General Discussion

EveHammond13

(2,855 posts) Thu Nov 7, 2019, 05:59 PM Nov 2019

When they say: "Undoing 2016 election!" we say "Protecting 2020 election" nt

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

When they say: "Undoing 2016 election!" we say "Protecting 2020 election" nt (Original Post) EveHammond13 Nov 2019 OP

Not to Mention... The_Counsel Nov 2019 #1

Agree 100%. Unfortunately, the prevailing attitude about "undoing" the 2016 election Atticus Nov 2019 #2

The_Counsel

(1,758 posts)

1. Not to Mention...

Reply to EveHammond13 (Original post)

Thu Nov 7, 2019, 06:10 PM

Nov 2019

...perhaps the 2016 election NEEDS to be undone if it's clear the result was achieved by underhanded (hell...ILLEGAL) means.

This whole concept of letting a crook slide because they happen to have been sworn in as President has got to stop. The goes back to Dubya, Reagan, Nixon and lord knows who else.

Atticus

(15,124 posts)

2. Agree 100%. Unfortunately, the prevailing attitude about "undoing" the 2016 election

Reply to The_Counsel (Reply #1)

Thu Nov 7, 2019, 06:30 PM

Nov 2019

seems to be "We can't do that because it has never been done before."

Reply to this discussion

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.