Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAdam Schiff Gives Republicans 72 Hours To Name Witnesses They Want For Public Hearings
https://crooksandliars.com/2019/11/house-inquiry-gives-republicans-72-hours?utm_source=social&utm_medium=facebook&utm_content=2317111/08/19 9:21am
Adam Schiff Gives Republicans 72 Hours To Name Witnesses They Want For Public Hearings
In a letter issued on Wednesday morning, House Intelligence Committee chair Adam Schiff wrote to unabashed Trump defender Rep. Devin Nunes to make it clear that if the Republicans have any witnesses they want to appear, they had 72 hours to put their names on the list.
By Mark Sumner
Democrats are moving fast on the impeachment inquiryand demanding the same of Republicans. In a letter issued on Wednesday morning, House Intelligence Committee chair Adam Schiff wrote to unabashed Trump defender Rep. Devin Nunes to make it clear that if the Republicans have any witnesses they want to appear, they had 72 hours to put their names on the list. And the clock is ticking.
Schiffs letter makes it clear that Democrats dont intend to call every witness who appeared for a closed-door deposition during the public sessions, but Republicans are free to do so if they wish. However, despite all the complaints that Republicans have made about having exactly the kind of hearings that the rules they set out demanded, and demanding that witnesses appear in public, no one expects them to go through the list of recent witnesses to make sure they all take the stand in front of cameras.
Earlier reporting suggested that Republicans intend to fill the hearings with dozens of witnesses who have no knowledge of any actions connected to the impeachment, but who would repeat conspiracy theories about Hillary Clinton, the DNC, the whistleblower, and others for the purpose of filling both the air time and congressional record with nonsense. However, the rules for the upcoming round of public hearings require witnesses to be named in advance, and the purpose of each witness needs to be justified. So if Nunes wants to have anyone come for noise-making purposes, he has to lay out the who and why. And Schiffs letter indicates that the reason provided needs to address one of the three narrow areas on which inquiry is based.
Did Trump request that Ukraine open an investigation designed to manufacture evidence against a candidate in the 2020 election?
Did Trump, or people working for Trump, apply pressure to Ukraine to advance Trumps political interests?
Did Trump, or people working from Trump, attempt to obstruct the impeachment inquiry?
Did Trump, or people working for Trump, apply pressure to Ukraine to advance Trumps political interests?
Did Trump, or people working from Trump, attempt to obstruct the impeachment inquiry?
If a potential witness can address one of those questions, and Nunes gets their name to Schiff before 11:20 ET on Saturday, Nov. 9, they can join the roster of witnesses to be subpoenaed. And please, put Rudy Giuliani on that list. Or Trump. That really would be a perfect call.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 907 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (22)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Adam Schiff Gives Republicans 72 Hours To Name Witnesses They Want For Public Hearings (Original Post)
babylonsister
Nov 2019
OP
yellowcanine
(35,694 posts)1. Goopers would not be nuts enough to put Giuliani on the list.
Even they are not that dense.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)2. You can squeeze a lot of nonsense into those "narrow" questions
Whomever wrote that piece is not a lawyer. And, in case some nitwit alerts on this post, I should probably make it clear that the point here is about what Nunes and crew could do in order to argue their witlesses should be heard.
"Did Trump request that Ukraine open an investigation designed to manufacture evidence against a candidate in the 2020 election?"
- We have X, Y and Z who will testify that the investigation was not "designed to manufacture evidence" but instead to confirm evidence of (insert crazy conspiracy theory here)
"Did Trump, or people working for Trump, apply pressure to Ukraine to advance Trumps political interests?"
- We have X, Y and Z who will testify that Trump applied pressure to advance a legitimate investigation into (insert crazy conspiracy theory here)
They can easily argue that all manner of lunacy can come in within the ambit of those questions.
Cartoonist
(7,309 posts)5. It's up to Adam
If he doesn't like the reason, then it's a NO. There is no wiggle room here.
maxsolomon
(33,252 posts)3. Sadly, this indicates a narrow focus to the Impeachment charges.
We're leaving charges on the table, or off the table.
#1. Campaign violation payoffs to Stormy Daniels at Trump's direction.
#2. Charitable Organization Fraud.
#3. 2016 coordination with Rusher and subsequent Obstruction.
IcyPeas
(21,841 posts)4. just on news: Gym Jordan is going to be one of the questioners
this perv loves the tv camera.
BootinUp
(47,085 posts)6. Pretty generous. I would have
allowed less than that.