Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 10:05 PM Jan 2012

Boeing's free-market move is going to cost Kansas big-time

Boeing's free-market move is going to cost Kansas big-time

Boeing workers in Kansas
So, tired of high taxes? Want to see big federal budget cuts?

Congratulations. You're getting your wish.

And you just cost 2,160 people in Kansas their jobs.

That's because Boeing Co., bracing for cuts in the defense budget over the coming decade, decided that "we're not in Kansas anymore, Toto," announcing Wednesday that it will close its facility in Wichita.

A plant that it's operated just since, oh, the 1920s.


http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla/2012/01/boeing-job-cuts-wichita-defense-cutbacks.html

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
1. I can only assume the plant has been deemed obsolete
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 10:08 PM
Jan 2012

Otherwise, it's a baffling move. With the notable exception of Sebelius, Kansas is solidly red, solidly pro defense, and IIRC, is a right-to-work state.

Kinda biting the hand that feeds you.

bhikkhu

(10,789 posts)
2. Boeing has added several thousand people to its west-coast operations...
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 10:12 PM
Jan 2012

I don't know exactly what's behind the Kansas closure, but they've been expanding for some time (and are still hiring) in Washington - almost all good-paying union jobs.

They did experiment with outsourcing for the 787 ( http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/02/boeings-multi-billion-outsourcing-fiasco.html ), but for at least the last year they've been going back the other way.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
3. but, but, but gov. Brownback says he's the great job creator for KS! That corps. and
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 10:13 PM
Jan 2012

people are going to flock to KS. And meanwhile he endorses his idol Perry. Also, at some point, maybe Brownback will get it that some people also leave KS because they don't like the anti- this and that. ... but I doubt that. I guess more prayer sessions are needed.

rgbecker

(4,890 posts)
4. I get regular right wing emails from an inlaw of my sister's who works at that Boeing plant.
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 11:55 PM
Jan 2012

He may be close to retirement, but I'm interested in hearing what he has to say about that.

 

demtenjeep

(31,997 posts)
5. it is going to hurt us, but it could have been worse
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 12:04 AM
Jan 2012

the majority of Boeing was sold to Spirit a few years ago so we will still have air-craft manufactoring just not the military/Air Force One side.

kurt_cagle

(534 posts)
7. Massively Funny
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 12:10 AM
Jan 2012

Boeing decided several years back to move their corporate headquarters out of Seattle to Chicago, along with plans to move a significant part of their development efforts to more "labor friendly" facilities. If they are in fact moving back to Seattle, I suspect that they've probably found that, among other things, the labor in Seattle is generally much better trained and with more advanced degrees, as well as being unionized.

However, there are also several ironies here. One of the reasons that the defense industry has been so successful is that it has distributed production and development plants in just about every state, even if such plants are relatively tiny, in great part so they can go to Congress and say that any move against them will result in jobs being cut in that representatives state/district. This is the defense industry equivalent to the financials' TBTF strategy. The Republicans attempted to use the hoary tactic of clamoring for reducing the deficit when the Dems are in power, even though typically it is the Republicans that have been most inclined to raise spending without corresponding revenues being derived elsewhere. Obama has called their bluff here, and has forced a situation where mandatory cuts will be made, most heavily in that GOP sacred cow of defense. Given a scaling back and ending of Iraq and Afghanistan, this isn't that surprising, but it is now hitting the defense industry hard. As these companies often tend to heavily back REPUBLICANS, this will in turn serve to reduce the GOP financial base.

EC

(12,287 posts)
8. Didn't Obama just sell a lot of planes?
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 01:38 AM
Jan 2012

I remember several successful trips selling planes. The plant must of been outdated building some of the obsolete or over supplied stuff. Dosen't hurt Obama, hurts the repubs who were on the Super Committee and didn't stop this. Oh, well, sucks to be repub...

Were they union down there? Aren't they a "right to work" state?

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
9. That was a heavy iron defense plant
Reply to EC (Reply #8)
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 10:51 AM
Jan 2012

As in B-52s. Boeing does not have that business anymore

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Boeing's free-market move...