would we think he is an honest broker?
These traitors make me physically sick.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,584 posts)He would have been only in his early 20s at the time of the Iran Contra scandal in the early '80s and didn't get his law degree until 1990. Some of the cases he did handle included the prosecution of Michael Vick for dog-fighting, and Zacharias Moussaoui for his participation in the 9/11 conspiracy, as well as child pornography prosecutions. He was the Chief of Staff to the FBI director during the Obama administration.
DeminPennswoods
(15,265 posts)Honestly, he could sell his delivery style as a sleep aid.
drray23
(7,615 posts)I would expect an old school prosecutor like him would indeed be measured and sober. What bothers me is that he cant seem to be able to see that in the era of Trump, those that work for him are unlikely to be straight arrows.
DeminPennswoods
(15,265 posts)If I was on a jury in a case he was prosecuting, his delivery would annoy the heck out of me.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,584 posts)so many other talking heads get into. He's measured and careful and sensible and he knows the law. Those are good things if you ask me.
DeminPennswoods
(15,265 posts)I find Rosenberg cloying, but ymmv.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)knowledge and substance. I'm tired of watching people ranting on television and appreciate listening to thoughtful people discuss issues as if we're intelligent.
DeminPennswoods
(15,265 posts)His delivery annoys me. I hit the mute bottom or change channels whenever he's giving yet another slow, deliberate reponse to whatever he's asked.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)But how would you know if you turn him off before he says anything?
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,584 posts)whether he's saying anything different? In fact, he does. He is one of the best of the talking heads at explaining legal concepts and procedures in a way that can be easily understood by people who aren't lawyers. I'm sorry he isn't wearing a party hat and a clown nose when he does it.
DeminPennswoods
(15,265 posts)I find his "could be this, could be that" talking style highly annoying. It is painful to my ears. I prefer analysts who can make a point succinctly without being verbose.
Firestorm49
(4,029 posts)ritapria
(1,812 posts)They are fulsomely praised as "straights shooters " and turn out to be either corrupt or weak as a feather ...Until proven otherwise , I'm expecting the worst
BigmanPigman
(51,565 posts)I also remembered that attorney Joyce Vance (she is often on Rachel Maddow) said the same thing about Barr. He sure conned a lot of smart people. Maybe they are too close to see the real picture, the objective picture.
Jarqui
(10,122 posts)Don't mean to be a conspiracy theorist but that is what seems to have happened to Lindsey Graham and appears to have happened to AG Barr.
That is what these sinister people do.
To the Ukraine President "Do this dirty deed for us to get $400 mil in defense $ or Vlad Putin gets your country!!"
They're probably looking for people in the intelligence community they can blackmail or bribe to lie.
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)ooky
(8,906 posts)dawg day
(7,947 posts)Maybe that's what he's doing? I wish?
NCLefty
(3,678 posts)not_the_one
(2,227 posts)These Pollyanna politicians who have nothing but respect for someone just tapped by the turd need to buy a clue or phone a friend. The audience ALREADY knows the score of these sycophants.
The ONLY reason the turd would tap ANYONE is because they are "flexible", who will obediently do what they are told to do, regardless of legality. THAT is why he picked them.
Like everyone else has said, repeatedly, everything (and everyone) that the turd touches turns to shit.
triron
(21,984 posts)Pachamama
(16,884 posts)Under your argument, Bill Taylor who was chosen by Mike Pompeo (who was chosen by the Turd) would be shit.
Bill Taylor is not shit.
I think the assumption that because Barr tapped Durham makes him shit is a completely incorrect one.