Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

canetoad

(17,136 posts)
Mon Nov 18, 2019, 06:02 AM Nov 2019

Must Read: "This Is How Trump's Gangster Government Works "

*I'm x-posting this from the Eds. & Arts. forum because it's such a damn good read. Jonathan Last explains succinctly what has gone down with Trump and Ukraine, using the analogy of a drug deal. Plenty of references to the Mueller report too. Fascinating reading!

The president—like a clever drug dealer or gangster—knows the importance of plausible deniability. Now it’s the essence of the GOP defense.

This is how a drug deal works:

Let’s say you want to buy some crack. You drive up to the block where you are going to make your purchase and you pass a member of the team that is running the sale. This member is called the lookout. Let’s call him Mick. He never touches either the drugs or the money and he carries no weapon. Mick’s sole task is to watch for police and send a signal if the cops show up.

You stop your car outside the designated house with your window rolled down and a foot soldier approaches you and accepts your money. Let’s call him Rudy. He then withdraws and takes the money to a secure location, usually the house where the team leader—let’s call this gentleman Donald—is supervising the activity while other one or two other members of the team—just for fun, let’s call them Lev and Igor—package the merchandise.

A third foot soldier then approaches your car and hands you the drugs. Let’s call him Gordon. You drive off. Gordon goes away. Everyone is happy.

This is a carefully choreographed sequence in which Mick the lookout never touches the money, or the drugs, or a weapon. Donald, the team leader, may have a weapon, but never touches either the money or the drugs. The two foot soldiers who handle either side of the exchange—Rudy and Gordon—are siloed so that the guy who handles the money never touches the drugs, and vice versa. Neither of them carries a weapon. And the amount of drugs being held by any individual at any one time is carefully limited to be below various legal thresholds concerning mere possession, possession with intent to distribute, and the higher charges of trafficking, while the disposition of guns is designed to avoid needless exposure to weapons charges.

More: https://thebulwark.com/trumps-clean-hands-defense/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Must Read: "This Is How Trump's Gangster Government Works " (Original Post) canetoad Nov 2019 OP
Good analogy. Arkansas Granny Nov 2019 #1
More from your link UpInArms Nov 2019 #2
That shit's all good, but what about Bengazi? 3Hotdogs Nov 2019 #3
Loved reading it, thank you for posting. n/t aggiesal Nov 2019 #4
org. chart IcyPeas Nov 2019 #5
Very impressive take on the drug-deal analogy. So that's The Bulwark... Hekate Nov 2019 #6
A pleasure, Hekate canetoad Nov 2019 #7

UpInArms

(51,280 posts)
2. More from your link
Mon Nov 18, 2019, 06:34 AM
Nov 2019
Imagine that you are sitting on a jury listening to a drug-trafficking case being made against this crew. Prosecutors produce witnesses who saw Mick standing on the corner with a phone that had Donald’s number in it. They saw Rudy walking into the house with the money from the car. They saw Gordon leaving the house and approaching the car with the drugs. They saw Donald in the house, watching the whole thing.

And now imagine that the defense team’s argument is that, since no one saw Donald holding the money and the drugs at the same time, he can’t be guilty of dealing drugs.

Hekate

(90,556 posts)
6. Very impressive take on the drug-deal analogy. So that's The Bulwark...
Mon Nov 18, 2019, 03:42 PM
Nov 2019

I think I'll explore it some more.

Thanks, canetoad.

canetoad

(17,136 posts)
7. A pleasure, Hekate
Mon Nov 18, 2019, 03:48 PM
Nov 2019

The Bulwark is principally a conservative publication, but they are old school and have some good articles.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Must Read: "This Is How T...