Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
1. I'm not a lawyer, but wouldn't the usual way to deal with this be to
Sat Nov 9, 2019, 10:54 AM
Nov 2019

hold a pre-trial hearing specifically on this one matter: the relevance of these (republican) witnesses? John Roberts will be the presiding judge. The Dems call witnesses to discredit the conspiracy theories the republicans are pursuing (there are many, including HR McMaster). Most if not all these witnesses would almost certainly be ruled irrelevant and the Impeachment trial could proceed without this distraction.

EDIT: Some of these witnesses are relevant and likely to be called anyway, like Volker and the WB's source witnesses. But Ohr? Hunter Biden? Give me a break.

pecosbob

(7,538 posts)
5. House just laid out the rules for the process...as is their prerogative to do
Sat Nov 9, 2019, 11:13 AM
Nov 2019

Most of the Republican requests for witnesses will be ignored by the commitee as irrelevant, as is their prerogative to do. They will of course badger the witnesses that are actually relevant to the investigation. Then we'll see whether the Chairman is able to control the hearings. Trump et al. has forfeited legal representation at the hearings by refusing to cooperate with the investigation and commanding witnesses not to appear before the Committee, as per the rules for the process laid out by the House...again as is their prerogative to do.

Raftergirl

(1,285 posts)
6. From the looks of most of the people
Sat Nov 9, 2019, 11:21 AM
Nov 2019

they have on this list - don’t think the R’s have a clue what this inquiry is about.

JHB

(37,160 posts)
7. "You Betchum"
Sat Nov 9, 2019, 11:24 AM
Nov 2019

Carnac the Magnificent, divining the answer to the as-yet unseen question
"Are the typos in the last in the actual request document submtted by the Republicans?"

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
8. What?! Where's Obama? Hillary? Holder? Loretta Lynch? Bo the dog?
Sat Nov 9, 2019, 11:50 AM
Nov 2019

This list needs MASSES of other Dems on it!!11!!

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
9. Hunter Biden?
Sat Nov 9, 2019, 11:58 AM
Nov 2019

False conspiracy theory is still false, guys.

I will find it ironic if Trump goes down all because of his refusal to acknowledge the inaccuracy of a conspiracy theory everyone else knew was false.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
10. They'll add - Kermit The Frog, - Hillary Clinton and the Mr's Zilliard's Puppies later cause they...
Sat Nov 9, 2019, 12:10 PM
Nov 2019

... distraction is key here.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republican witness list f...