Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQuestion about Nadler's impeachment hearing, assuming it comes to that.
A friend of a friend is claiming that for that Judiciary committee hearing, the R's will be able to call witnesses of their choosing -- so they will be able to call the WB to testify then. Is that true?
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Question about Nadler's impeachment hearing, assuming it comes to that. (Original Post)
pnwmom
Nov 2019
OP
Fiendish Thingy
(22,454 posts)1. Don't think so- new rules give majority veto power on witnesses nt
2naSalit
(100,952 posts)2. Kind of sort of...
they have put the WB on their list but it's highly unlikely that it would be allowed. The WB is not all that relevant now and it would cause them to be in an altered presence* if they were forced to do so in order to protect them.
* disguising voice and appearing behind a screen, etc.
dewsgirl
(14,964 posts)3. He is on the list, but Adam Schiff stated earlier the
evidence is more than corroborated by far, therefore the WB is irrelevant.
