General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe way that black holes are detected is analogous to an indirect proof of Trump's guilt
You don't detect a black hole directly, but rather by the absence of what's around it.
Similarly, everyone around Trump *knew* about the de facto quid pro quo, but the absence of Trump actually ever saying it explicitly proves so clearly Trump's consciousness of guilt.
I'm not wording this well, but I hope the concept is clear. Help me word it better, please?
ETA: Maybe it's this, that considering *everyone* knew about the conditions, it's suspiciously conspicuously absent from Trump's mouth.
nolabear
(41,956 posts)The_Counsel
(1,660 posts)...despite the President never actually ever saying it?? He made it clear at some point. And if this wasn't his idea, he STILL AGREED WITH IT by July 25 or that phone call would not have gone the way it did ("I need a favor, though" ), right?
intrepidity
(7,288 posts)They want it both ways.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)Caliman73
(11,726 posts)"What about Andy?"
Boss 1: "He won't talk. He's solid"
Boss 2: "He's a fucken Marine, like his father. He's okay"
Boss 3: "He's always been a good kid, at least that's the way I see it."
Boss 1: "Remo, how do you see it"
Remo: (Shrugs) "Why take a chance?"
No one said it, but Andy got capped.