Sat Nov 16, 2019, 06:21 PM
LAS14 (13,629 posts)
If we're all limited to $2500 (real people), how do rich donor parties benefit candidates? nt
|
5 replies, 1640 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
LAS14 | Nov 2019 | OP |
Phoenix61 | Nov 2019 | #1 | |
rainin | Nov 2019 | #2 | |
VarryOn | Nov 2019 | #3 | |
OhNo-Really | Nov 2019 | #4 | |
BuffaloJackalope | Nov 2019 | #5 |
Response to LAS14 (Original post)
Sat Nov 16, 2019, 06:25 PM
Phoenix61 (16,700 posts)
1. It goes to a PAC.
The PAC is supposed to operate independently of the campaign.
|
Response to LAS14 (Original post)
Sat Nov 16, 2019, 06:31 PM
rainin (2,999 posts)
2. superpacs.
Groups organized to support a candidate can take in tens of millions to support the candidate of their choice. No accountability, no transparency.
|
Response to LAS14 (Original post)
Sat Nov 16, 2019, 06:32 PM
VarryOn (2,343 posts)
3. PACs...
The $2500 limit doesnt really matter. If you have the money and want to get blow your money supporting a party, candidate or cause, there are ways.
I maxed out with Obama in 2008 and 2012 and had no shortage of organizations showing me how to give more to help him out. And all legal. |
Response to LAS14 (Original post)
Sat Nov 16, 2019, 06:37 PM
OhNo-Really (3,972 posts)
4. Rudy can help
![]() |
Response to LAS14 (Original post)
Sat Nov 16, 2019, 06:43 PM
BuffaloJackalope (818 posts)
5. Crookedly.
It might be "legal", but it ain't right by any stretch.
|