Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStone Trial Opens With Information Indicating Donald Trump May Have Lied to Robert Mueller
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/11/stone-trial-opens-with-information-indicating-donald-trump-may-have-lied-to-robert-mueller/Roger Stone is on trial, and the proceedings are bad news for President Donald Trump, with federal prosecutors citing evidence that suggests Trump might have lied to Special Counsel Robert Mueller. And that sort of lying can be a crime.
The trial kicked off on Wednesday at a federal courthouse in Washington, DC, with a bit of a circus atmosphere. The neo-fascist Proud Boys were there, as well as other luminaries of the alt-right, to support Stone, the dirty trickster and conspiracy theorist who has been a Trump adviser since the 1980s. Facing seven felony counts, Stone is charged with lying repeatedly to the House Intelligence Committee, obstructing justice, and witness tampering. But this case goes beyond Stones alleged lies: prosecutors have revealed new information about how Trump tried to benefit from the Russian operation during the 2016 campaign that hacked the Democratic National Committees servers. And they are producing material undercutting Trumps claim to Mueller that he has no recollection of talking to Stone during the campaign about WikiLeaks. This information also presents a new wrinkle in the Trump-Russia scandal: Trump might have thought in 2016 that his campaign, in effect, was colluding with WikiLeaks. Thats because the campaign was communicating with Stone about WikiLeaks plans and intentions and campaign officials (and perhaps Trump) believed Stone was in contact with WikiLeaks.
The evidence in this case will show that Roger Stone lied to the House Intelligence Committee because the truth looked bad, lead prosecutor Aaron Zelinsky said in his opening statement on Wednesday. The truth looked bad for the Trump campaign and the truth looked bad for Donald Trump.
One of the key points Mueller investigated was whether the Trump campaign had interacted with WikiLeaks or Russian intermediaries in 2016 when Moscow was using WikiLeaks for its operation to subvert the US presidential campaign (which was mounted in part to help Trump win). Trump refused to be questioned in person by Mueller and his investigators. Instead, he agreed to answer written questions on a limited number of subjects. Several of the queries Mueller submitted to Trump focused on whether he was ever told Stone had been in touch with WikiLeaks and whether he or anyone associated with his campaign had spoken to Stone about WikiLeaks. In his written response, Trump replied, I do not recall being told during the campaign that Roger Stone or anyone associated with my campaign had discussions with any of the entities named in the question regarding the content or timing of release of hacked emails. He also noted, I do not recall discussing WikiLeaks with [Stone], nor do I recall being aware of Mr. Stone having discussed WikiLeaks with individuals associated with my campaign. And Trump, who has boasted of possessing a prodigious memory, claimed to have no recollection of the specifics of any conversations I had with Mr. Stone between June 1, 2016 and Election Day. The impression Trump provided: as far as he knew, he and his campaign had had nothing to do with Stone and WikiLeaks.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 648 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stone Trial Opens With Information Indicating Donald Trump May Have Lied to Robert Mueller (Original Post)
fleur-de-lisa
Nov 2019
OP
ritapria
(1,812 posts)1. Mueller should have attempted to force Trump to testify
But he did nothing
Vinca
(50,261 posts)2. Mueller was a huge disappointment. I still can't get over him saying it was unConstitutional to
indict a POTUS. That's outright legal malpractice.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)3. +1, I'm not happy with him because of the overt lack of followup. For instance Trump can say to
... Mueller in this case he just didn't remember and that could be a plausible defense vs Mueller having Trump in front of him and trapping Trump in his words about wikileaks.
Also, the lack of followup with Trumps son.
Mueller just wanted to be a functionary, he pulled his switch he was supposed to pull threw out the overtly legally worded report and let Barr misrepresent it for weeks before saying something.