Growing number of GOP senators consider acknowledging Trump's quid pro quo on Ukraine

[IronLionZion]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/growing-number-of-gop-senators-consider-acknowledgingtrumps-quid-pro-quo-on-ukraine/2019/11/01/72084a3e-fcc4-11e9-9534-e0dbcc9f5683_story.html



A growing number of Senate Republicans are ready to acknowledge that President Trump used U.S. military aid as leverage to force Ukraine to investigate former vice president Joe Biden and his family as the president repeatedly denies a quid pro quo.

In this shift in strategy to defend Trump, these Republicans are insisting that the president’s action was not illegal and does not rise to the level of an impeachable offense as the Democratic-led House moves forward with the open phase of its probe.

But the shift among Senate Republicans could complicate the message coming from Trump as he furiously fights the claim that he had withheld U.S. aid from Ukraine to pressure it to dig up dirt on a political rival, even as an increasing number of Republicans wonder how long they can continue to argue that no quid pro quo was at play in the matter.

The pivot was the main topic during a private Senate GOP lunch on Wednesday, according to multiple people familiar with the session who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the meeting. Sen. John Neely Kennedy (R-La.) argued that there may have been a quid pro quo but said that the U.S. government often attaches conditions to foreign aid and that nothing was amiss in Trump’s doing so in the case of aid to Ukraine, these individuals said.

Inside the lunch, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), who ran against Trump in 2016, said a quid pro quo is not illegal unless there is “corrupt intent” and echoed Kennedy’s argument that such conditions are a tool of foreign policy.

These people are so slimy it won't be long until they slip up. We need to put pressure on the ones facing tough reelections in swing states.

[50 Shades Of Blue]

1. I can hear Chuck Toad now...

"Come on now, Chairman Schiff, we can all acknowledge that blackmailing a foreign country into manufacturing dirt on your political opponent and his son isn't exactly something a Boy Scout would do, but what exactly makes it impeachment worthy?"

[RockRaven]

2. They can only argue the facts for so long -- eventually the truth gets out. Then they argue that

yeah it happened but it is no big deal (even though just yesterday they were swearing up and down it didn't happen). They have done this COUNTLESS times before with other instances of Trump malfeasance. It is down-right predictable.

[rzemanfl]

3. So can he pressure Mexico to put all of Salma Hayek's relatives in prison until

she turns up in the Lincoln bedroom?

[Dirty Socialist]

4. That's why we must add more charges

Trump’s corruption is SYSTEMATIC. Congress should add on more charges

[central scrutinizer]

5. Ridiculous

"he's only 90% guilty not 100% guilty"

[Skittles]

6. what would they have done if President Obama did the same

FUCKING HYPOCRITES