Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

BlueStater

(7,596 posts) Sun Oct 27, 2019, 07:02 AM Oct 2019

If the military took out the leader of ISIS, they did it spite of the toxic manbaby.

Trump wouldn't know Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi from Kal Penn.

Fuck him and his pathetic efforts to jerk himself off today.

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If the military took out the leader of ISIS, they did it spite of the toxic manbaby. (Original Post) BlueStater Oct 2019 OP

Seeing as Trump wanted the US forces to leave Syria, he is in no position to take credit. Doodley Oct 2019 #1

Presidents don't lead or plan commando missions, they merely approve or disapprove a raid if it braddy Oct 2019 #2

Doodley

(9,092 posts)

1. Seeing as Trump wanted the US forces to leave Syria, he is in no position to take credit.

Reply to BlueStater (Original post)

Sun Oct 27, 2019, 07:05 AM

Oct 2019

But he will say it proves he is better than Obama and the impeachment investigation is unfair.

braddy

(3,585 posts)

2. Presidents don't lead or plan commando missions, they merely approve or disapprove a raid if it

Reply to BlueStater (Original post)

Sun Oct 27, 2019, 07:35 AM

Oct 2019

has political ramifications at a level that would involve them having any input at all. The military gets assigned targets and it takes out the target when the opportunity presents itself, whether that is immediate or months, or years down the road.

Reply to this discussion