Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No verdict reached in 1st day of deliberations in Stone trial. (Original Post) triron Nov 2019 OP
I'm really surprised SoCalNative Nov 2019 #1
I'm going to guess that there's a juror in his corner... tenderfoot Nov 2019 #2
yep bluestarone Nov 2019 #3
Could it be the new juror? Docreed2003 Nov 2019 #7
Sounds like Manafort all over again. triron Nov 2019 #4
yea for real bdamomma Nov 2019 #5
I think I heard Glenn Kirschner say that there was concern from jury over one aspect of third count hlthe2b Nov 2019 #6
There are seven charges ddr007 Nov 2019 #8
I think I can see why. It was Stone's attornys who later said in a letter it was Credico. triron Nov 2019 #9
knr triron Nov 2019 #10

SoCalNative

(4,613 posts)
1. I'm really surprised
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 07:50 PM
Nov 2019

that they would have to deliberate more than ten minutes before finding him guilty.

bdamomma

(63,845 posts)
5. yea for real
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 07:57 PM
Nov 2019

how difficult can it be?? Oh well I never did jury duty, so the jurors are confused or something. Geez convict the guy, he's another surrogate of Roy Cohn.

hlthe2b

(102,236 posts)
6. I think I heard Glenn Kirschner say that there was concern from jury over one aspect of third count
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 08:01 PM
Nov 2019

(apparently juries picked up on a prosecutor error in claiming Credico was named by Stone as his intermediary).

It isn't clear the jury is having trouble with all the counts.

ddr007

(25 posts)
8. There are seven charges
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 08:04 PM
Nov 2019

It sounds like they are confused about the language of only one of those charges. That's understandable.

triron

(22,001 posts)
9. I think I can see why. It was Stone's attornys who later said in a letter it was Credico.
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 08:39 PM
Nov 2019

Last edited Thu Nov 14, 2019, 09:18 PM - Edit history (1)

The judge said not to consider the letter as evidence. I can see Jurors' frustration.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No verdict reached in 1st...