Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNo verdict reached in 1st day of deliberations in Stone trial.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/14/roger-stone-jurors-verdict-070989
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No verdict reached in 1st day of deliberations in Stone trial. (Original Post)
triron
Nov 2019
OP
I think I heard Glenn Kirschner say that there was concern from jury over one aspect of third count
hlthe2b
Nov 2019
#6
SoCalNative
(4,613 posts)1. I'm really surprised
that they would have to deliberate more than ten minutes before finding him guilty.
tenderfoot
(8,982 posts)2. I'm going to guess that there's a juror in his corner...
an Alex Jones/Faux/Limbaugh fan.
bluestarone
(21,639 posts)3. yep
Docreed2003
(18,713 posts)7. Could it be the new juror?
The one that replaced the "sick juror".
triron
(22,240 posts)4. Sounds like Manafort all over again.
bdamomma
(69,354 posts)5. yea for real
how difficult can it be?? Oh well I never did jury duty, so the jurors are confused or something. Geez convict the guy, he's another surrogate of Roy Cohn.
hlthe2b
(113,201 posts)6. I think I heard Glenn Kirschner say that there was concern from jury over one aspect of third count
(apparently juries picked up on a prosecutor error in claiming Credico was named by Stone as his intermediary).
It isn't clear the jury is having trouble with all the counts.
ddr007
(25 posts)8. There are seven charges
It sounds like they are confused about the language of only one of those charges. That's understandable.
triron
(22,240 posts)9. I think I can see why. It was Stone's attornys who later said in a letter it was Credico.
Last edited Thu Nov 14, 2019, 08:18 PM - Edit history (1)
The judge said not to consider the letter as evidence. I can see Jurors' frustration.
