Juanita Jean-Alex Jones is a Loser. Again.

[Gothmog]

This makes me smile, Juanita Jean's son, Mark, is the lead attorney in one of the lawsuits against Infowars https://juanitajean.com/alex-jones-a-a-loser-again/

Yesterday the Texas Court of Appeals denied Jones’s request to dismiss the case brought by Sandy Hook parents in the Texas courts.

Jones has lost every single motion in all the Sandy Hook cases filed in Texas. He’s been through 7 lawyers, including the loud and temperamental California lawyer who was apparently paid to scream all the Texas law he didn’t know.

Little Bubba sent me a copy of the three judge panel’s decision. Lawyers hanging around here will want to read it because it’s devastating to Jones and his lawyers so it’s a delicious read. It’s also very smart and well researched.

The Court of Appeals judge who wrote the decision is Judge Gisela D. Triana, an amazing jurist and a credit to Texas. Texans take note: she running for the Texas Supreme Court next November.

Here is a link to the opinion https://juanitajean.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/03-18-00603-CV_cv18-603.mem_.pdf

[Brother Buzz]

1. I ALWAYS enjoy when you post Juanita Jean

She's such a kick in the pants to read.

I always knew she was plugged in, but boy howdy, Little Bubba must make her proud.

[Gothmog]

2. Bubba was sworn in as a judge on October 28

It was a very nice ceremony

[Brother Buzz]

3. I thought Bubba died in a semi-tragic Nascar pit stop accident.

[Mc Mike]

4. Love this part:

including the loud and temperamental California lawyer who was apparently paid to scream all the Texas law he didn’t know.!

[Hermit-The-Prog]

5. footnote 3 ...

This is interesting:

In their brief, Appellants have included, in primarily bullet-point form, several pages of objections to various portions of evidence relied on by the parents. Most of these objections are single words or phrases that contain no analysis or citations to legal authority. Appellants do not elaborate on these objections in their reply brief. We review a trial court’s evidentiary rulings for an abuse of discretion. Southwest Energy Prod. Co. v. Berry-Helfand, 491 S.W.3d 699, 727 (Tex. 2016). Assuming that Appellants’ objections were adequately briefed,
we overrule the objections as we understand them as to the affidavits and supplemental affidavits of the parents. We also determine that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the parents to file supplemental affidavits on August 2, particularly in light of Appellants’ two substantial supplements to their motion to dismiss, one filed five days and another filed one day before the hearing and only six and two days before the parents’ affidavits were filed. We do not reach Appellants’ other objections and base our conclusions on the pleadings, portions of affidavits, and exhibits that were not subject
to the objections listed in Appellants’ brief.

It's not often you get to read a judicial, "WTF?"

[Gothmog]

6. I was also amused by this