Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Botany

(70,447 posts)
Fri Nov 15, 2019, 01:03 PM Nov 2019

ATTN Mueller haters; Stone's indictment was the last brought by special counsel Robert S. Mueller II

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/roger-stone-jury-weighs-evidence-and-a-defense-move-to-make-case-about-mueller/2019/11/15/554fff5a-06ff-11ea-8292-c46ee8cb3dce_story.html


Roger Stone guilty on all counts in federal trial of lying to Congress, witness tampering

By
Rachel Weiner,
Spencer S. Hsu and
Matt Zapotosky

November 15, 2019 at 11:52 a.m. EST

A federal jury has convicted longtime Trump confidant Roger Stone of lying to Congress and tampering with a witness about his efforts to learn about the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks release of hacked Democratic emails in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

The panel of nine women and three men deliberated for less than two days before finding Stone, 67, guilty on all seven counts resulting from his September 2017 testimony to a House intelligence committee investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and the Kremlin’s efforts to damage Trump’s Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton.

snip

Stone’s indictment was the last brought by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, putting on trial his slippery brand of political brawling and revealing important new details about the Trump campaign’s keen interest in computer files hacked by Russia and made public by WikiLeaks. He was accused of lying to Congress and tampering with a witness, an associate prosecutors said Stone threatened in a bid to prevent the man from cooperating with lawmakers.

Though prosecutors sought to prove only that Stone had lied to Congress, they asserted that his motive for the falsehoods was protecting Trump from embarrassment — and thus made the president and his campaign a key component in their case.
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ATTN Mueller haters; Stone's indictment was the last brought by special counsel Robert S. Mueller II (Original Post) Botany Nov 2019 OP
Get thee to the greatest page malaise Nov 2019 #1
We still haven't seen the Mueller report Botany Nov 2019 #2
We are witnessing justice malaise Nov 2019 #4
i'm reading it. barbtries Nov 2019 #10
K & R! 50 Shades Of Blue Nov 2019 #3
Yes indeed, my friend. NRaleighLiberal Nov 2019 #5
Not sure this is the last of the Mueller investigation Bev54 Nov 2019 #6
THANK you!!! StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #7
Thank you so much for this post. Mike 03 Nov 2019 #8
Kicking irisblue Nov 2019 #9
Mueller FTW! nt okaawhatever Nov 2019 #11
Thank you! sheshe2 Nov 2019 #12
That raises a question for me. hvn_nbr_2 Nov 2019 #13
It could have been too far down the pipeline... Botany Nov 2019 #15
we need to get the Mueller documents out from behind Barr's Dirt Services Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #14
Yup Botany Nov 2019 #16
that's it! The only reason to hide them: incriminating. Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #18
I'm not a "Mueller hater," but despite Stone I'm still disapointed in the end result of his Vinca Nov 2019 #17

barbtries

(28,769 posts)
10. i'm reading it.
Fri Nov 15, 2019, 01:26 PM
Nov 2019

very long and difficult read, but even in the redacted version the story is told.
https://www.amazon.com/Mueller-Report-Washington-Post/dp/1982129735/ref=sr_1_3?keywords=the+mueller+report&qid=1573838682&sr=8-3

worthwhile even if redacted. I think a good part of the redactions having to do with Roger Stone are part of the public record now.

Bev54

(10,038 posts)
6. Not sure this is the last of the Mueller investigation
Fri Nov 15, 2019, 01:12 PM
Nov 2019

I suspect there are a few more hidden gems out there.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
8. Thank you so much for this post.
Fri Nov 15, 2019, 01:16 PM
Nov 2019

I get tired of seeing Mueller beat up and the fact is he brought us a long way.

hvn_nbr_2

(6,485 posts)
13. That raises a question for me.
Fri Nov 15, 2019, 03:15 PM
Nov 2019

Barr shut down virtually all the investigations that Mueller spun off to DOJ. Why did he let Stone's case go on?

Botany

(70,447 posts)
15. It could have been too far down the pipeline...
Fri Nov 15, 2019, 05:39 PM
Nov 2019

... for Barr to stop it and or that Trump and company have committed so many crimes that Barr missed this one.

But Stone does tie Trump to Russia/Wikileaks.

Vinca

(50,236 posts)
17. I'm not a "Mueller hater," but despite Stone I'm still disapointed in the end result of his
Fri Nov 15, 2019, 06:46 PM
Nov 2019

investigation. Most particularly, I will never forget that he said it's unconstitutional to indict a sitting president and that's why he didn't pursue anything other than a written Trump interview. It's not even a law about not indicting a president. It's a memo from the 1970's and the author of it said he never anticipated it would be taken as seriously as it has been. That said, I'm happy as a clam about Stone and everyone else who went down for crimes relating to Russia. Sadly, the big fish got out of the net.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ATTN Mueller haters; Ston...