Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(24,688 posts)
Tue Nov 5, 2019, 12:23 AM Nov 2019

David Cay Johnston details what prosecutors will do when they get the president's tax returns

Published 2 hours ago
on November 4, 2019

By Matthew Chapman

On Monday, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals rejected President Donald Trump’s claim that he was immune from all criminal investigation as president, allowing New York State prosecutors to obtain several years’ worth of his tax returns.

On CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360,” Pulitzer Prize-winning Trump biographer David Cay Johnston walked through what the prosecutors will likely do with the information they obtain.

“David, if this decision stands, you say that President Trump could have a serious problem once a Manhattan grand jury gets the tax documents,” said Cooper. “What do you believe that they could show?”

“Well, Donald lost two income tax fraud trials,” said Johnston. “And in one of those trials, the tax return introduced in the case was shown to his long-time now-retired tax preparer, Jack Mitnick, who testified that that was his signature on the document, but he did not prepare that tax return. Donald has a long history of filing inconsistent documents with different government agencies. [Manhattan DA] Cy Vance’s grand jury has access to the New York State Tax Authority records. And I suspect they’re going to compare them to the Mazars records to see if Trump altered the tax returns he filed, which would be fraud, in all likelihood.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/david-cay-johnston-details-what-prosecutors-will-do-when-they-get-the-presidents-tax-returns/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
David Cay Johnston details what prosecutors will do when they get the president's tax returns (Original Post) turbinetree Nov 2019 OP
"IF this decision stands..." regnaD kciN Nov 2019 #1
RGB is the Justice assigned to the 2nd District appeals crazytown Nov 2019 #6
Fine. rsdsharp Nov 2019 #11
Al Capone all over again. emmaverybo Nov 2019 #2
Including the untreated syphilis Brother Buzz Nov 2019 #7
That would explain alot. dem4decades Nov 2019 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author sop Nov 2019 #3
"...if Trump altered the tax returns he filed..." yonder Nov 2019 #4
Doesn't he have a history moondust Nov 2019 #5
why yes he does have that history NewJeffCT Nov 2019 #12
Make it so! NCLefty Nov 2019 #9
He may have deducted hush money as legal fees Cicada Nov 2019 #10
He has already lost 2 tax fraud trials? What was his Maraya1969 Nov 2019 #13

regnaD kciN

(26,044 posts)
1. "IF this decision stands..."
Tue Nov 5, 2019, 12:55 AM
Nov 2019

With the current SCOTUS, I’d echo Elvis Costello and rate that chance as “Less Than Zero.”

rsdsharp

(9,162 posts)
11. Fine.
Tue Nov 5, 2019, 12:50 PM
Nov 2019

She'll decide whether or not to grant a stay pending a decision by the full court on a petition for cert.

Please, for the love of God, stop implying that Ginsburg is the final say on an appeal from the Second CIRCUIT (the District Court is below the Court of Appeals). She's not. If Trump seeks cert, all nine members of the Supreme Court will consider it. It takes 4 votes of the justices to grant cert (take the appeal). If it's granted, all nine members of the Supreme Court will vote on the ultimate decision.

Response to turbinetree (Original post)

moondust

(19,972 posts)
5. Doesn't he have a history
Tue Nov 5, 2019, 01:55 AM
Nov 2019

of over-valuing his properties when it serves his interest and under-valuing them for tax purposes? He's a known fraud.

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
10. He may have deducted hush money as legal fees
Tue Nov 5, 2019, 05:14 AM
Nov 2019

Paying Stormy Daniels to keep quiet is not related to business so it should not be deducted as a business deduction. Trump may have reimbursed Michael Cohen for payments to Stormy but deducted the reimbursement as a legal fee business deduction. Normally the taxpayer would be required to pay more tax plus penalties and interest. Leona Helmsley was convicted of criminal tax fraud for deducting personal expenses, such as home renovations, crossword magazine subscriptions, thereby improperly reducing her tax liability by one million dollars. It was something like reducing her annual tax from 58 million dollars to 57 million. But for a mere wrongful deduction of $$150,000 or so criminal prosecution would be unusual. The brother of a friend of mine was convicted of a crime for deducting as business cost $300,000 spent renovating a barn but he also cheated the buyer of his business who busted him to the IRS as revenge. The IRS May have taken his overall creepiness into account in deciding to charge him with criminal tax fraud for a mere $300,000 lie. I don’t know what magnitude of lying motivates criminal charges. But I doubt $150,000 normally does.

Maraya1969

(22,474 posts)
13. He has already lost 2 tax fraud trials? What was his
Tue Nov 5, 2019, 03:53 PM
Nov 2019

Punishment? Has he ever paid for any of the wrongs he had done?

I thought most people go to jail for tax fraud

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»David Cay Johnston detail...